Cargando…

Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review

Background and study aims  Credentialing, the process through which an institution assesses and validates an endoscopist’s qualifications to independently perform a procedure, can vary by region and country. Little is known about these inter-societal and geographic differences. We aimed to systemati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabrie, Nasruddin, Khan, Rishad, Seleq, Samir, Homsi, Hoomam, Gimpaya, Nikko, Bansal, Rishi, Scaffidi, Michael A., Lightfoot, David, Grover, Samir C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9949985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36845269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1981-3047
_version_ 1784893064997765120
author Sabrie, Nasruddin
Khan, Rishad
Seleq, Samir
Homsi, Hoomam
Gimpaya, Nikko
Bansal, Rishi
Scaffidi, Michael A.
Lightfoot, David
Grover, Samir C.
author_facet Sabrie, Nasruddin
Khan, Rishad
Seleq, Samir
Homsi, Hoomam
Gimpaya, Nikko
Bansal, Rishi
Scaffidi, Michael A.
Lightfoot, David
Grover, Samir C.
author_sort Sabrie, Nasruddin
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Credentialing, the process through which an institution assesses and validates an endoscopist’s qualifications to independently perform a procedure, can vary by region and country. Little is known about these inter-societal and geographic differences. We aimed to systematically characterize credentialing recommendations and requirements worldwide. Methods  We conducted a systematic review of credentialing practices among gastrointestinal and endoscopy societies worldwide. An electronic search as well as hand-search of World Endoscopy Organization members’ websites was performed for credentialing documents. Abstracts were screened in duplicate and independently. Data were collected on procedures included in each document (e. g. colonoscopy, ERCP) and types of credentialing statements (procedural volume, key performance indicators (KPIs), and competency assessments). The primary objective was to qualitatively describe and compare the available credentialing recommendations and requirements from the included studies. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data when appropriate. Results  We screened 653 records and included 20 credentialing documents from 12 societies. Guidelines most commonly included credentialing statements for colonoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and ERCP. For colonoscopy, minimum procedural volumes ranged from 150 to 275 and adenoma detection rate (ADR) from 20 % to 30%. For EGD, minimum procedural volumes ranged from 130 to 1000, and duodenal intubation rate of 95 % to 100%. For ERCP, minimum procedural volumes ranged from 100 to 300 with selective duct cannulation success rate of 80 % to 90 %. Guidelines also reported on flexible sigmoidoscopy, capsule endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound. Conclusions  While some metrics such as ADR were relatively consistent among societies, there was substantial variation among societies with respect to procedural volume and KPI statements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9949985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99499852023-02-24 Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review Sabrie, Nasruddin Khan, Rishad Seleq, Samir Homsi, Hoomam Gimpaya, Nikko Bansal, Rishi Scaffidi, Michael A. Lightfoot, David Grover, Samir C. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Credentialing, the process through which an institution assesses and validates an endoscopist’s qualifications to independently perform a procedure, can vary by region and country. Little is known about these inter-societal and geographic differences. We aimed to systematically characterize credentialing recommendations and requirements worldwide. Methods  We conducted a systematic review of credentialing practices among gastrointestinal and endoscopy societies worldwide. An electronic search as well as hand-search of World Endoscopy Organization members’ websites was performed for credentialing documents. Abstracts were screened in duplicate and independently. Data were collected on procedures included in each document (e. g. colonoscopy, ERCP) and types of credentialing statements (procedural volume, key performance indicators (KPIs), and competency assessments). The primary objective was to qualitatively describe and compare the available credentialing recommendations and requirements from the included studies. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data when appropriate. Results  We screened 653 records and included 20 credentialing documents from 12 societies. Guidelines most commonly included credentialing statements for colonoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and ERCP. For colonoscopy, minimum procedural volumes ranged from 150 to 275 and adenoma detection rate (ADR) from 20 % to 30%. For EGD, minimum procedural volumes ranged from 130 to 1000, and duodenal intubation rate of 95 % to 100%. For ERCP, minimum procedural volumes ranged from 100 to 300 with selective duct cannulation success rate of 80 % to 90 %. Guidelines also reported on flexible sigmoidoscopy, capsule endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound. Conclusions  While some metrics such as ADR were relatively consistent among societies, there was substantial variation among societies with respect to procedural volume and KPI statements. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9949985/ /pubmed/36845269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1981-3047 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Sabrie, Nasruddin
Khan, Rishad
Seleq, Samir
Homsi, Hoomam
Gimpaya, Nikko
Bansal, Rishi
Scaffidi, Michael A.
Lightfoot, David
Grover, Samir C.
Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review
title Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review
title_full Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review
title_fullStr Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review
title_short Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review
title_sort global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9949985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36845269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1981-3047
work_keys_str_mv AT sabrienasruddin globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview
AT khanrishad globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview
AT seleqsamir globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview
AT homsihoomam globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview
AT gimpayanikko globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview
AT bansalrishi globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview
AT scaffidimichaela globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview
AT lightfootdavid globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview
AT groversamirc globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview