Cargando…
Evaluation of the Effect of Intubation Box use on Tracheal Intubation Difficulty with King Vision(®) and Truview Videolaryngoscope in Manikin in a Tertiary Care Hospital
BACKGROUND: The procedures of introducing an airway by intubation are associated with increased risk of aerosolisation of SARS-CoV-2 virus, posing a high risk to the personnel involved. Newer and novel methods such as the intubation box have been developed to increase the safety of healthcare worker...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sciendo
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9949008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846538 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/rjaic-2021-0004 |
_version_ | 1784892891617820672 |
---|---|
author | Nazir, Nazia |
author_facet | Nazir, Nazia |
author_sort | Nazir, Nazia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The procedures of introducing an airway by intubation are associated with increased risk of aerosolisation of SARS-CoV-2 virus, posing a high risk to the personnel involved. Newer and novel methods such as the intubation box have been developed to increase the safety of healthcare workers during intubation. METHODS (DESIGN): In this study, 33 anaesthesiologist and critical care specialists intubated the trachea of the airway manikin (US Laerdal Medical AS™) 4 times using a King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope and TRUVIEW PCD™ videolaryngoscope (with and without an intubation box as described by Lai). Intubation time was primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were first-pass intubation success rate, percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score and peak force to maxillary incisors. RESULTS: Intubation time and the number of times a click was heard during tracheal intubation were considerably higher in both groups when an intubation box was used (Table 1). When comparing the two laryngoscopes, the King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope enabled much less time to intubate than did the TRUVIEW laryngoscope, both with and without the intubation box. (P<0.001) In both laryngoscope groups, first-pass successful intubation was higher without the intubation box, although the difference was statistically insignificant. POGO score was not affected by intubation box but a higher score was observed with King Vision(®) laryngoscope (Tables 1,2). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that use of an intubation box makes intubation difficult and increases the time needed to perform it. King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope results in lesser intubation time and better glottic view as compared to TRUVIEW laryngoscope. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9949008 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Sciendo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99490082023-02-24 Evaluation of the Effect of Intubation Box use on Tracheal Intubation Difficulty with King Vision(®) and Truview Videolaryngoscope in Manikin in a Tertiary Care Hospital Nazir, Nazia Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care Original Article BACKGROUND: The procedures of introducing an airway by intubation are associated with increased risk of aerosolisation of SARS-CoV-2 virus, posing a high risk to the personnel involved. Newer and novel methods such as the intubation box have been developed to increase the safety of healthcare workers during intubation. METHODS (DESIGN): In this study, 33 anaesthesiologist and critical care specialists intubated the trachea of the airway manikin (US Laerdal Medical AS™) 4 times using a King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope and TRUVIEW PCD™ videolaryngoscope (with and without an intubation box as described by Lai). Intubation time was primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were first-pass intubation success rate, percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score and peak force to maxillary incisors. RESULTS: Intubation time and the number of times a click was heard during tracheal intubation were considerably higher in both groups when an intubation box was used (Table 1). When comparing the two laryngoscopes, the King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope enabled much less time to intubate than did the TRUVIEW laryngoscope, both with and without the intubation box. (P<0.001) In both laryngoscope groups, first-pass successful intubation was higher without the intubation box, although the difference was statistically insignificant. POGO score was not affected by intubation box but a higher score was observed with King Vision(®) laryngoscope (Tables 1,2). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that use of an intubation box makes intubation difficult and increases the time needed to perform it. King Vision(®) videolaryngoscope results in lesser intubation time and better glottic view as compared to TRUVIEW laryngoscope. Sciendo 2022-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9949008/ /pubmed/36846538 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/rjaic-2021-0004 Text en © 2021 Nazia Nazir, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nazir, Nazia Evaluation of the Effect of Intubation Box use on Tracheal Intubation Difficulty with King Vision(®) and Truview Videolaryngoscope in Manikin in a Tertiary Care Hospital |
title | Evaluation of the Effect of Intubation Box use on Tracheal Intubation Difficulty with King Vision(®) and Truview Videolaryngoscope in Manikin in a Tertiary Care Hospital |
title_full | Evaluation of the Effect of Intubation Box use on Tracheal Intubation Difficulty with King Vision(®) and Truview Videolaryngoscope in Manikin in a Tertiary Care Hospital |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Effect of Intubation Box use on Tracheal Intubation Difficulty with King Vision(®) and Truview Videolaryngoscope in Manikin in a Tertiary Care Hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Effect of Intubation Box use on Tracheal Intubation Difficulty with King Vision(®) and Truview Videolaryngoscope in Manikin in a Tertiary Care Hospital |
title_short | Evaluation of the Effect of Intubation Box use on Tracheal Intubation Difficulty with King Vision(®) and Truview Videolaryngoscope in Manikin in a Tertiary Care Hospital |
title_sort | evaluation of the effect of intubation box use on tracheal intubation difficulty with king vision(®) and truview videolaryngoscope in manikin in a tertiary care hospital |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9949008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846538 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/rjaic-2021-0004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nazirnazia evaluationoftheeffectofintubationboxuseontrachealintubationdifficultywithkingvisionandtruviewvideolaryngoscopeinmanikininatertiarycarehospital |