Cargando…
A study on the IOS application “uHear” as a screening tool for hearing loss in Bangkok
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the results of hearing tests performed using the uHear application with those of standard audiometry in Thai people in Bangkok. METHODS: From December 2018 to November 2019, a prospective observational study was conducted involving Thai participants aged...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.996 |
_version_ | 1784892809520611328 |
---|---|
author | Bunnag, Kanokrat Kaewsalubsri, Wikallaya Junthong, Sirinan Kulthaveesup, Anan |
author_facet | Bunnag, Kanokrat Kaewsalubsri, Wikallaya Junthong, Sirinan Kulthaveesup, Anan |
author_sort | Bunnag, Kanokrat |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the results of hearing tests performed using the uHear application with those of standard audiometry in Thai people in Bangkok. METHODS: From December 2018 to November 2019, a prospective observational study was conducted involving Thai participants aged between 18 and 80 years. All participants were tested using standard audiometry and the uHear application in a soundproof booth and in a typical hearing environment. RESULTS: This study included 52 participants (12 males and 40 females). The Bland–Altman plot with the Minimal Clinical Meaningful Difference of 10 dB between standard audiometry and the uHear in a soundproof booth found agreement at 2000 Hz. The uHear in a soundproof booth showed high sensitivity at all frequencies (82.5%–98.9%) and high specificity at 500 and 1000 Hz (85.7%–100%). uHear in a typical hearing environment showed high sensitivity at 4000 and 6000 Hz (97.6%) and high specificity at 500 and 1000 Hz (100%). When considering the pure‐tone average, uHear in a soundproof booth showed high sensitivity (94.7%) and specificity (90.7%), whereas, in a typical hearing environment, uHear showed poor sensitivity (34%) and high specificity (100%). CONCLUSION: uHear was accurate for hearing loss screening at 2000 Hz in a soundproof booth. However, uHear in a typical hearing environment lacked accuracy. The uHear application in a soundproof booth can be used to screen hearing loss in some situations where standard audiometry is impossible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9948572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99485722023-02-24 A study on the IOS application “uHear” as a screening tool for hearing loss in Bangkok Bunnag, Kanokrat Kaewsalubsri, Wikallaya Junthong, Sirinan Kulthaveesup, Anan Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the results of hearing tests performed using the uHear application with those of standard audiometry in Thai people in Bangkok. METHODS: From December 2018 to November 2019, a prospective observational study was conducted involving Thai participants aged between 18 and 80 years. All participants were tested using standard audiometry and the uHear application in a soundproof booth and in a typical hearing environment. RESULTS: This study included 52 participants (12 males and 40 females). The Bland–Altman plot with the Minimal Clinical Meaningful Difference of 10 dB between standard audiometry and the uHear in a soundproof booth found agreement at 2000 Hz. The uHear in a soundproof booth showed high sensitivity at all frequencies (82.5%–98.9%) and high specificity at 500 and 1000 Hz (85.7%–100%). uHear in a typical hearing environment showed high sensitivity at 4000 and 6000 Hz (97.6%) and high specificity at 500 and 1000 Hz (100%). When considering the pure‐tone average, uHear in a soundproof booth showed high sensitivity (94.7%) and specificity (90.7%), whereas, in a typical hearing environment, uHear showed poor sensitivity (34%) and high specificity (100%). CONCLUSION: uHear was accurate for hearing loss screening at 2000 Hz in a soundproof booth. However, uHear in a typical hearing environment lacked accuracy. The uHear application in a soundproof booth can be used to screen hearing loss in some situations where standard audiometry is impossible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9948572/ /pubmed/36846435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.996 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience Bunnag, Kanokrat Kaewsalubsri, Wikallaya Junthong, Sirinan Kulthaveesup, Anan A study on the IOS application “uHear” as a screening tool for hearing loss in Bangkok |
title | A study on the IOS application “uHear” as a screening tool for hearing loss in Bangkok |
title_full | A study on the IOS application “uHear” as a screening tool for hearing loss in Bangkok |
title_fullStr | A study on the IOS application “uHear” as a screening tool for hearing loss in Bangkok |
title_full_unstemmed | A study on the IOS application “uHear” as a screening tool for hearing loss in Bangkok |
title_short | A study on the IOS application “uHear” as a screening tool for hearing loss in Bangkok |
title_sort | study on the ios application “uhear” as a screening tool for hearing loss in bangkok |
topic | Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.996 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bunnagkanokrat astudyontheiosapplicationuhearasascreeningtoolforhearinglossinbangkok AT kaewsalubsriwikallaya astudyontheiosapplicationuhearasascreeningtoolforhearinglossinbangkok AT junthongsirinan astudyontheiosapplicationuhearasascreeningtoolforhearinglossinbangkok AT kulthaveesupanan astudyontheiosapplicationuhearasascreeningtoolforhearinglossinbangkok AT bunnagkanokrat studyontheiosapplicationuhearasascreeningtoolforhearinglossinbangkok AT kaewsalubsriwikallaya studyontheiosapplicationuhearasascreeningtoolforhearinglossinbangkok AT junthongsirinan studyontheiosapplicationuhearasascreeningtoolforhearinglossinbangkok AT kulthaveesupanan studyontheiosapplicationuhearasascreeningtoolforhearinglossinbangkok |