Cargando…

Left–Right‐Position, party affiliation and regional differences explain low COVID‐19 vaccination rates in Germany

Established vaccine hesitancy measurement instruments, such as the Vaccine Hesitancy Determinants Matrix, are not sufficiently equipped to adequately and consistently measure political and ideological attitudes. Focusing on Germany, which is a particularly interesting case since it witnessed the est...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jäckle, Sebastian, Timmis, James K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36622064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14210
_version_ 1784892733110878208
author Jäckle, Sebastian
Timmis, James K.
author_facet Jäckle, Sebastian
Timmis, James K.
author_sort Jäckle, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Established vaccine hesitancy measurement instruments, such as the Vaccine Hesitancy Determinants Matrix, are not sufficiently equipped to adequately and consistently measure political and ideological attitudes. Focusing on Germany, which is a particularly interesting case since it witnessed the establishment of the by far most well‐organized and sustained ‘anti‐Covid’ movement in Europe, this quantitative study explores the impact of political ideology and partisanship on the degree of vaccine hesitancy based on four surveys (February—October 2021) among more than 30,000 individuals. We demonstrate that party affiliation, political ideology and region of residence all impact vaccine hesitancy. In fact, they turn out to have a greater impact than two factors often analysed with respect to vaccine hesitancy: gender and educational background. Further interaction models show that the effect of political ideology on vaccine hesitancy is moderated by age, gender and region of residency. For instance, while the more rightwing a young individual is, the more hesitant they are towards SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination—for older individuals, this is not the case. Our findings are relevant for future investigators measuring vaccine hesitancy and policy makers contemplating the differential impact of complex public health interventions: as the impact of political and ideological attitudes on vaccine hesitancy are not adequately captured by established vaccine hesitancy measurement instruments, we recommend its modification to include a clear and harmonised definition of the political‐ideological dimension of vaccine hesitancy together with pre‐validated measurement items that improve future studies. In addition, we reason that vaccine hesitancy, while being an outcome of complex socio‐political factors, is in itself an indicator for societal cohesion and anomie, the degree of which is associated with trust in (health) policy makers, (public) health authorities, health service providers, etc. Therefore, we further recommend that vaccine hesitancy questions should be integrated in pertinent national surveys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9948222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99482222023-02-24 Left–Right‐Position, party affiliation and regional differences explain low COVID‐19 vaccination rates in Germany Jäckle, Sebastian Timmis, James K. Microb Biotechnol Regular Issue Established vaccine hesitancy measurement instruments, such as the Vaccine Hesitancy Determinants Matrix, are not sufficiently equipped to adequately and consistently measure political and ideological attitudes. Focusing on Germany, which is a particularly interesting case since it witnessed the establishment of the by far most well‐organized and sustained ‘anti‐Covid’ movement in Europe, this quantitative study explores the impact of political ideology and partisanship on the degree of vaccine hesitancy based on four surveys (February—October 2021) among more than 30,000 individuals. We demonstrate that party affiliation, political ideology and region of residence all impact vaccine hesitancy. In fact, they turn out to have a greater impact than two factors often analysed with respect to vaccine hesitancy: gender and educational background. Further interaction models show that the effect of political ideology on vaccine hesitancy is moderated by age, gender and region of residency. For instance, while the more rightwing a young individual is, the more hesitant they are towards SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination—for older individuals, this is not the case. Our findings are relevant for future investigators measuring vaccine hesitancy and policy makers contemplating the differential impact of complex public health interventions: as the impact of political and ideological attitudes on vaccine hesitancy are not adequately captured by established vaccine hesitancy measurement instruments, we recommend its modification to include a clear and harmonised definition of the political‐ideological dimension of vaccine hesitancy together with pre‐validated measurement items that improve future studies. In addition, we reason that vaccine hesitancy, while being an outcome of complex socio‐political factors, is in itself an indicator for societal cohesion and anomie, the degree of which is associated with trust in (health) policy makers, (public) health authorities, health service providers, etc. Therefore, we further recommend that vaccine hesitancy questions should be integrated in pertinent national surveys. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9948222/ /pubmed/36622064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14210 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by Applied Microbiology International and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Regular Issue
Jäckle, Sebastian
Timmis, James K.
Left–Right‐Position, party affiliation and regional differences explain low COVID‐19 vaccination rates in Germany
title Left–Right‐Position, party affiliation and regional differences explain low COVID‐19 vaccination rates in Germany
title_full Left–Right‐Position, party affiliation and regional differences explain low COVID‐19 vaccination rates in Germany
title_fullStr Left–Right‐Position, party affiliation and regional differences explain low COVID‐19 vaccination rates in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Left–Right‐Position, party affiliation and regional differences explain low COVID‐19 vaccination rates in Germany
title_short Left–Right‐Position, party affiliation and regional differences explain low COVID‐19 vaccination rates in Germany
title_sort left–right‐position, party affiliation and regional differences explain low covid‐19 vaccination rates in germany
topic Regular Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36622064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14210
work_keys_str_mv AT jacklesebastian leftrightpositionpartyaffiliationandregionaldifferencesexplainlowcovid19vaccinationratesingermany
AT timmisjamesk leftrightpositionpartyaffiliationandregionaldifferencesexplainlowcovid19vaccinationratesingermany