Cargando…

High-dose proton beam therapy versus conventional fractionated radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND: High-dose proton beam therapy (PBT) uses excellent dose concentricity based on the unique characteristic termed the Bragg peak. PBT is a highly feasible treatment option that improves survival in select patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). However, selection bias remains an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuda, Masahide, Mizumoto, Masashi, Kohzuki, Hidehiro, Sugii, Narushi, Sakurai, Hideyuki, Ishikawa, Eiichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36823671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02236-1
_version_ 1784892753158602752
author Matsuda, Masahide
Mizumoto, Masashi
Kohzuki, Hidehiro
Sugii, Narushi
Sakurai, Hideyuki
Ishikawa, Eiichi
author_facet Matsuda, Masahide
Mizumoto, Masashi
Kohzuki, Hidehiro
Sugii, Narushi
Sakurai, Hideyuki
Ishikawa, Eiichi
author_sort Matsuda, Masahide
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High-dose proton beam therapy (PBT) uses excellent dose concentricity based on the unique characteristic termed the Bragg peak. PBT is a highly feasible treatment option that improves survival in select patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). However, selection bias remains an issue in prior studies that evaluated the efficacy of PBT. The aim of the present study was to compare the survival outcomes and toxicities of high-dose PBT and conventional radiation therapy (CRT) using propensity score-matched treatment cohorts. METHODS: The analysis included patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated with high-dose PBT of 96.6 Gy (RBE) or CRT of 60 Gy from 2010 to 2020. Propensity score generation and 1:1 matching of patients were performed based on the following covariates: age, sex, tumor location, extent of resection, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and pre-radiation Karnofsky performance scale score. RESULTS: From a total of 235 patients, 26 were selected in each group by propensity score matching. The median overall survival (OS) of the PBT group was 28.3 months, while the median OS of the CRT group was 21.2 months. Although acute radiation-related toxicities were equivalent between the PBT and CRT groups, radiation necrosis as a late radiation-related toxicity was observed significantly more frequently in the PBT group. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose PBT provided significant survival benefits for patients with newly diagnosed GBM compared to CRT as shown by propensity score matching analysis. Radiation necrosis remains an issue in high-dose PBT; thus, the establishment of an effective treatment strategy centered on bevacizumab would be essential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9948305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99483052023-02-24 High-dose proton beam therapy versus conventional fractionated radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a propensity score matching analysis Matsuda, Masahide Mizumoto, Masashi Kohzuki, Hidehiro Sugii, Narushi Sakurai, Hideyuki Ishikawa, Eiichi Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: High-dose proton beam therapy (PBT) uses excellent dose concentricity based on the unique characteristic termed the Bragg peak. PBT is a highly feasible treatment option that improves survival in select patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). However, selection bias remains an issue in prior studies that evaluated the efficacy of PBT. The aim of the present study was to compare the survival outcomes and toxicities of high-dose PBT and conventional radiation therapy (CRT) using propensity score-matched treatment cohorts. METHODS: The analysis included patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated with high-dose PBT of 96.6 Gy (RBE) or CRT of 60 Gy from 2010 to 2020. Propensity score generation and 1:1 matching of patients were performed based on the following covariates: age, sex, tumor location, extent of resection, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and pre-radiation Karnofsky performance scale score. RESULTS: From a total of 235 patients, 26 were selected in each group by propensity score matching. The median overall survival (OS) of the PBT group was 28.3 months, while the median OS of the CRT group was 21.2 months. Although acute radiation-related toxicities were equivalent between the PBT and CRT groups, radiation necrosis as a late radiation-related toxicity was observed significantly more frequently in the PBT group. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose PBT provided significant survival benefits for patients with newly diagnosed GBM compared to CRT as shown by propensity score matching analysis. Radiation necrosis remains an issue in high-dose PBT; thus, the establishment of an effective treatment strategy centered on bevacizumab would be essential. BioMed Central 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9948305/ /pubmed/36823671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02236-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Matsuda, Masahide
Mizumoto, Masashi
Kohzuki, Hidehiro
Sugii, Narushi
Sakurai, Hideyuki
Ishikawa, Eiichi
High-dose proton beam therapy versus conventional fractionated radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a propensity score matching analysis
title High-dose proton beam therapy versus conventional fractionated radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a propensity score matching analysis
title_full High-dose proton beam therapy versus conventional fractionated radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a propensity score matching analysis
title_fullStr High-dose proton beam therapy versus conventional fractionated radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a propensity score matching analysis
title_full_unstemmed High-dose proton beam therapy versus conventional fractionated radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a propensity score matching analysis
title_short High-dose proton beam therapy versus conventional fractionated radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a propensity score matching analysis
title_sort high-dose proton beam therapy versus conventional fractionated radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a propensity score matching analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36823671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02236-1
work_keys_str_mv AT matsudamasahide highdoseprotonbeamtherapyversusconventionalfractionatedradiationtherapyfornewlydiagnosedglioblastomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT mizumotomasashi highdoseprotonbeamtherapyversusconventionalfractionatedradiationtherapyfornewlydiagnosedglioblastomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT kohzukihidehiro highdoseprotonbeamtherapyversusconventionalfractionatedradiationtherapyfornewlydiagnosedglioblastomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT sugiinarushi highdoseprotonbeamtherapyversusconventionalfractionatedradiationtherapyfornewlydiagnosedglioblastomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT sakuraihideyuki highdoseprotonbeamtherapyversusconventionalfractionatedradiationtherapyfornewlydiagnosedglioblastomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT ishikawaeiichi highdoseprotonbeamtherapyversusconventionalfractionatedradiationtherapyfornewlydiagnosedglioblastomaapropensityscorematchinganalysis