Cargando…

Burch Procedure: A Historical Perspective

Introduction  The Burch procedure (1961) was considered the gold standard treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) before the midurethral slings (MUSs) were introduced, in 2001. Objective  This historical perspective of the Burch's timeline can encourage urogynecological surgeons to mast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marquini, Gisele Vissoci, Bella, Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin de Jarmy di, Sartori, Marair Gracio Ferreira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744312
_version_ 1784892743285211136
author Marquini, Gisele Vissoci
Bella, Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin de Jarmy di
Sartori, Marair Gracio Ferreira
author_facet Marquini, Gisele Vissoci
Bella, Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin de Jarmy di
Sartori, Marair Gracio Ferreira
author_sort Marquini, Gisele Vissoci
collection PubMed
description Introduction  The Burch procedure (1961) was considered the gold standard treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) before the midurethral slings (MUSs) were introduced, in 2001. Objective  This historical perspective of the Burch's timeline can encourage urogynecological surgeons to master the Burch technique as one of the options for surgical treatment of SUI. Search Strategy and Selection Criteria  A bibliographic search was performed in the PubMed and National Library of Medicine (NIH) databases with the terms Burch colposuspension AND history AND stress urinary incontinence in the last 20 years. The original article by Burch (1961) was included. The references were read by three authors. The exclusion criterion was studies in non-English languages. Biomedical Library Special Collections were included as historical relevant search. Data Collection, Analysis and Main Results  Some modifications of the technique have been made since the Burch procedure was first described. The interest in this technique has been increasing due to the negative publicity associated with vaginal synthetic mesh products. Twenty-nine relevant articles were included in the present review article, and numerous trials have compared Burch colposuspension with MUS. Conclusion  This historical perspective enables the scientific community to review a standardized technique for SUI. Burch colposuspension should be considered an appropriate surgical treatment for women with SUI, and an option in urogynecological training programs worldwide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9948263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99482632023-07-27 Burch Procedure: A Historical Perspective Marquini, Gisele Vissoci Bella, Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin de Jarmy di Sartori, Marair Gracio Ferreira Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Introduction  The Burch procedure (1961) was considered the gold standard treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) before the midurethral slings (MUSs) were introduced, in 2001. Objective  This historical perspective of the Burch's timeline can encourage urogynecological surgeons to master the Burch technique as one of the options for surgical treatment of SUI. Search Strategy and Selection Criteria  A bibliographic search was performed in the PubMed and National Library of Medicine (NIH) databases with the terms Burch colposuspension AND history AND stress urinary incontinence in the last 20 years. The original article by Burch (1961) was included. The references were read by three authors. The exclusion criterion was studies in non-English languages. Biomedical Library Special Collections were included as historical relevant search. Data Collection, Analysis and Main Results  Some modifications of the technique have been made since the Burch procedure was first described. The interest in this technique has been increasing due to the negative publicity associated with vaginal synthetic mesh products. Twenty-nine relevant articles were included in the present review article, and numerous trials have compared Burch colposuspension with MUS. Conclusion  This historical perspective enables the scientific community to review a standardized technique for SUI. Burch colposuspension should be considered an appropriate surgical treatment for women with SUI, and an option in urogynecological training programs worldwide. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9948263/ /pubmed/35181882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744312 Text en Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Marquini, Gisele Vissoci
Bella, Zsuzsanna Ilona Katalin de Jarmy di
Sartori, Marair Gracio Ferreira
Burch Procedure: A Historical Perspective
title Burch Procedure: A Historical Perspective
title_full Burch Procedure: A Historical Perspective
title_fullStr Burch Procedure: A Historical Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Burch Procedure: A Historical Perspective
title_short Burch Procedure: A Historical Perspective
title_sort burch procedure: a historical perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744312
work_keys_str_mv AT marquinigiselevissoci burchprocedureahistoricalperspective
AT bellazsuzsannailonakatalindejarmydi burchprocedureahistoricalperspective
AT sartorimarairgracioferreira burchprocedureahistoricalperspective