Cargando…

Evaluation of the inter- and intrafraction displacement for head patients treated at the particle therapy centre MedAustron based on the comparison of different commercial immobilisation devices

In December 2016 the clinical operation has started at the particle therapy centre MedAustron, Wiener Neustadt, Austria. Different commercial immobilisation devices are used for head patients. These immobilisation devices are a combination of table tops (Qfix BoS™ Headframe, Elekta HeadStep™), pillo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zechner, Andrea, Ziegler, Ingrid, Hug, Eugen, Lütgendorf-Caucig, Carola, Stock, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33640219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.01.007
_version_ 1784892872381693952
author Zechner, Andrea
Ziegler, Ingrid
Hug, Eugen
Lütgendorf-Caucig, Carola
Stock, Markus
author_facet Zechner, Andrea
Ziegler, Ingrid
Hug, Eugen
Lütgendorf-Caucig, Carola
Stock, Markus
author_sort Zechner, Andrea
collection PubMed
description In December 2016 the clinical operation has started at the particle therapy centre MedAustron, Wiener Neustadt, Austria. Different commercial immobilisation devices are used for head patients. These immobilisation devices are a combination of table tops (Qfix BoS™ Headframe, Elekta HeadStep™), pillows (BoS™ Standard pillow, Moldcare®, HeadStep™ pillow) and thermoplastic masks (Klarity Green™, Qfix Fibreplast™, HeadStep™ iCAST double). For each patient image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is performed by acquiring orthogonal X-ray imaging and 2D3D registration and the application of the resulting 6-degree of freedom (DOF) position correction on the robotic couch. The inter- and intrafraction displacement of 101 adult head patients and 27 paediatric sedated head patients were evaluated and compared among each other regarding reproducibility during the entire treatment and stability during each fraction. For the comparison, statistical methods (Shapiro–Wilk test, Mann–Whitney U-test) were applied on the position corrections as well as on the position verifications. The actual planning target volume margins of 3 mm (adults) and 2 mm (children) were evaluated by applying the van Herk formula on the intrafraction displacement results and performing treatment plan robustness simulations of twelve different translational offset scenarios including a HU uncertainty of 3.5%. Statistically significant differences between the immobilisation devices were found, but they turned out to be clinically irrelevant. The margin calculation for adult head patients resulted in 0.8 mm (lateral), 1.2 mm (cranio-caudal) and 0.6 mm (anterior–posterior), and for paediatric head patients under anaesthesia in 0.8 mm (lateral), 0.5 mm (cranio-caudal) and 0.9 mm (anterior–posterior). Based on these values, robustness evaluations of selected adult head patients and sedated children showed the validity of the currently used PTV margins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9948876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99488762023-02-23 Evaluation of the inter- and intrafraction displacement for head patients treated at the particle therapy centre MedAustron based on the comparison of different commercial immobilisation devices Zechner, Andrea Ziegler, Ingrid Hug, Eugen Lütgendorf-Caucig, Carola Stock, Markus Z Med Phys Original Paper In December 2016 the clinical operation has started at the particle therapy centre MedAustron, Wiener Neustadt, Austria. Different commercial immobilisation devices are used for head patients. These immobilisation devices are a combination of table tops (Qfix BoS™ Headframe, Elekta HeadStep™), pillows (BoS™ Standard pillow, Moldcare®, HeadStep™ pillow) and thermoplastic masks (Klarity Green™, Qfix Fibreplast™, HeadStep™ iCAST double). For each patient image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is performed by acquiring orthogonal X-ray imaging and 2D3D registration and the application of the resulting 6-degree of freedom (DOF) position correction on the robotic couch. The inter- and intrafraction displacement of 101 adult head patients and 27 paediatric sedated head patients were evaluated and compared among each other regarding reproducibility during the entire treatment and stability during each fraction. For the comparison, statistical methods (Shapiro–Wilk test, Mann–Whitney U-test) were applied on the position corrections as well as on the position verifications. The actual planning target volume margins of 3 mm (adults) and 2 mm (children) were evaluated by applying the van Herk formula on the intrafraction displacement results and performing treatment plan robustness simulations of twelve different translational offset scenarios including a HU uncertainty of 3.5%. Statistically significant differences between the immobilisation devices were found, but they turned out to be clinically irrelevant. The margin calculation for adult head patients resulted in 0.8 mm (lateral), 1.2 mm (cranio-caudal) and 0.6 mm (anterior–posterior), and for paediatric head patients under anaesthesia in 0.8 mm (lateral), 0.5 mm (cranio-caudal) and 0.9 mm (anterior–posterior). Based on these values, robustness evaluations of selected adult head patients and sedated children showed the validity of the currently used PTV margins. Elsevier 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9948876/ /pubmed/33640219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.01.007 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier GmbH on behalf of DGMP, ÖGMP and SSRMP. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Zechner, Andrea
Ziegler, Ingrid
Hug, Eugen
Lütgendorf-Caucig, Carola
Stock, Markus
Evaluation of the inter- and intrafraction displacement for head patients treated at the particle therapy centre MedAustron based on the comparison of different commercial immobilisation devices
title Evaluation of the inter- and intrafraction displacement for head patients treated at the particle therapy centre MedAustron based on the comparison of different commercial immobilisation devices
title_full Evaluation of the inter- and intrafraction displacement for head patients treated at the particle therapy centre MedAustron based on the comparison of different commercial immobilisation devices
title_fullStr Evaluation of the inter- and intrafraction displacement for head patients treated at the particle therapy centre MedAustron based on the comparison of different commercial immobilisation devices
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the inter- and intrafraction displacement for head patients treated at the particle therapy centre MedAustron based on the comparison of different commercial immobilisation devices
title_short Evaluation of the inter- and intrafraction displacement for head patients treated at the particle therapy centre MedAustron based on the comparison of different commercial immobilisation devices
title_sort evaluation of the inter- and intrafraction displacement for head patients treated at the particle therapy centre medaustron based on the comparison of different commercial immobilisation devices
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33640219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.01.007
work_keys_str_mv AT zechnerandrea evaluationoftheinterandintrafractiondisplacementforheadpatientstreatedattheparticletherapycentremedaustronbasedonthecomparisonofdifferentcommercialimmobilisationdevices
AT ziegleringrid evaluationoftheinterandintrafractiondisplacementforheadpatientstreatedattheparticletherapycentremedaustronbasedonthecomparisonofdifferentcommercialimmobilisationdevices
AT hugeugen evaluationoftheinterandintrafractiondisplacementforheadpatientstreatedattheparticletherapycentremedaustronbasedonthecomparisonofdifferentcommercialimmobilisationdevices
AT lutgendorfcaucigcarola evaluationoftheinterandintrafractiondisplacementforheadpatientstreatedattheparticletherapycentremedaustronbasedonthecomparisonofdifferentcommercialimmobilisationdevices
AT stockmarkus evaluationoftheinterandintrafractiondisplacementforheadpatientstreatedattheparticletherapycentremedaustronbasedonthecomparisonofdifferentcommercialimmobilisationdevices