Cargando…

Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT)

BACKGROUND: In 2014, the national population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program was implemented in the Netherlands. Biennial fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for hemoglobin (Hb) is used at a cut-off of 47 µg Hb per gram feces. The CRC screening program successfully started, with high...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breekveldt, Emilie C. H., Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther, de Jonge, Lucie, Spaander, Manon C. W., Dekker, Evelien, van Kemenade, Folkert J., van Vuuren, Anneke J., Ramakers, Christian R. B., Nagtegaal, Iris D., van Leerdam, Monique E., Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36814185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02670-1
_version_ 1784892755178160128
author Breekveldt, Emilie C. H.
Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther
de Jonge, Lucie
Spaander, Manon C. W.
Dekker, Evelien
van Kemenade, Folkert J.
van Vuuren, Anneke J.
Ramakers, Christian R. B.
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
van Leerdam, Monique E.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
author_facet Breekveldt, Emilie C. H.
Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther
de Jonge, Lucie
Spaander, Manon C. W.
Dekker, Evelien
van Kemenade, Folkert J.
van Vuuren, Anneke J.
Ramakers, Christian R. B.
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
van Leerdam, Monique E.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
author_sort Breekveldt, Emilie C. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2014, the national population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program was implemented in the Netherlands. Biennial fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for hemoglobin (Hb) is used at a cut-off of 47 µg Hb per gram feces. The CRC screening program successfully started, with high participation rates and yield of screening. Now that the program has reached a steady state, there is potential to further optimize the program. Previous studies showed that prior fecal Hb (f-Hb) concentrations just below the FIT cut-off are associated with a higher risk for detection of advanced neoplasia (AN) at subsequent screening rounds. We aim to achieve a better balance between the harms and benefits of CRC screening by offering participants tailored invitation intervals based on prior f-Hb concentrations after negative FIT. METHODS: This mixed-methods study will be performed within the Dutch national CRC screening program and will consist of: (1) a randomized controlled trial (RCT), (2) focus group studies, and (3) decision modelling. The primary outcome is the yield of AN per screened individual in personalized screening vs. uniform screening. Secondary outcomes are perspectives on, acceptability of and adherence to personalized screening, as well as long-term outcomes of personalized vs. uniform screening. The RCT will include 20,000 participants of the Dutch CRC screening program; 10,000 in the intervention and 10,000 in the control arm. The intervention arm will receive a personalized screening interval based on the prior f-Hb concentration (1, 2 or 3 years). The control arm will receive a screening interval according to current practice (2 years). The focus group studies are designed to understand individuals’ perspectives on and acceptability of personalized CRC screening. Results of the RCT will be incorporated into the MISCAN-Colon model to determine long-term benefits, harms, and costs of personalized vs. uniform CRC screening. DISCUSSION: The aim of this study is to evaluate the yield, feasibility, acceptability and (cost-) effectiveness of personalized CRC screening through tailored invitation intervals based on prior f-Hb concentrations. This knowledge may be of guidance for health policy makers and may provide evidence for implementing personalized CRC screening in The Netherlands and/or other countries using FIT as screening modality. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05423886, June 21, 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05423886 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-023-02670-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9948315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99483152023-02-24 Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT) Breekveldt, Emilie C. H. Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther de Jonge, Lucie Spaander, Manon C. W. Dekker, Evelien van Kemenade, Folkert J. van Vuuren, Anneke J. Ramakers, Christian R. B. Nagtegaal, Iris D. van Leerdam, Monique E. Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris BMC Gastroenterol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In 2014, the national population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program was implemented in the Netherlands. Biennial fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for hemoglobin (Hb) is used at a cut-off of 47 µg Hb per gram feces. The CRC screening program successfully started, with high participation rates and yield of screening. Now that the program has reached a steady state, there is potential to further optimize the program. Previous studies showed that prior fecal Hb (f-Hb) concentrations just below the FIT cut-off are associated with a higher risk for detection of advanced neoplasia (AN) at subsequent screening rounds. We aim to achieve a better balance between the harms and benefits of CRC screening by offering participants tailored invitation intervals based on prior f-Hb concentrations after negative FIT. METHODS: This mixed-methods study will be performed within the Dutch national CRC screening program and will consist of: (1) a randomized controlled trial (RCT), (2) focus group studies, and (3) decision modelling. The primary outcome is the yield of AN per screened individual in personalized screening vs. uniform screening. Secondary outcomes are perspectives on, acceptability of and adherence to personalized screening, as well as long-term outcomes of personalized vs. uniform screening. The RCT will include 20,000 participants of the Dutch CRC screening program; 10,000 in the intervention and 10,000 in the control arm. The intervention arm will receive a personalized screening interval based on the prior f-Hb concentration (1, 2 or 3 years). The control arm will receive a screening interval according to current practice (2 years). The focus group studies are designed to understand individuals’ perspectives on and acceptability of personalized CRC screening. Results of the RCT will be incorporated into the MISCAN-Colon model to determine long-term benefits, harms, and costs of personalized vs. uniform CRC screening. DISCUSSION: The aim of this study is to evaluate the yield, feasibility, acceptability and (cost-) effectiveness of personalized CRC screening through tailored invitation intervals based on prior f-Hb concentrations. This knowledge may be of guidance for health policy makers and may provide evidence for implementing personalized CRC screening in The Netherlands and/or other countries using FIT as screening modality. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05423886, June 21, 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05423886 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-023-02670-1. BioMed Central 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9948315/ /pubmed/36814185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02670-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Breekveldt, Emilie C. H.
Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther
de Jonge, Lucie
Spaander, Manon C. W.
Dekker, Evelien
van Kemenade, Folkert J.
van Vuuren, Anneke J.
Ramakers, Christian R. B.
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
van Leerdam, Monique E.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT)
title Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT)
title_full Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT)
title_fullStr Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT)
title_full_unstemmed Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT)
title_short Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT)
title_sort personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (perfect-fit)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36814185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02670-1
work_keys_str_mv AT breekveldtemiliech personalizedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolofamixedmethodsstudyontheeffectivenessoftailoredintervalsbasedonpriorfhbconcentrationinafitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogramperfectfit
AT toeszoutendijkesther personalizedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolofamixedmethodsstudyontheeffectivenessoftailoredintervalsbasedonpriorfhbconcentrationinafitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogramperfectfit
AT dejongelucie personalizedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolofamixedmethodsstudyontheeffectivenessoftailoredintervalsbasedonpriorfhbconcentrationinafitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogramperfectfit
AT spaandermanoncw personalizedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolofamixedmethodsstudyontheeffectivenessoftailoredintervalsbasedonpriorfhbconcentrationinafitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogramperfectfit
AT dekkerevelien personalizedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolofamixedmethodsstudyontheeffectivenessoftailoredintervalsbasedonpriorfhbconcentrationinafitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogramperfectfit
AT vankemenadefolkertj personalizedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolofamixedmethodsstudyontheeffectivenessoftailoredintervalsbasedonpriorfhbconcentrationinafitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogramperfectfit
AT vanvuurenannekej personalizedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolofamixedmethodsstudyontheeffectivenessoftailoredintervalsbasedonpriorfhbconcentrationinafitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogramperfectfit
AT ramakerschristianrb personalizedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolofamixedmethodsstudyontheeffectivenessoftailoredintervalsbasedonpriorfhbconcentrationinafitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogramperfectfit
AT nagtegaalirisd personalizedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolofamixedmethodsstudyontheeffectivenessoftailoredintervalsbasedonpriorfhbconcentrationinafitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogramperfectfit
AT vanleerdammoniquee personalizedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolofamixedmethodsstudyontheeffectivenessoftailoredintervalsbasedonpriorfhbconcentrationinafitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogramperfectfit
AT lansdorpvogelaariris personalizedcolorectalcancerscreeningstudyprotocolofamixedmethodsstudyontheeffectivenessoftailoredintervalsbasedonpriorfhbconcentrationinafitbasedcolorectalcancerscreeningprogramperfectfit