Cargando…
Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial
Objective To evaluate the effect of the carbohydrate counting method (CCM) on glycemic control, maternal, and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods Nonrandomized controlled clinical trial performed with 89 pregnant women who had pregestational DM...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35139572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742291 |
_version_ | 1784892705338294272 |
---|---|
author | Oliveira, Larissa Mello de Belfort, Gabriella Pinto Padilha, Patricia de Carvalho Rosado, Eliane Lopes Silva, Letícia Barbosa Gabriel da Fagherazzi, Sanmira Zajdenverg, Lenita Zagury, Roberto Luís Saunders, Claudia |
author_facet | Oliveira, Larissa Mello de Belfort, Gabriella Pinto Padilha, Patricia de Carvalho Rosado, Eliane Lopes Silva, Letícia Barbosa Gabriel da Fagherazzi, Sanmira Zajdenverg, Lenita Zagury, Roberto Luís Saunders, Claudia |
author_sort | Oliveira, Larissa Mello de |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To evaluate the effect of the carbohydrate counting method (CCM) on glycemic control, maternal, and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods Nonrandomized controlled clinical trial performed with 89 pregnant women who had pregestational DM and received prenatal care in a public hospital in Rio de Janeiro, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between 2009 and 2014, subdivided into historic control group and intervention group, not simultaneous. The intervention group ( n = 51) received nutritional guidance from the carbohydrate counting method (CCM), and the historical control group ( n = 38), was guided by the traditional method (TM). The Mann-Whitney test or the Wilcoxon test were used to compare intra- and intergroup outcomes and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures, corrected by the Bonferroni post-hoc test, was used to assess postprandial blood glucose. Results Only the CCM group showed a reduction in fasting blood glucose. Postprandial blood glucose decreased in the 2 (nd) ( p = 0.00) and 3 (rd) ( p = 0.00) gestational trimester in the CCM group, while in the TM group the reduction occurred only in the 2 (nd) trimester ( p = 0.015). For perinatal outcomes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, there were no differences between groups. Cesarean delivery was performed in 82% of the pregnant women and was associated with hypertensive disorders (gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia; p = 0.047). Conclusion Both methods of nutritional guidance contributed to the reduction of postprandial glycemia of women and no differences were observed for maternal and perinatal outcomes. However, CCM had a better effect on postprandial glycemia and only this method contributed to reducing fasting blood glucose throughout the intervention. ReBEC Clinical Trials Database The present study was registered in the ReBEC Clinical Trials Database (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, number RBR-524z9n). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9948103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99481032023-07-27 Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial Oliveira, Larissa Mello de Belfort, Gabriella Pinto Padilha, Patricia de Carvalho Rosado, Eliane Lopes Silva, Letícia Barbosa Gabriel da Fagherazzi, Sanmira Zajdenverg, Lenita Zagury, Roberto Luís Saunders, Claudia Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Objective To evaluate the effect of the carbohydrate counting method (CCM) on glycemic control, maternal, and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods Nonrandomized controlled clinical trial performed with 89 pregnant women who had pregestational DM and received prenatal care in a public hospital in Rio de Janeiro, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between 2009 and 2014, subdivided into historic control group and intervention group, not simultaneous. The intervention group ( n = 51) received nutritional guidance from the carbohydrate counting method (CCM), and the historical control group ( n = 38), was guided by the traditional method (TM). The Mann-Whitney test or the Wilcoxon test were used to compare intra- and intergroup outcomes and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures, corrected by the Bonferroni post-hoc test, was used to assess postprandial blood glucose. Results Only the CCM group showed a reduction in fasting blood glucose. Postprandial blood glucose decreased in the 2 (nd) ( p = 0.00) and 3 (rd) ( p = 0.00) gestational trimester in the CCM group, while in the TM group the reduction occurred only in the 2 (nd) trimester ( p = 0.015). For perinatal outcomes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, there were no differences between groups. Cesarean delivery was performed in 82% of the pregnant women and was associated with hypertensive disorders (gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia; p = 0.047). Conclusion Both methods of nutritional guidance contributed to the reduction of postprandial glycemia of women and no differences were observed for maternal and perinatal outcomes. However, CCM had a better effect on postprandial glycemia and only this method contributed to reducing fasting blood glucose throughout the intervention. ReBEC Clinical Trials Database The present study was registered in the ReBEC Clinical Trials Database (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, number RBR-524z9n). Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9948103/ /pubmed/35139572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742291 Text en Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Oliveira, Larissa Mello de Belfort, Gabriella Pinto Padilha, Patricia de Carvalho Rosado, Eliane Lopes Silva, Letícia Barbosa Gabriel da Fagherazzi, Sanmira Zajdenverg, Lenita Zagury, Roberto Luís Saunders, Claudia Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial |
title | Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_full | Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_short | Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_sort | impact of carbohydrate counting method during pregnancy in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus: a controlled clinical trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35139572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742291 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oliveiralarissamellode impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial AT belfortgabriellapinto impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial AT padilhapatriciadecarvalho impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial AT rosadoelianelopes impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial AT silvaleticiabarbosagabrielda impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial AT fagherazzisanmira impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial AT zajdenverglenita impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial AT zaguryrobertoluis impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial AT saundersclaudia impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial |