Cargando…
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan‐1,4‐α‐glucosidase from the non‐genetically modified Rhizopus delemar strain CU634‐1775
The food enzyme glucan‐1,4‐α‐glucosidase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucohydrolase; EC 3.1.2.3) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Rhizopus delemar strain CU634‐1775 by Shin Nihon Chemical Co., Ltd. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production strain. It is intended to be used in six fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846389 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7841 |
_version_ | 1784892597716647936 |
---|---|
author | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi di Piazza, Giulio de Ferreira de Sousa, Rita Chesson, Andrew |
author_facet | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi di Piazza, Giulio de Ferreira de Sousa, Rita Chesson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The food enzyme glucan‐1,4‐α‐glucosidase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucohydrolase; EC 3.1.2.3) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Rhizopus delemar strain CU634‐1775 by Shin Nihon Chemical Co., Ltd. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production strain. It is intended to be used in six food manufacturing processes: baking processes, starch processing for production of glucose syrups and other starch hydrolysates, fruit and vegetable processing for juice production, fruit and vegetable processing for products other than juices, brewing processes and distilled alcohol production. As residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed by distillation and by the purification steps applied during the production of glucose syrups, dietary exposure was not calculated for these two food processes. For the remaining four food processes, dietary exposure to the food enzyme‐total organic solids was estimated to be up to 1.238 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. Systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,735 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which, when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 1,401. In a search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens, a single match with a respiratory allergen was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9947622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99476222023-02-24 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan‐1,4‐α‐glucosidase from the non‐genetically modified Rhizopus delemar strain CU634‐1775 Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi di Piazza, Giulio de Ferreira de Sousa, Rita Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme glucan‐1,4‐α‐glucosidase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucohydrolase; EC 3.1.2.3) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Rhizopus delemar strain CU634‐1775 by Shin Nihon Chemical Co., Ltd. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production strain. It is intended to be used in six food manufacturing processes: baking processes, starch processing for production of glucose syrups and other starch hydrolysates, fruit and vegetable processing for juice production, fruit and vegetable processing for products other than juices, brewing processes and distilled alcohol production. As residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed by distillation and by the purification steps applied during the production of glucose syrups, dietary exposure was not calculated for these two food processes. For the remaining four food processes, dietary exposure to the food enzyme‐total organic solids was estimated to be up to 1.238 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. Systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,735 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which, when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 1,401. In a search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens, a single match with a respiratory allergen was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9947622/ /pubmed/36846389 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7841 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Aguilera, Jaime Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi di Piazza, Giulio de Ferreira de Sousa, Rita Chesson, Andrew Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan‐1,4‐α‐glucosidase from the non‐genetically modified Rhizopus delemar strain CU634‐1775 |
title | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan‐1,4‐α‐glucosidase from the non‐genetically modified Rhizopus delemar strain CU634‐1775 |
title_full | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan‐1,4‐α‐glucosidase from the non‐genetically modified Rhizopus delemar strain CU634‐1775 |
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan‐1,4‐α‐glucosidase from the non‐genetically modified Rhizopus delemar strain CU634‐1775 |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan‐1,4‐α‐glucosidase from the non‐genetically modified Rhizopus delemar strain CU634‐1775 |
title_short | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan‐1,4‐α‐glucosidase from the non‐genetically modified Rhizopus delemar strain CU634‐1775 |
title_sort | safety evaluation of the food enzyme glucan‐1,4‐α‐glucosidase from the non‐genetically modified rhizopus delemar strain cu634‐1775 |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846389 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7841 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT lambreclaude safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT mengelersmarcel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT glandorfboet safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT aguilerajaime safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT kovalkovicovanatalia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT dipiazzagiulio safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT deferreiradesousarita safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeglucan14aglucosidasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedrhizopusdelemarstraincu6341775 |