Cargando…

Investigation of biases in convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation using performance sensitivity analysis

The application of deep neural networks for segmentation in medical imaging has gained substantial interest in recent years. In many cases, this variant of machine learning has been shown to outperform other conventional segmentation approaches. However, little is known about its general applicabili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Güllmar, Daniel, Jacobsen, Nina, Deistung, Andreas, Timmann, Dagmar, Ropele, Stefan, Reichenbach, Jürgen R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35016819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.11.004
_version_ 1784892863915491328
author Güllmar, Daniel
Jacobsen, Nina
Deistung, Andreas
Timmann, Dagmar
Ropele, Stefan
Reichenbach, Jürgen R.
author_facet Güllmar, Daniel
Jacobsen, Nina
Deistung, Andreas
Timmann, Dagmar
Ropele, Stefan
Reichenbach, Jürgen R.
author_sort Güllmar, Daniel
collection PubMed
description The application of deep neural networks for segmentation in medical imaging has gained substantial interest in recent years. In many cases, this variant of machine learning has been shown to outperform other conventional segmentation approaches. However, little is known about its general applicability. Especially the robustness against image modifications (e.g., intensity variations, contrast variations, spatial alignment) has hardly been investigated. Data augmentation is often used to compensate for sensitivity to such changes, although its effectiveness has not yet been studied. Therefore, the goal of this study was to systematically investigate the sensitivity to variations in input data with respect to segmentation of medical images using deep learning. This approach was tested with two publicly available segmentation frameworks (DeepMedic and TractSeg). In the case of DeepMedic, the performance was tested using ground truth data, while in the case of TractSeg, the STAPLE technique was employed. In both cases, sensitivity analysis revealed significant dependence of the segmentation performance on input variations. The effects of different data augmentation strategies were also shown, making this type of analysis a useful tool for selecting the right parameters for augmentation. The proposed analysis should be applied to any deep learning image segmentation approach, unless the assessment of sensitivity to input variations can be directly derived from the network.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9948839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99488392023-02-23 Investigation of biases in convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation using performance sensitivity analysis Güllmar, Daniel Jacobsen, Nina Deistung, Andreas Timmann, Dagmar Ropele, Stefan Reichenbach, Jürgen R. Z Med Phys Original Paper The application of deep neural networks for segmentation in medical imaging has gained substantial interest in recent years. In many cases, this variant of machine learning has been shown to outperform other conventional segmentation approaches. However, little is known about its general applicability. Especially the robustness against image modifications (e.g., intensity variations, contrast variations, spatial alignment) has hardly been investigated. Data augmentation is often used to compensate for sensitivity to such changes, although its effectiveness has not yet been studied. Therefore, the goal of this study was to systematically investigate the sensitivity to variations in input data with respect to segmentation of medical images using deep learning. This approach was tested with two publicly available segmentation frameworks (DeepMedic and TractSeg). In the case of DeepMedic, the performance was tested using ground truth data, while in the case of TractSeg, the STAPLE technique was employed. In both cases, sensitivity analysis revealed significant dependence of the segmentation performance on input variations. The effects of different data augmentation strategies were also shown, making this type of analysis a useful tool for selecting the right parameters for augmentation. The proposed analysis should be applied to any deep learning image segmentation approach, unless the assessment of sensitivity to input variations can be directly derived from the network. Elsevier 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9948839/ /pubmed/35016819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.11.004 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier GmbH. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Güllmar, Daniel
Jacobsen, Nina
Deistung, Andreas
Timmann, Dagmar
Ropele, Stefan
Reichenbach, Jürgen R.
Investigation of biases in convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation using performance sensitivity analysis
title Investigation of biases in convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation using performance sensitivity analysis
title_full Investigation of biases in convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation using performance sensitivity analysis
title_fullStr Investigation of biases in convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation using performance sensitivity analysis
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of biases in convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation using performance sensitivity analysis
title_short Investigation of biases in convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation using performance sensitivity analysis
title_sort investigation of biases in convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation using performance sensitivity analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35016819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.11.004
work_keys_str_mv AT gullmardaniel investigationofbiasesinconvolutionalneuralnetworksforsemanticsegmentationusingperformancesensitivityanalysis
AT jacobsennina investigationofbiasesinconvolutionalneuralnetworksforsemanticsegmentationusingperformancesensitivityanalysis
AT deistungandreas investigationofbiasesinconvolutionalneuralnetworksforsemanticsegmentationusingperformancesensitivityanalysis
AT timmanndagmar investigationofbiasesinconvolutionalneuralnetworksforsemanticsegmentationusingperformancesensitivityanalysis
AT ropelestefan investigationofbiasesinconvolutionalneuralnetworksforsemanticsegmentationusingperformancesensitivityanalysis
AT reichenbachjurgenr investigationofbiasesinconvolutionalneuralnetworksforsemanticsegmentationusingperformancesensitivityanalysis