Cargando…

Process control: simply a matter of efficiency or of survival and costs? A single-centre quality improvement project in living donor renal transplant

BACKGROUND: Rising incidence and prevalence of end-stage renal disease is a worldwide concern for sustainability of healthcare systems and societies. Living donor renal transplant [LDRT] provides highest health achievements and cost containment than any alternative form of renal replacement therapy....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paoletti, Filippo, Giorgio, Vittori, Jaser, Adel, Zanoni, Natalia Romina, Ricciardi, Walter, Citterio, Franco, De Belvis, Antonio Giulio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36823623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09183-3
_version_ 1784892662410641408
author Paoletti, Filippo
Giorgio, Vittori
Jaser, Adel
Zanoni, Natalia Romina
Ricciardi, Walter
Citterio, Franco
De Belvis, Antonio Giulio
author_facet Paoletti, Filippo
Giorgio, Vittori
Jaser, Adel
Zanoni, Natalia Romina
Ricciardi, Walter
Citterio, Franco
De Belvis, Antonio Giulio
author_sort Paoletti, Filippo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rising incidence and prevalence of end-stage renal disease is a worldwide concern for sustainability of healthcare systems and societies. Living donor renal transplant [LDRT] provides highest health achievements and cost containment than any alternative form of renal replacement therapy. Nonetheless, about 25% of potential LDRTs are missed for causes directly related with inadequate timing in donor assessment. Our quality improvement (QI) project implement process control tools and strategy aiming at reducing total evaluation time for donor candidates and minimizing dialysis exposure for intended recipients, which are the two main determinants of clinical outcomes and costs. METHODS: The study includes patients who underwent donor nephrectomy between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021. Six Sigma DMAIC approach was adopted to assess Base Case performance (Jan2017-Jun2019) and to design and implement our QI project. Study of current state analysis focused on distribution of time intervals within the assessment process, analysis of roles and impacts of involved healthcare providers and identification of targets of improvement. Improved Scenario (Jul2019-Dec2021) was assessed in terms of total lead time reduction, total pre-transplantation dialysis exposure and costs reduction, and increase in pre-emptive transplantations. The study was reported following SQUIRE 2.0 Guidelines for QI projects. RESULTS: Study population includes 63 patients, 37 in Base Case and 26 in Improved Scenario. Total lead time reduced from a median of 293 to 166 days and this in turn reduced pre-transplantation dialysis exposure and costs by 45%. Rate of potential pre-emptive donors’ loss changes from 44% to 27%. CONCLUSIONS: Lean methodology is an effective tool to improve quality and efficiency of healthcare processes, in the interest of patients, healthcare professionals and payers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9947903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99479032023-02-23 Process control: simply a matter of efficiency or of survival and costs? A single-centre quality improvement project in living donor renal transplant Paoletti, Filippo Giorgio, Vittori Jaser, Adel Zanoni, Natalia Romina Ricciardi, Walter Citterio, Franco De Belvis, Antonio Giulio BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Rising incidence and prevalence of end-stage renal disease is a worldwide concern for sustainability of healthcare systems and societies. Living donor renal transplant [LDRT] provides highest health achievements and cost containment than any alternative form of renal replacement therapy. Nonetheless, about 25% of potential LDRTs are missed for causes directly related with inadequate timing in donor assessment. Our quality improvement (QI) project implement process control tools and strategy aiming at reducing total evaluation time for donor candidates and minimizing dialysis exposure for intended recipients, which are the two main determinants of clinical outcomes and costs. METHODS: The study includes patients who underwent donor nephrectomy between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021. Six Sigma DMAIC approach was adopted to assess Base Case performance (Jan2017-Jun2019) and to design and implement our QI project. Study of current state analysis focused on distribution of time intervals within the assessment process, analysis of roles and impacts of involved healthcare providers and identification of targets of improvement. Improved Scenario (Jul2019-Dec2021) was assessed in terms of total lead time reduction, total pre-transplantation dialysis exposure and costs reduction, and increase in pre-emptive transplantations. The study was reported following SQUIRE 2.0 Guidelines for QI projects. RESULTS: Study population includes 63 patients, 37 in Base Case and 26 in Improved Scenario. Total lead time reduced from a median of 293 to 166 days and this in turn reduced pre-transplantation dialysis exposure and costs by 45%. Rate of potential pre-emptive donors’ loss changes from 44% to 27%. CONCLUSIONS: Lean methodology is an effective tool to improve quality and efficiency of healthcare processes, in the interest of patients, healthcare professionals and payers. BioMed Central 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9947903/ /pubmed/36823623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09183-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Paoletti, Filippo
Giorgio, Vittori
Jaser, Adel
Zanoni, Natalia Romina
Ricciardi, Walter
Citterio, Franco
De Belvis, Antonio Giulio
Process control: simply a matter of efficiency or of survival and costs? A single-centre quality improvement project in living donor renal transplant
title Process control: simply a matter of efficiency or of survival and costs? A single-centre quality improvement project in living donor renal transplant
title_full Process control: simply a matter of efficiency or of survival and costs? A single-centre quality improvement project in living donor renal transplant
title_fullStr Process control: simply a matter of efficiency or of survival and costs? A single-centre quality improvement project in living donor renal transplant
title_full_unstemmed Process control: simply a matter of efficiency or of survival and costs? A single-centre quality improvement project in living donor renal transplant
title_short Process control: simply a matter of efficiency or of survival and costs? A single-centre quality improvement project in living donor renal transplant
title_sort process control: simply a matter of efficiency or of survival and costs? a single-centre quality improvement project in living donor renal transplant
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36823623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09183-3
work_keys_str_mv AT paolettifilippo processcontrolsimplyamatterofefficiencyorofsurvivalandcostsasinglecentrequalityimprovementprojectinlivingdonorrenaltransplant
AT giorgiovittori processcontrolsimplyamatterofefficiencyorofsurvivalandcostsasinglecentrequalityimprovementprojectinlivingdonorrenaltransplant
AT jaseradel processcontrolsimplyamatterofefficiencyorofsurvivalandcostsasinglecentrequalityimprovementprojectinlivingdonorrenaltransplant
AT zanoninataliaromina processcontrolsimplyamatterofefficiencyorofsurvivalandcostsasinglecentrequalityimprovementprojectinlivingdonorrenaltransplant
AT ricciardiwalter processcontrolsimplyamatterofefficiencyorofsurvivalandcostsasinglecentrequalityimprovementprojectinlivingdonorrenaltransplant
AT citteriofranco processcontrolsimplyamatterofefficiencyorofsurvivalandcostsasinglecentrequalityimprovementprojectinlivingdonorrenaltransplant
AT debelvisantoniogiulio processcontrolsimplyamatterofefficiencyorofsurvivalandcostsasinglecentrequalityimprovementprojectinlivingdonorrenaltransplant