Cargando…

Intraoperative pressure sensors improve soft-tissue balance but not clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomized controlled trial

AIMS: Intraoperative pressure sensors allow surgeons to quantify soft-tissue balance during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine whether using sensors to achieve soft-tissue balance was more effective than manual balancing in improving outcomes in TKA. METHODS: A mul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MacDessi, Samuel J., Wood, Jil A., Diwan, Ashish, Harris, Ian A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35491577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.104B5.BJJ-2021-1299.R2
_version_ 1784892781722861568
author MacDessi, Samuel J.
Wood, Jil A.
Diwan, Ashish
Harris, Ian A.
author_facet MacDessi, Samuel J.
Wood, Jil A.
Diwan, Ashish
Harris, Ian A.
author_sort MacDessi, Samuel J.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Intraoperative pressure sensors allow surgeons to quantify soft-tissue balance during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine whether using sensors to achieve soft-tissue balance was more effective than manual balancing in improving outcomes in TKA. METHODS: A multicentre randomized trial compared the outcomes of sensor balancing (SB) with manual balancing (MB) in 250 patients (285 TKAs). The primary outcome measure was the mean difference in the four Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (ΔKOOS(4)) in the two groups, comparing the preoperative and two-year scores. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative balance data, additional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and functional measures. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in ΔKOOS(4) between the two groups at two years (mean difference 0.4 points (95% confidence interval (CI) -4.6 to 5.4); p = 0.869), and multiple regression found that SB was not associated with a significant ΔKOOS(4) (0.2-point increase (95% CI -5.1 to 4.6); p = 0.924). There were no significant differences between groups in other PROMs. Six-minute walking distance was significantly increased in the SB group (mean difference 29 metres; p = 0.015). Four-times as many TKAs were unbalanced in the MB group (36.8% MB vs 9.4% SB; p < 0.001). Irrespective of group assignment, no differences were found in any PROM when increasing ICPD thresholds defined balance. CONCLUSION: Despite improved quantitative soft-tissue balance, the use of sensors intraoperatively did not differentially improve the clinical or functional outcomes two years after TKA. These results question whether a more precisely balanced TKA that is guided by sensor data, and often achieved by more balancing interventions, will ultimately have a significant effect on clinical outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):604–612.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9948439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99484392023-02-24 Intraoperative pressure sensors improve soft-tissue balance but not clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomized controlled trial MacDessi, Samuel J. Wood, Jil A. Diwan, Ashish Harris, Ian A. Bone Joint J Knee AIMS: Intraoperative pressure sensors allow surgeons to quantify soft-tissue balance during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine whether using sensors to achieve soft-tissue balance was more effective than manual balancing in improving outcomes in TKA. METHODS: A multicentre randomized trial compared the outcomes of sensor balancing (SB) with manual balancing (MB) in 250 patients (285 TKAs). The primary outcome measure was the mean difference in the four Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (ΔKOOS(4)) in the two groups, comparing the preoperative and two-year scores. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative balance data, additional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and functional measures. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in ΔKOOS(4) between the two groups at two years (mean difference 0.4 points (95% confidence interval (CI) -4.6 to 5.4); p = 0.869), and multiple regression found that SB was not associated with a significant ΔKOOS(4) (0.2-point increase (95% CI -5.1 to 4.6); p = 0.924). There were no significant differences between groups in other PROMs. Six-minute walking distance was significantly increased in the SB group (mean difference 29 metres; p = 0.015). Four-times as many TKAs were unbalanced in the MB group (36.8% MB vs 9.4% SB; p < 0.001). Irrespective of group assignment, no differences were found in any PROM when increasing ICPD thresholds defined balance. CONCLUSION: Despite improved quantitative soft-tissue balance, the use of sensors intraoperatively did not differentially improve the clinical or functional outcomes two years after TKA. These results question whether a more precisely balanced TKA that is guided by sensor data, and often achieved by more balancing interventions, will ultimately have a significant effect on clinical outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):604–612. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2022-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9948439/ /pubmed/35491577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.104B5.BJJ-2021-1299.R2 Text en © 2022 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Knee
MacDessi, Samuel J.
Wood, Jil A.
Diwan, Ashish
Harris, Ian A.
Intraoperative pressure sensors improve soft-tissue balance but not clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title Intraoperative pressure sensors improve soft-tissue balance but not clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_full Intraoperative pressure sensors improve soft-tissue balance but not clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Intraoperative pressure sensors improve soft-tissue balance but not clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative pressure sensors improve soft-tissue balance but not clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_short Intraoperative pressure sensors improve soft-tissue balance but not clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_sort intraoperative pressure sensors improve soft-tissue balance but not clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomized controlled trial
topic Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35491577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.104B5.BJJ-2021-1299.R2
work_keys_str_mv AT macdessisamuelj intraoperativepressuresensorsimprovesofttissuebalancebutnotclinicaloutcomesintotalkneearthroplastyamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT woodjila intraoperativepressuresensorsimprovesofttissuebalancebutnotclinicaloutcomesintotalkneearthroplastyamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT diwanashish intraoperativepressuresensorsimprovesofttissuebalancebutnotclinicaloutcomesintotalkneearthroplastyamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT harrisiana intraoperativepressuresensorsimprovesofttissuebalancebutnotclinicaloutcomesintotalkneearthroplastyamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT intraoperativepressuresensorsimprovesofttissuebalancebutnotclinicaloutcomesintotalkneearthroplastyamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial