Cargando…
Feasibility of a method for low contrast CT image quality assessment using difference detail curves for abdominal scans
This work describes a measurement method for assessing dose-related image-quality of CT scans based on the difference detail curve (DDC) method, and showcases its use in a low contrast setting. The method is based on a phantom consisting of elliptical slices of different sizes into which contrast ob...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35184974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.01.001 |
_version_ | 1784892867019276288 |
---|---|
author | Sommer, Christian Özden, Ismail Weyland, Mathias S. Duran, Carolina Lutters, Gerd Scheidegger, Stephan |
author_facet | Sommer, Christian Özden, Ismail Weyland, Mathias S. Duran, Carolina Lutters, Gerd Scheidegger, Stephan |
author_sort | Sommer, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | This work describes a measurement method for assessing dose-related image-quality of CT scans based on the difference detail curve (DDC) method, and showcases its use in a low contrast setting. The method is based on a phantom consisting of elliptical slices of different sizes into which contrast object modules can be inserted. These modules contain contrast objects based on (synthetic) resin mixtures with sucrose (native) or sodium iodine (contrast medium). Mixing ratios are provided to achieve a range of clinically relevant CT-numbers with these materials. The phantom is characterized in terms of contrast accuracy, energy dependency and long-term drift with satisfying results. Contrast accuracy and energy dependency are similar to that of water or soft tissue. Image quality of 655 scans of the phantom acquired at 30 different clinical institutions and with 16 different CT scanner models from 4 manufacturers was assessed by calculating a difference detail curve (DDC) from evaluation of up to 5 human observers using a custom-made software (RadiVates) described in this work. Based on these measurements, inter-observer variability was quantified using a bootstrap method and was shown to be a large contributor to the overall variability. This work demonstrates that assessment of CT image quality is feasible with the aforementioned phantom and DDC method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9948851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99488512023-02-23 Feasibility of a method for low contrast CT image quality assessment using difference detail curves for abdominal scans Sommer, Christian Özden, Ismail Weyland, Mathias S. Duran, Carolina Lutters, Gerd Scheidegger, Stephan Z Med Phys Original Paper This work describes a measurement method for assessing dose-related image-quality of CT scans based on the difference detail curve (DDC) method, and showcases its use in a low contrast setting. The method is based on a phantom consisting of elliptical slices of different sizes into which contrast object modules can be inserted. These modules contain contrast objects based on (synthetic) resin mixtures with sucrose (native) or sodium iodine (contrast medium). Mixing ratios are provided to achieve a range of clinically relevant CT-numbers with these materials. The phantom is characterized in terms of contrast accuracy, energy dependency and long-term drift with satisfying results. Contrast accuracy and energy dependency are similar to that of water or soft tissue. Image quality of 655 scans of the phantom acquired at 30 different clinical institutions and with 16 different CT scanner models from 4 manufacturers was assessed by calculating a difference detail curve (DDC) from evaluation of up to 5 human observers using a custom-made software (RadiVates) described in this work. Based on these measurements, inter-observer variability was quantified using a bootstrap method and was shown to be a large contributor to the overall variability. This work demonstrates that assessment of CT image quality is feasible with the aforementioned phantom and DDC method. Elsevier 2022-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9948851/ /pubmed/35184974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.01.001 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier GmbH on behalf of DGMP, ÖGMP and SSRMP. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Sommer, Christian Özden, Ismail Weyland, Mathias S. Duran, Carolina Lutters, Gerd Scheidegger, Stephan Feasibility of a method for low contrast CT image quality assessment using difference detail curves for abdominal scans |
title | Feasibility of a method for low contrast CT image quality assessment using difference detail curves for abdominal scans |
title_full | Feasibility of a method for low contrast CT image quality assessment using difference detail curves for abdominal scans |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of a method for low contrast CT image quality assessment using difference detail curves for abdominal scans |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of a method for low contrast CT image quality assessment using difference detail curves for abdominal scans |
title_short | Feasibility of a method for low contrast CT image quality assessment using difference detail curves for abdominal scans |
title_sort | feasibility of a method for low contrast ct image quality assessment using difference detail curves for abdominal scans |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35184974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.01.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sommerchristian feasibilityofamethodforlowcontrastctimagequalityassessmentusingdifferencedetailcurvesforabdominalscans AT ozdenismail feasibilityofamethodforlowcontrastctimagequalityassessmentusingdifferencedetailcurvesforabdominalscans AT weylandmathiass feasibilityofamethodforlowcontrastctimagequalityassessmentusingdifferencedetailcurvesforabdominalscans AT durancarolina feasibilityofamethodforlowcontrastctimagequalityassessmentusingdifferencedetailcurvesforabdominalscans AT luttersgerd feasibilityofamethodforlowcontrastctimagequalityassessmentusingdifferencedetailcurvesforabdominalscans AT scheideggerstephan feasibilityofamethodforlowcontrastctimagequalityassessmentusingdifferencedetailcurvesforabdominalscans |