Quantification of the volume fraction of fat, water and bone mineral in spongiosa for red marrow dosimetry in molecular radiotherapy by using a dual-energy (SPECT/)CT

A patient-specific absorbed dose calculation for red marrow dosimetry requires quantifying patient-specific volume fractions of the red marrow, yellow marrow, and trabecular bone in the spongiosa of several skeletal sites. This quantification allows selecting appropriate S values calculated from the parameterized radiation transport models for bone and bone marrow dosimetry. Currently, no comprehensive, individualized, and non-invasive procedure is available for quantifying the volume fractions of red marrow, yellow marrow, and trabecular bone in the spongiosa. This study aims to provide a new quantitative method based on dual-energy computed tomography to fill this gap in red marrow dosimetry using a (SPECT/)CT system. METHODS: First, a method for parametrizing the photon attenuation coefficients relative to water was implemented. Next, a method to calculate the effective atomic number (Z(eff)) and effective mass density (ρ(eff)) using dual-energy CT (DECT) was employed. Lastly, two- and three-material decomposition using a dual-energy quantitative CT method (DEQCT) was performed in an anthropomorphic spine phantom and two bone samples of a boar, respectively. The measurements of Z(eff) and ρ(eff) were compared with the syngo.CT DE Rho/Z tool (Siemens Healthineers). Furthermore, the DEQCT method implemented in this study (DEQCT-I) was compared with a second DEQCT method based on the use of external material standards (DEQCT-II). DEQCT-II was used as reference method for calculating relative errors. RESULTS: The two-material decomposition in the anthropomorphic spine phantom presented a maximum relative error of −10% for the bone mineral density quantification. Furthermore, Z(eff) and ρ(eff) calculated by DEQCT-I differed from syngo.CT DE Rho/Z tool by less than 4.4% and 1.9%, respectively. The three-material decomposition in the two bone samples showed a maximum relative error of 21%, −17%, and 15% for the quantification of the volume fractions of fat, water, and bone mineral equivalent materials. Lastly, Z(eff) and ρ(eff) calculated by DEQCT-I differed from syngo.CT DE Rho/Z tool by less than 8.2% and 7.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows that quantifying the volume fraction of fat, water, and bone mineral using a phantom-independent and post-reconstruction DEQCT method is feasible. DEQCT-I has the advantage of not requiring prior information about the X-ray spectra or the detector sensitivity function, as is the case with spectral-based DEQCT methods. Instead, DEQCT-I, similar to other DEQCT methods depends on the chemical description of reference materials and a beam hardening correction function. DEQCT-I method provides an individualized and non-invasive procedure using a (SPECT/)CT system to apply S values based on the patient-specific volume fractions of yellow marrow, red marrow, and bone mineral in red marrow dosimetry.