Cargando…

Deep grey matter quantitative susceptibility mapping from small spatial coverages using deep learning

INTRODUCTION: Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) is generally acquired with full brain coverage, even though many QSM brain-iron studies focus on the deep grey matter (DGM) region only. Reducing the spatial coverage to the DGM vicinity can substantially shorten the scan time or enhance the sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Xuanyu, Gao, Yang, Liu, Feng, Crozier, Stuart, Sun, Hongfu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34312047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.06.004
_version_ 1784892870307610624
author Zhu, Xuanyu
Gao, Yang
Liu, Feng
Crozier, Stuart
Sun, Hongfu
author_facet Zhu, Xuanyu
Gao, Yang
Liu, Feng
Crozier, Stuart
Sun, Hongfu
author_sort Zhu, Xuanyu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) is generally acquired with full brain coverage, even though many QSM brain-iron studies focus on the deep grey matter (DGM) region only. Reducing the spatial coverage to the DGM vicinity can substantially shorten the scan time or enhance the spatial resolution without increasing scan time; however, this may lead to significant DGM susceptibility underestimation. METHOD: A recently proposed deep learning-based QSM method, namely xQSM, is investigated to assess the accuracy of dipole inversion on reduced brain coverages. The xQSM method is compared with two conventional dipole inversion methods using simulated and in vivo experiments from 4 healthy subjects at 3T. Pre-processed magnetic field maps are extended symmetrically from the centre of globus pallidus in the coronal plane to simulate QSM acquisitions of difference spatial coverages, ranging from 100% (∼32 mm) to 400% (∼128 mm) of the actual DGM physical size. RESULTS: The proposed xQSM network led to the lowest DGM contrast loss in both simulated and in vivo subjects, with the smallest susceptibility variation range across all spatial coverages. For the digital brain phantom simulation, xQSM improved the DGM susceptibility underestimation more than 20% in small spatial coverages, as compared to conventional methods. For the in vivo acquisition, less than 5% DGM susceptibility error was achieved in 48 mm axial slabs using the xQSM network, while a minimum of 112 mm coverage was required for conventional methods. It is also shown that the background field removal process performed worse in reduced brain coverages, which further deteriorated the subsequent dipole inversion. CONCLUSION: The recently proposed deep learning-based xQSM method significantly improves the accuracy of DGM QSM from small spatial coverages as compared with conventional QSM algorithms, which can shorten DGM QSM acquisition time substantially.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9948866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99488662023-02-23 Deep grey matter quantitative susceptibility mapping from small spatial coverages using deep learning Zhu, Xuanyu Gao, Yang Liu, Feng Crozier, Stuart Sun, Hongfu Z Med Phys Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) is generally acquired with full brain coverage, even though many QSM brain-iron studies focus on the deep grey matter (DGM) region only. Reducing the spatial coverage to the DGM vicinity can substantially shorten the scan time or enhance the spatial resolution without increasing scan time; however, this may lead to significant DGM susceptibility underestimation. METHOD: A recently proposed deep learning-based QSM method, namely xQSM, is investigated to assess the accuracy of dipole inversion on reduced brain coverages. The xQSM method is compared with two conventional dipole inversion methods using simulated and in vivo experiments from 4 healthy subjects at 3T. Pre-processed magnetic field maps are extended symmetrically from the centre of globus pallidus in the coronal plane to simulate QSM acquisitions of difference spatial coverages, ranging from 100% (∼32 mm) to 400% (∼128 mm) of the actual DGM physical size. RESULTS: The proposed xQSM network led to the lowest DGM contrast loss in both simulated and in vivo subjects, with the smallest susceptibility variation range across all spatial coverages. For the digital brain phantom simulation, xQSM improved the DGM susceptibility underestimation more than 20% in small spatial coverages, as compared to conventional methods. For the in vivo acquisition, less than 5% DGM susceptibility error was achieved in 48 mm axial slabs using the xQSM network, while a minimum of 112 mm coverage was required for conventional methods. It is also shown that the background field removal process performed worse in reduced brain coverages, which further deteriorated the subsequent dipole inversion. CONCLUSION: The recently proposed deep learning-based xQSM method significantly improves the accuracy of DGM QSM from small spatial coverages as compared with conventional QSM algorithms, which can shorten DGM QSM acquisition time substantially. Elsevier 2021-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9948866/ /pubmed/34312047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.06.004 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier GmbH on behalf of DGMP, ÖGMP and SSRMP. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Zhu, Xuanyu
Gao, Yang
Liu, Feng
Crozier, Stuart
Sun, Hongfu
Deep grey matter quantitative susceptibility mapping from small spatial coverages using deep learning
title Deep grey matter quantitative susceptibility mapping from small spatial coverages using deep learning
title_full Deep grey matter quantitative susceptibility mapping from small spatial coverages using deep learning
title_fullStr Deep grey matter quantitative susceptibility mapping from small spatial coverages using deep learning
title_full_unstemmed Deep grey matter quantitative susceptibility mapping from small spatial coverages using deep learning
title_short Deep grey matter quantitative susceptibility mapping from small spatial coverages using deep learning
title_sort deep grey matter quantitative susceptibility mapping from small spatial coverages using deep learning
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34312047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.06.004
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuxuanyu deepgreymatterquantitativesusceptibilitymappingfromsmallspatialcoveragesusingdeeplearning
AT gaoyang deepgreymatterquantitativesusceptibilitymappingfromsmallspatialcoveragesusingdeeplearning
AT liufeng deepgreymatterquantitativesusceptibilitymappingfromsmallspatialcoveragesusingdeeplearning
AT crozierstuart deepgreymatterquantitativesusceptibilitymappingfromsmallspatialcoveragesusingdeeplearning
AT sunhongfu deepgreymatterquantitativesusceptibilitymappingfromsmallspatialcoveragesusingdeeplearning