Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of Gua Sha, Cryostretch, and Positional Release Technique on Tenderness and Function in Subjects with Plantar Fasciitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Plantar fasciitis (PF) can be treated effectively with manual techniques like cryostretch (CS) and the positional release technique (PRT). Although Gua Sha (GS) has been suggested in the literature for PF, its efficacy has not been studied in the research. OBJECTIVE: To determine and com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jadhav, Aditi, Gurudut, Peeyoosha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Multimed Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9949612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36866182
http://dx.doi.org/10.3822/ijtmb.v16i1.749
_version_ 1784892981633875968
author Jadhav, Aditi
Gurudut, Peeyoosha
author_facet Jadhav, Aditi
Gurudut, Peeyoosha
author_sort Jadhav, Aditi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Plantar fasciitis (PF) can be treated effectively with manual techniques like cryostretch (CS) and the positional release technique (PRT). Although Gua Sha (GS) has been suggested in the literature for PF, its efficacy has not been studied in the research. OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the effectiveness of GS, CS, and PRT in subjects with PF in terms of pain intensity, pain pressure threshold, and foot function. METHODS/DESIGN: Thirty-six patients with PF (n=36) were randomly allocated to three study groups (12 in each group)—group GS, group CS, and group PRT, respectively. SETTINGS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted at physiotherapy OPD in a tertiary health center. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects of all genders with plantar fasciitis of the age group 20–60 years. Thirty-six subjects with plantar fasciitis out of whom 12 were males and 24 females. There were no dropouts in this study. INTERVENTION: The interventions included the Gua Sha technique (1 session), the cryostretch technique with a frozen tennis ball (3 sessions), and the positional release technique (7 sessions), along with common exercises for all three groups. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain intensity, foot functions, and pain pressure threshold were assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Foot Function Index, and pressure algometer, respectively, on day 1 (pre-intervention) and day 7 (post-intervention). RESULTS: Between-group analyses showed that group GS was more effective than CS and PRT for pain (p=.0001), group CS was more effective than GS and PRT for foot function (p=.0001) whereas group PRT was more effective than GS and CS for pain pressure threshold (p=.0001). CONCLUSION: Although all three groups showed improvement, Gua Sha was superior in terms of reducing pain, cryostretch for improving foot functions, and PRT for reducing tenderness. The interventions used in this study are cost-effective and have proved to be simple and safe techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9949612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Multimed Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99496122023-03-01 Comparative Effectiveness of Gua Sha, Cryostretch, and Positional Release Technique on Tenderness and Function in Subjects with Plantar Fasciitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial Jadhav, Aditi Gurudut, Peeyoosha Int J Ther Massage Bodywork Research BACKGROUND: Plantar fasciitis (PF) can be treated effectively with manual techniques like cryostretch (CS) and the positional release technique (PRT). Although Gua Sha (GS) has been suggested in the literature for PF, its efficacy has not been studied in the research. OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the effectiveness of GS, CS, and PRT in subjects with PF in terms of pain intensity, pain pressure threshold, and foot function. METHODS/DESIGN: Thirty-six patients with PF (n=36) were randomly allocated to three study groups (12 in each group)—group GS, group CS, and group PRT, respectively. SETTINGS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted at physiotherapy OPD in a tertiary health center. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects of all genders with plantar fasciitis of the age group 20–60 years. Thirty-six subjects with plantar fasciitis out of whom 12 were males and 24 females. There were no dropouts in this study. INTERVENTION: The interventions included the Gua Sha technique (1 session), the cryostretch technique with a frozen tennis ball (3 sessions), and the positional release technique (7 sessions), along with common exercises for all three groups. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain intensity, foot functions, and pain pressure threshold were assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Foot Function Index, and pressure algometer, respectively, on day 1 (pre-intervention) and day 7 (post-intervention). RESULTS: Between-group analyses showed that group GS was more effective than CS and PRT for pain (p=.0001), group CS was more effective than GS and PRT for foot function (p=.0001) whereas group PRT was more effective than GS and CS for pain pressure threshold (p=.0001). CONCLUSION: Although all three groups showed improvement, Gua Sha was superior in terms of reducing pain, cryostretch for improving foot functions, and PRT for reducing tenderness. The interventions used in this study are cost-effective and have proved to be simple and safe techniques. Multimed Inc. 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9949612/ /pubmed/36866182 http://dx.doi.org/10.3822/ijtmb.v16i1.749 Text en Copyright© The Author(s) 2023. Published by the Massage Therapy Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/Published under the CreativeCommons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Jadhav, Aditi
Gurudut, Peeyoosha
Comparative Effectiveness of Gua Sha, Cryostretch, and Positional Release Technique on Tenderness and Function in Subjects with Plantar Fasciitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title Comparative Effectiveness of Gua Sha, Cryostretch, and Positional Release Technique on Tenderness and Function in Subjects with Plantar Fasciitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Gua Sha, Cryostretch, and Positional Release Technique on Tenderness and Function in Subjects with Plantar Fasciitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Gua Sha, Cryostretch, and Positional Release Technique on Tenderness and Function in Subjects with Plantar Fasciitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Gua Sha, Cryostretch, and Positional Release Technique on Tenderness and Function in Subjects with Plantar Fasciitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Gua Sha, Cryostretch, and Positional Release Technique on Tenderness and Function in Subjects with Plantar Fasciitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort comparative effectiveness of gua sha, cryostretch, and positional release technique on tenderness and function in subjects with plantar fasciitis: a randomized clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9949612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36866182
http://dx.doi.org/10.3822/ijtmb.v16i1.749
work_keys_str_mv AT jadhavaditi comparativeeffectivenessofguashacryostretchandpositionalreleasetechniqueontendernessandfunctioninsubjectswithplantarfasciitisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gurudutpeeyoosha comparativeeffectivenessofguashacryostretchandpositionalreleasetechniqueontendernessandfunctioninsubjectswithplantarfasciitisarandomizedclinicaltrial