Cargando…

Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial

Objective  To evaluate the effect of the carbohydrate counting method (CCM) on glycemic control, maternal, and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods  Nonrandomized controlled clinical trial performed with 89 pregnant women who had pregestational DM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, Larissa Mello de, Belfort, Gabriella Pinto, Padilha, Patricia de Carvalho, Rosado, Eliane Lopes, Silva, Letícia Barbosa Gabriel da, Fagherazzi, Sanmira, Zajdenverg, Lenita, Zagury, Roberto Luís, Saunders, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35139572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742291
_version_ 1784892705338294272
author Oliveira, Larissa Mello de
Belfort, Gabriella Pinto
Padilha, Patricia de Carvalho
Rosado, Eliane Lopes
Silva, Letícia Barbosa Gabriel da
Fagherazzi, Sanmira
Zajdenverg, Lenita
Zagury, Roberto Luís
Saunders, Claudia
author_facet Oliveira, Larissa Mello de
Belfort, Gabriella Pinto
Padilha, Patricia de Carvalho
Rosado, Eliane Lopes
Silva, Letícia Barbosa Gabriel da
Fagherazzi, Sanmira
Zajdenverg, Lenita
Zagury, Roberto Luís
Saunders, Claudia
author_sort Oliveira, Larissa Mello de
collection PubMed
description Objective  To evaluate the effect of the carbohydrate counting method (CCM) on glycemic control, maternal, and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods  Nonrandomized controlled clinical trial performed with 89 pregnant women who had pregestational DM and received prenatal care in a public hospital in Rio de Janeiro, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between 2009 and 2014, subdivided into historic control group and intervention group, not simultaneous. The intervention group ( n  = 51) received nutritional guidance from the carbohydrate counting method (CCM), and the historical control group ( n  = 38), was guided by the traditional method (TM). The Mann-Whitney test or the Wilcoxon test were used to compare intra- and intergroup outcomes and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures, corrected by the Bonferroni post-hoc test, was used to assess postprandial blood glucose. Results  Only the CCM group showed a reduction in fasting blood glucose. Postprandial blood glucose decreased in the 2 (nd) ( p  = 0.00) and 3 (rd) ( p  = 0.00) gestational trimester in the CCM group, while in the TM group the reduction occurred only in the 2 (nd) trimester ( p  = 0.015). For perinatal outcomes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, there were no differences between groups. Cesarean delivery was performed in 82% of the pregnant women and was associated with hypertensive disorders (gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia; p  = 0.047). Conclusion  Both methods of nutritional guidance contributed to the reduction of postprandial glycemia of women and no differences were observed for maternal and perinatal outcomes. However, CCM had a better effect on postprandial glycemia and only this method contributed to reducing fasting blood glucose throughout the intervention. ReBEC Clinical Trials Database  The present study was registered in the ReBEC Clinical Trials Database (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, number RBR-524z9n).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9948103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99481032023-07-27 Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial Oliveira, Larissa Mello de Belfort, Gabriella Pinto Padilha, Patricia de Carvalho Rosado, Eliane Lopes Silva, Letícia Barbosa Gabriel da Fagherazzi, Sanmira Zajdenverg, Lenita Zagury, Roberto Luís Saunders, Claudia Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Objective  To evaluate the effect of the carbohydrate counting method (CCM) on glycemic control, maternal, and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods  Nonrandomized controlled clinical trial performed with 89 pregnant women who had pregestational DM and received prenatal care in a public hospital in Rio de Janeiro, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between 2009 and 2014, subdivided into historic control group and intervention group, not simultaneous. The intervention group ( n  = 51) received nutritional guidance from the carbohydrate counting method (CCM), and the historical control group ( n  = 38), was guided by the traditional method (TM). The Mann-Whitney test or the Wilcoxon test were used to compare intra- and intergroup outcomes and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures, corrected by the Bonferroni post-hoc test, was used to assess postprandial blood glucose. Results  Only the CCM group showed a reduction in fasting blood glucose. Postprandial blood glucose decreased in the 2 (nd) ( p  = 0.00) and 3 (rd) ( p  = 0.00) gestational trimester in the CCM group, while in the TM group the reduction occurred only in the 2 (nd) trimester ( p  = 0.015). For perinatal outcomes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, there were no differences between groups. Cesarean delivery was performed in 82% of the pregnant women and was associated with hypertensive disorders (gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia; p  = 0.047). Conclusion  Both methods of nutritional guidance contributed to the reduction of postprandial glycemia of women and no differences were observed for maternal and perinatal outcomes. However, CCM had a better effect on postprandial glycemia and only this method contributed to reducing fasting blood glucose throughout the intervention. ReBEC Clinical Trials Database  The present study was registered in the ReBEC Clinical Trials Database (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, number RBR-524z9n). Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9948103/ /pubmed/35139572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742291 Text en Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oliveira, Larissa Mello de
Belfort, Gabriella Pinto
Padilha, Patricia de Carvalho
Rosado, Eliane Lopes
Silva, Letícia Barbosa Gabriel da
Fagherazzi, Sanmira
Zajdenverg, Lenita
Zagury, Roberto Luís
Saunders, Claudia
Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial
title Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial
title_full Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial
title_short Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial
title_sort impact of carbohydrate counting method during pregnancy in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus: a controlled clinical trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35139572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742291
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveiralarissamellode impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial
AT belfortgabriellapinto impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial
AT padilhapatriciadecarvalho impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial
AT rosadoelianelopes impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial
AT silvaleticiabarbosagabrielda impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial
AT fagherazzisanmira impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial
AT zajdenverglenita impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial
AT zaguryrobertoluis impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial
AT saundersclaudia impactofcarbohydratecountingmethodduringpregnancyinwomenwithpregestationaldiabetesmellitusacontrolledclinicaltrial