Cargando…
Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review
Background and study aims Credentialing, the process through which an institution assesses and validates an endoscopist’s qualifications to independently perform a procedure, can vary by region and country. Little is known about these inter-societal and geographic differences. We aimed to systemati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9949985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36845269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1981-3047 |
_version_ | 1784893064997765120 |
---|---|
author | Sabrie, Nasruddin Khan, Rishad Seleq, Samir Homsi, Hoomam Gimpaya, Nikko Bansal, Rishi Scaffidi, Michael A. Lightfoot, David Grover, Samir C. |
author_facet | Sabrie, Nasruddin Khan, Rishad Seleq, Samir Homsi, Hoomam Gimpaya, Nikko Bansal, Rishi Scaffidi, Michael A. Lightfoot, David Grover, Samir C. |
author_sort | Sabrie, Nasruddin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Credentialing, the process through which an institution assesses and validates an endoscopist’s qualifications to independently perform a procedure, can vary by region and country. Little is known about these inter-societal and geographic differences. We aimed to systematically characterize credentialing recommendations and requirements worldwide. Methods We conducted a systematic review of credentialing practices among gastrointestinal and endoscopy societies worldwide. An electronic search as well as hand-search of World Endoscopy Organization members’ websites was performed for credentialing documents. Abstracts were screened in duplicate and independently. Data were collected on procedures included in each document (e. g. colonoscopy, ERCP) and types of credentialing statements (procedural volume, key performance indicators (KPIs), and competency assessments). The primary objective was to qualitatively describe and compare the available credentialing recommendations and requirements from the included studies. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data when appropriate. Results We screened 653 records and included 20 credentialing documents from 12 societies. Guidelines most commonly included credentialing statements for colonoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and ERCP. For colonoscopy, minimum procedural volumes ranged from 150 to 275 and adenoma detection rate (ADR) from 20 % to 30%. For EGD, minimum procedural volumes ranged from 130 to 1000, and duodenal intubation rate of 95 % to 100%. For ERCP, minimum procedural volumes ranged from 100 to 300 with selective duct cannulation success rate of 80 % to 90 %. Guidelines also reported on flexible sigmoidoscopy, capsule endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound. Conclusions While some metrics such as ADR were relatively consistent among societies, there was substantial variation among societies with respect to procedural volume and KPI statements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9949985 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99499852023-02-24 Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review Sabrie, Nasruddin Khan, Rishad Seleq, Samir Homsi, Hoomam Gimpaya, Nikko Bansal, Rishi Scaffidi, Michael A. Lightfoot, David Grover, Samir C. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Credentialing, the process through which an institution assesses and validates an endoscopist’s qualifications to independently perform a procedure, can vary by region and country. Little is known about these inter-societal and geographic differences. We aimed to systematically characterize credentialing recommendations and requirements worldwide. Methods We conducted a systematic review of credentialing practices among gastrointestinal and endoscopy societies worldwide. An electronic search as well as hand-search of World Endoscopy Organization members’ websites was performed for credentialing documents. Abstracts were screened in duplicate and independently. Data were collected on procedures included in each document (e. g. colonoscopy, ERCP) and types of credentialing statements (procedural volume, key performance indicators (KPIs), and competency assessments). The primary objective was to qualitatively describe and compare the available credentialing recommendations and requirements from the included studies. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data when appropriate. Results We screened 653 records and included 20 credentialing documents from 12 societies. Guidelines most commonly included credentialing statements for colonoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and ERCP. For colonoscopy, minimum procedural volumes ranged from 150 to 275 and adenoma detection rate (ADR) from 20 % to 30%. For EGD, minimum procedural volumes ranged from 130 to 1000, and duodenal intubation rate of 95 % to 100%. For ERCP, minimum procedural volumes ranged from 100 to 300 with selective duct cannulation success rate of 80 % to 90 %. Guidelines also reported on flexible sigmoidoscopy, capsule endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound. Conclusions While some metrics such as ADR were relatively consistent among societies, there was substantial variation among societies with respect to procedural volume and KPI statements. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9949985/ /pubmed/36845269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1981-3047 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Sabrie, Nasruddin Khan, Rishad Seleq, Samir Homsi, Hoomam Gimpaya, Nikko Bansal, Rishi Scaffidi, Michael A. Lightfoot, David Grover, Samir C. Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review |
title | Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review |
title_full | Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review |
title_short | Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review |
title_sort | global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9949985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36845269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1981-3047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sabrienasruddin globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview AT khanrishad globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview AT seleqsamir globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview AT homsihoomam globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview AT gimpayanikko globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview AT bansalrishi globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview AT scaffidimichaela globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview AT lightfootdavid globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview AT groversamirc globaltrendsintrainingandcredentialingguidelinesforgastrointestinalendoscopyasystematicreview |