Cargando…

An external perpendicular magnetic field does not influence survival and DNA damage after proton and carbon ion irradiation in human cancer cells

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic field effects on the radiobiological effectiveness during treatment of magnetic resonance (MRI) guided particle therapy are being debated. This study aims at assessing the influence of a perpendicular magnetic field on the biological effects in two human cancer cell...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kerschbaum-Gruber, Sylvia, Padilla-Cabal, Fatima, Mara, Elisabeth, Lohberger, Birgit, Georg, Dietmar, Fuchs, Hermann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35058110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.11.001
_version_ 1784892865101430784
author Kerschbaum-Gruber, Sylvia
Padilla-Cabal, Fatima
Mara, Elisabeth
Lohberger, Birgit
Georg, Dietmar
Fuchs, Hermann
author_facet Kerschbaum-Gruber, Sylvia
Padilla-Cabal, Fatima
Mara, Elisabeth
Lohberger, Birgit
Georg, Dietmar
Fuchs, Hermann
author_sort Kerschbaum-Gruber, Sylvia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic field effects on the radiobiological effectiveness during treatment of magnetic resonance (MRI) guided particle therapy are being debated. This study aims at assessing the influence of a perpendicular magnetic field on the biological effects in two human cancer cell lines irradiated with proton or carbon ions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In vitro cell irradiations were performed in water inside a perpendicular magnetic field of 0 and 1 T for both protons and carbon ions. Samples were located in the center of a spread-out Bragg peak at 8 cm water equivalent depth with a dose averaged linear energy transfer (LET(d)) of 4.2 or 83.4 keV/μm for protons and carbon ions, respectively. Physical dose levels of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 Gy were employed. The irradiation field was shifted and laterally enlarged, to compensate for the beam deflection due to the magnetic field and ensure consistent and homogenous irradiations of the flasks. The human cancer cell lines SKMel (Melanoma) and SW1353 (chondrosarcoma) were selected which represent a high and a low (α/β)(x) ratio cell type. Cell survival curves were generated applying a linear-quadratic curve fit. DNA damage and DNA damage clearance were assessed via γH2AX foci quantification at 1 and 24 h post radiation treatment. RESULTS: Without a magnetic field, RBE(10) values of 1.04 ± 0.03 (SW1353) and 1.51 ± 0.06 (SKMel) as well as RBE(80) values of 0.93 ± 0.15 (SW1353) and 2.28 ± 0.40 (SKMel) were calculated for protons. Carbon treatments yielded RBE(10) values of 1.68 ± 0.04 (SW1353) and 2.30 ± 0.07 (SKMel) and RBE(80) values of 2.19 ± 0.24 (SW1353) and 4.06 ± 0.33 (SKMel). For a field strength of B = 1 T, RBE(10) values of 1.06 ± 0.03 (SW1353) and 1.47 ± 0.06 (SKMel) resulted from protons, while RBE(10) values of 1.70 ± 0.05 (SW1353) and 2.37 ± 0.08 (SKMel) were obtained for carbon ions. RBE(80) values were calculated to be 1.06 ± 0.12 (SW1353) and 2.33 ± 0.40 (SKMel) following protons and 2.13 ± 0.25 (SW1353) and 4.29 ± 0.35 (SKMel) following carbon treatments. Substantially increased γH2AX foci per nucleus were found in both cell lines 1 h after radiation with both ion species. At the 24 h time point only carbon treated samples of both cell lines showed increased γH2AX levels. The presence of the magnetic field did neither influence the survival parameters of either cell line, nor initial DNA damage and DNA damage clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Applying a perpendicular magnetic field did not influence the cell survival, DNA repair, nor the biological effectiveness of protons or carbon ions in two human cancer cell lines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9948843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99488432023-02-23 An external perpendicular magnetic field does not influence survival and DNA damage after proton and carbon ion irradiation in human cancer cells Kerschbaum-Gruber, Sylvia Padilla-Cabal, Fatima Mara, Elisabeth Lohberger, Birgit Georg, Dietmar Fuchs, Hermann Z Med Phys Original Paper BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic field effects on the radiobiological effectiveness during treatment of magnetic resonance (MRI) guided particle therapy are being debated. This study aims at assessing the influence of a perpendicular magnetic field on the biological effects in two human cancer cell lines irradiated with proton or carbon ions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In vitro cell irradiations were performed in water inside a perpendicular magnetic field of 0 and 1 T for both protons and carbon ions. Samples were located in the center of a spread-out Bragg peak at 8 cm water equivalent depth with a dose averaged linear energy transfer (LET(d)) of 4.2 or 83.4 keV/μm for protons and carbon ions, respectively. Physical dose levels of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 Gy were employed. The irradiation field was shifted and laterally enlarged, to compensate for the beam deflection due to the magnetic field and ensure consistent and homogenous irradiations of the flasks. The human cancer cell lines SKMel (Melanoma) and SW1353 (chondrosarcoma) were selected which represent a high and a low (α/β)(x) ratio cell type. Cell survival curves were generated applying a linear-quadratic curve fit. DNA damage and DNA damage clearance were assessed via γH2AX foci quantification at 1 and 24 h post radiation treatment. RESULTS: Without a magnetic field, RBE(10) values of 1.04 ± 0.03 (SW1353) and 1.51 ± 0.06 (SKMel) as well as RBE(80) values of 0.93 ± 0.15 (SW1353) and 2.28 ± 0.40 (SKMel) were calculated for protons. Carbon treatments yielded RBE(10) values of 1.68 ± 0.04 (SW1353) and 2.30 ± 0.07 (SKMel) and RBE(80) values of 2.19 ± 0.24 (SW1353) and 4.06 ± 0.33 (SKMel). For a field strength of B = 1 T, RBE(10) values of 1.06 ± 0.03 (SW1353) and 1.47 ± 0.06 (SKMel) resulted from protons, while RBE(10) values of 1.70 ± 0.05 (SW1353) and 2.37 ± 0.08 (SKMel) were obtained for carbon ions. RBE(80) values were calculated to be 1.06 ± 0.12 (SW1353) and 2.33 ± 0.40 (SKMel) following protons and 2.13 ± 0.25 (SW1353) and 4.29 ± 0.35 (SKMel) following carbon treatments. Substantially increased γH2AX foci per nucleus were found in both cell lines 1 h after radiation with both ion species. At the 24 h time point only carbon treated samples of both cell lines showed increased γH2AX levels. The presence of the magnetic field did neither influence the survival parameters of either cell line, nor initial DNA damage and DNA damage clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Applying a perpendicular magnetic field did not influence the cell survival, DNA repair, nor the biological effectiveness of protons or carbon ions in two human cancer cell lines. Elsevier 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9948843/ /pubmed/35058110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.11.001 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier GmbH. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kerschbaum-Gruber, Sylvia
Padilla-Cabal, Fatima
Mara, Elisabeth
Lohberger, Birgit
Georg, Dietmar
Fuchs, Hermann
An external perpendicular magnetic field does not influence survival and DNA damage after proton and carbon ion irradiation in human cancer cells
title An external perpendicular magnetic field does not influence survival and DNA damage after proton and carbon ion irradiation in human cancer cells
title_full An external perpendicular magnetic field does not influence survival and DNA damage after proton and carbon ion irradiation in human cancer cells
title_fullStr An external perpendicular magnetic field does not influence survival and DNA damage after proton and carbon ion irradiation in human cancer cells
title_full_unstemmed An external perpendicular magnetic field does not influence survival and DNA damage after proton and carbon ion irradiation in human cancer cells
title_short An external perpendicular magnetic field does not influence survival and DNA damage after proton and carbon ion irradiation in human cancer cells
title_sort external perpendicular magnetic field does not influence survival and dna damage after proton and carbon ion irradiation in human cancer cells
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35058110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT kerschbaumgrubersylvia anexternalperpendicularmagneticfielddoesnotinfluencesurvivalanddnadamageafterprotonandcarbonionirradiationinhumancancercells
AT padillacabalfatima anexternalperpendicularmagneticfielddoesnotinfluencesurvivalanddnadamageafterprotonandcarbonionirradiationinhumancancercells
AT maraelisabeth anexternalperpendicularmagneticfielddoesnotinfluencesurvivalanddnadamageafterprotonandcarbonionirradiationinhumancancercells
AT lohbergerbirgit anexternalperpendicularmagneticfielddoesnotinfluencesurvivalanddnadamageafterprotonandcarbonionirradiationinhumancancercells
AT georgdietmar anexternalperpendicularmagneticfielddoesnotinfluencesurvivalanddnadamageafterprotonandcarbonionirradiationinhumancancercells
AT fuchshermann anexternalperpendicularmagneticfielddoesnotinfluencesurvivalanddnadamageafterprotonandcarbonionirradiationinhumancancercells
AT kerschbaumgrubersylvia externalperpendicularmagneticfielddoesnotinfluencesurvivalanddnadamageafterprotonandcarbonionirradiationinhumancancercells
AT padillacabalfatima externalperpendicularmagneticfielddoesnotinfluencesurvivalanddnadamageafterprotonandcarbonionirradiationinhumancancercells
AT maraelisabeth externalperpendicularmagneticfielddoesnotinfluencesurvivalanddnadamageafterprotonandcarbonionirradiationinhumancancercells
AT lohbergerbirgit externalperpendicularmagneticfielddoesnotinfluencesurvivalanddnadamageafterprotonandcarbonionirradiationinhumancancercells
AT georgdietmar externalperpendicularmagneticfielddoesnotinfluencesurvivalanddnadamageafterprotonandcarbonionirradiationinhumancancercells
AT fuchshermann externalperpendicularmagneticfielddoesnotinfluencesurvivalanddnadamageafterprotonandcarbonionirradiationinhumancancercells