Cargando…

Evaluation of surgical complexity by automated surgical process recognition in robotic distal gastrectomy using artificial intelligence

BACKGROUND: Although radical gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for gastric cancer, the complication rate remains high. Thus, estimation of surgical complexity is required for safety. We aim to investigate the association between the surgical process and complexity, suc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takeuchi, Masashi, Kawakubo, Hirofumi, Tsuji, Takayuki, Maeda, Yusuke, Matsuda, Satoru, Fukuda, Kazumasa, Nakamura, Rieko, Kitagawa, Yuko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9949687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36823363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09924-9
_version_ 1784892999810940928
author Takeuchi, Masashi
Kawakubo, Hirofumi
Tsuji, Takayuki
Maeda, Yusuke
Matsuda, Satoru
Fukuda, Kazumasa
Nakamura, Rieko
Kitagawa, Yuko
author_facet Takeuchi, Masashi
Kawakubo, Hirofumi
Tsuji, Takayuki
Maeda, Yusuke
Matsuda, Satoru
Fukuda, Kazumasa
Nakamura, Rieko
Kitagawa, Yuko
author_sort Takeuchi, Masashi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although radical gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for gastric cancer, the complication rate remains high. Thus, estimation of surgical complexity is required for safety. We aim to investigate the association between the surgical process and complexity, such as a risk of complications in robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG), to establish an artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated surgical phase recognition by analyzing robotic surgical videos, and to investigate the predictability of surgical complexity by AI. METHOD: This study assessed clinical data and robotic surgical videos for 56 patients who underwent RDG for gastric cancer. We investigated (1) the relationship between surgical complexity and perioperative factors (patient characteristics, surgical process); (2) AI training for automated phase recognition and model performance was assessed by comparing predictions to the surgeon-annotated reference; (3) AI model predictability for surgical complexity was calculated by the area under the curve. RESULT: Surgical complexity score comprised extended total surgical duration, bleeding, and complications and was strongly associated with the intraoperative surgical process, especially in the beginning phases (area under the curve 0.913). We established an AI model that can recognize surgical phases from video with 87% accuracy; AI can determine intraoperative surgical complexity by calculating the duration of beginning phases from phases 1–3 (area under the curve 0.859). CONCLUSION: Surgical complexity, as a surrogate of short-term outcomes, can be predicted by the surgical process, especially in the extended duration of beginning phases. Surgical complexity can also be evaluated with automation using our artificial intelligence-based model. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-09924-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9949687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99496872023-02-24 Evaluation of surgical complexity by automated surgical process recognition in robotic distal gastrectomy using artificial intelligence Takeuchi, Masashi Kawakubo, Hirofumi Tsuji, Takayuki Maeda, Yusuke Matsuda, Satoru Fukuda, Kazumasa Nakamura, Rieko Kitagawa, Yuko Surg Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND: Although radical gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for gastric cancer, the complication rate remains high. Thus, estimation of surgical complexity is required for safety. We aim to investigate the association between the surgical process and complexity, such as a risk of complications in robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG), to establish an artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated surgical phase recognition by analyzing robotic surgical videos, and to investigate the predictability of surgical complexity by AI. METHOD: This study assessed clinical data and robotic surgical videos for 56 patients who underwent RDG for gastric cancer. We investigated (1) the relationship between surgical complexity and perioperative factors (patient characteristics, surgical process); (2) AI training for automated phase recognition and model performance was assessed by comparing predictions to the surgeon-annotated reference; (3) AI model predictability for surgical complexity was calculated by the area under the curve. RESULT: Surgical complexity score comprised extended total surgical duration, bleeding, and complications and was strongly associated with the intraoperative surgical process, especially in the beginning phases (area under the curve 0.913). We established an AI model that can recognize surgical phases from video with 87% accuracy; AI can determine intraoperative surgical complexity by calculating the duration of beginning phases from phases 1–3 (area under the curve 0.859). CONCLUSION: Surgical complexity, as a surrogate of short-term outcomes, can be predicted by the surgical process, especially in the extended duration of beginning phases. Surgical complexity can also be evaluated with automation using our artificial intelligence-based model. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-09924-9. Springer US 2023-02-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9949687/ /pubmed/36823363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09924-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Takeuchi, Masashi
Kawakubo, Hirofumi
Tsuji, Takayuki
Maeda, Yusuke
Matsuda, Satoru
Fukuda, Kazumasa
Nakamura, Rieko
Kitagawa, Yuko
Evaluation of surgical complexity by automated surgical process recognition in robotic distal gastrectomy using artificial intelligence
title Evaluation of surgical complexity by automated surgical process recognition in robotic distal gastrectomy using artificial intelligence
title_full Evaluation of surgical complexity by automated surgical process recognition in robotic distal gastrectomy using artificial intelligence
title_fullStr Evaluation of surgical complexity by automated surgical process recognition in robotic distal gastrectomy using artificial intelligence
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of surgical complexity by automated surgical process recognition in robotic distal gastrectomy using artificial intelligence
title_short Evaluation of surgical complexity by automated surgical process recognition in robotic distal gastrectomy using artificial intelligence
title_sort evaluation of surgical complexity by automated surgical process recognition in robotic distal gastrectomy using artificial intelligence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9949687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36823363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09924-9
work_keys_str_mv AT takeuchimasashi evaluationofsurgicalcomplexitybyautomatedsurgicalprocessrecognitioninroboticdistalgastrectomyusingartificialintelligence
AT kawakubohirofumi evaluationofsurgicalcomplexitybyautomatedsurgicalprocessrecognitioninroboticdistalgastrectomyusingartificialintelligence
AT tsujitakayuki evaluationofsurgicalcomplexitybyautomatedsurgicalprocessrecognitioninroboticdistalgastrectomyusingartificialintelligence
AT maedayusuke evaluationofsurgicalcomplexitybyautomatedsurgicalprocessrecognitioninroboticdistalgastrectomyusingartificialintelligence
AT matsudasatoru evaluationofsurgicalcomplexitybyautomatedsurgicalprocessrecognitioninroboticdistalgastrectomyusingartificialintelligence
AT fukudakazumasa evaluationofsurgicalcomplexitybyautomatedsurgicalprocessrecognitioninroboticdistalgastrectomyusingartificialintelligence
AT nakamurarieko evaluationofsurgicalcomplexitybyautomatedsurgicalprocessrecognitioninroboticdistalgastrectomyusingartificialintelligence
AT kitagawayuko evaluationofsurgicalcomplexitybyautomatedsurgicalprocessrecognitioninroboticdistalgastrectomyusingartificialintelligence