Cargando…

Use of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma

OBJECTIVES: Accurate diagnosis of cholesteatomas is crucial. However, cholesteatomas can easily be missed in routine otoscopic exams. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have performed well in medical image classification, so we evaluated their use for detecting cholesteatomas in otoscopic images....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tseng, Christopher C., Lim, Valerie, Jyung, Robert W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1008
_version_ 1784892807301824512
author Tseng, Christopher C.
Lim, Valerie
Jyung, Robert W.
author_facet Tseng, Christopher C.
Lim, Valerie
Jyung, Robert W.
author_sort Tseng, Christopher C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Accurate diagnosis of cholesteatomas is crucial. However, cholesteatomas can easily be missed in routine otoscopic exams. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have performed well in medical image classification, so we evaluated their use for detecting cholesteatomas in otoscopic images. STUDY DESIGN: Design and evaluation of artificial intelligence driven workflow for cholesteatoma diagnosis. METHODS: Otoscopic images collected from the faculty practice of the senior author were deidentified and labeled by the senior author as cholesteatoma, abnormal non‐cholesteatoma, or normal. An image classification workflow was developed to automatically differentiate cholesteatomas from other possible tympanic membrane appearances. Eight pretrained CNNs were trained on our otoscopic images, then tested on a withheld subset of images to evaluate their final performance. CNN intermediate activations were also extracted to visualize important image features. RESULTS: A total of 834 otoscopic images were collected, further categorized into 197 cholesteatoma, 457 abnormal non‐cholesteatoma, and 180 normal. Final trained CNNs demonstrated strong performance, achieving accuracies of 83.8%–98.5% for differentiating cholesteatoma from normal, 75.6%–90.1% for differentiating cholesteatoma from abnormal non‐cholesteatoma, and 87.0%–90.4% for differentiating cholesteatoma from non‐cholesteatoma (abnormal non‐cholesteatoma + normal). DenseNet201 (100% sensitivity, 97.1% specificity), NASNetLarge (100% sensitivity, 88.2% specificity), and MobileNetV2 (94.1% sensitivity, 100% specificity) were among the best performing CNNs in distinguishing cholesteatoma versus normal. Visualization of intermediate activations showed robust detection of relevant image features by the CNNs. CONCLUSION: While further refinement and more training images are needed to improve performance, artificial intelligence‐driven analysis of otoscopic images shows great promise as a diagnostic tool for detecting cholesteatomas. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9948563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99485632023-02-24 Use of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma Tseng, Christopher C. Lim, Valerie Jyung, Robert W. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: Accurate diagnosis of cholesteatomas is crucial. However, cholesteatomas can easily be missed in routine otoscopic exams. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have performed well in medical image classification, so we evaluated their use for detecting cholesteatomas in otoscopic images. STUDY DESIGN: Design and evaluation of artificial intelligence driven workflow for cholesteatoma diagnosis. METHODS: Otoscopic images collected from the faculty practice of the senior author were deidentified and labeled by the senior author as cholesteatoma, abnormal non‐cholesteatoma, or normal. An image classification workflow was developed to automatically differentiate cholesteatomas from other possible tympanic membrane appearances. Eight pretrained CNNs were trained on our otoscopic images, then tested on a withheld subset of images to evaluate their final performance. CNN intermediate activations were also extracted to visualize important image features. RESULTS: A total of 834 otoscopic images were collected, further categorized into 197 cholesteatoma, 457 abnormal non‐cholesteatoma, and 180 normal. Final trained CNNs demonstrated strong performance, achieving accuracies of 83.8%–98.5% for differentiating cholesteatoma from normal, 75.6%–90.1% for differentiating cholesteatoma from abnormal non‐cholesteatoma, and 87.0%–90.4% for differentiating cholesteatoma from non‐cholesteatoma (abnormal non‐cholesteatoma + normal). DenseNet201 (100% sensitivity, 97.1% specificity), NASNetLarge (100% sensitivity, 88.2% specificity), and MobileNetV2 (94.1% sensitivity, 100% specificity) were among the best performing CNNs in distinguishing cholesteatoma versus normal. Visualization of intermediate activations showed robust detection of relevant image features by the CNNs. CONCLUSION: While further refinement and more training images are needed to improve performance, artificial intelligence‐driven analysis of otoscopic images shows great promise as a diagnostic tool for detecting cholesteatomas. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9948563/ /pubmed/36846416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1008 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
Tseng, Christopher C.
Lim, Valerie
Jyung, Robert W.
Use of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma
title Use of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma
title_full Use of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma
title_fullStr Use of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma
title_full_unstemmed Use of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma
title_short Use of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma
title_sort use of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma
topic Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1008
work_keys_str_mv AT tsengchristopherc useofartificialintelligenceforthediagnosisofcholesteatoma
AT limvalerie useofartificialintelligenceforthediagnosisofcholesteatoma
AT jyungrobertw useofartificialintelligenceforthediagnosisofcholesteatoma