Cargando…

Modeling ability to resist alcohol in the human laboratory: A pilot study

BACKGROUND: Roughly half of patients with alcohol use disorder prefer non-abstinence based approaches to treatment. However, only individuals who can limit their alcohol use after low-risk consumption are most likely to benefit from these approaches. This pilot study developed a laboratory-based int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sloan, Matthew E., Sells, Joanna R., Vaughan, Courtney L., Morris, James K., Ortega, Nancy E., Sundar, Sachin, Soundararajan, Soundarya, Stangl, Bethany L., Gowin, Joshua, Chawla, Sumedha, Diazgranados, Nancy, McKee, Sherry A., Waters, Andrew, Ramchandani, Vijay A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36844167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100105
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Roughly half of patients with alcohol use disorder prefer non-abstinence based approaches to treatment. However, only individuals who can limit their alcohol use after low-risk consumption are most likely to benefit from these approaches. This pilot study developed a laboratory-based intravenous alcohol self-administration paradigm to determine the characteristics of individuals who could successfully resist consuming alcohol after an initial exposure. METHODS: Seventeen non-treatment seeking heavy drinkers completed two versions of an intravenous alcohol self-administration paradigm designed to assess impaired control over alcohol use. In the paradigm, participants received a priming dose of alcohol and then entered a 120-min resist phase, in which they received monetary rewards if they resisted self-administering alcohol. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to determine the impact of craving and Impaired Control Scale scores on rate of lapse. RESULTS: 64.7% of participants across both versions of the paradigm were unable to resist alcohol for the duration of the session. Craving at baseline (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.13, p = 0.02) and following priming (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.15, p = 0.01) were associated with rate of lapse. Individuals who lapsed endorsed greater attempts to control their drinking over the prior six months compared to individuals who resisted. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence that craving may be predictive of risk of lapse in individuals who are trying to limit alcohol intake after consuming a small initial amount of alcohol. Future studies should test this paradigm in a larger and more diverse sample.