Cargando…
Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT
Distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) motion analysis using dynamic CT is gaining popularity. Following scanning and segmentation, 3D bone models are registered to (4D-)CT target frames. Imaging errors like low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), limited Z-coverage and motion artefacts influence registration, ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36823242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29726-2 |
_version_ | 1784893083814461440 |
---|---|
author | Oonk, J. G. M. Dobbe, J. G. G. Strackee, S. D. Strijkers, G. J. Streekstra, G. J. |
author_facet | Oonk, J. G. M. Dobbe, J. G. G. Strackee, S. D. Strijkers, G. J. Streekstra, G. J. |
author_sort | Oonk, J. G. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) motion analysis using dynamic CT is gaining popularity. Following scanning and segmentation, 3D bone models are registered to (4D-)CT target frames. Imaging errors like low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), limited Z-coverage and motion artefacts influence registration, causing misinterpretation of joint motion. This necessitates quantification of the methodological error. A cadaver arm and dynamic phantom were subjected to multiple 4D-CT scans, while varying tube charge-time product and phantom angular velocity, to evaluate the effects of SNR and motion artefacts on registration accuracy and precision. 4D-CT Z-coverage is limited by the scanner. To quantify the effects of different Z-coverages on registration accuracy and precision, 4D-CT was simulated by acquiring multiple spiral 3D-CT scans of the cadaver arm. Z-coverage was varied by clipping the 3D bone models prior to registration. The radius position relative to the ulna was obtained from the segmentation image. Apparent relative displacement seen in the target images is caused by registration errors. Worst-case translations were 0.45, 0.08 and 1.1 mm for SNR-, Z-coverage- and motion-related errors respectively. Worst-case rotations were 0.41, 0.13 and 6.0 degrees. This study showed that quantification of the methodological error enables composition of accurate and precise DRUJ motion scanning protocols. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9950078 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99500782023-02-25 Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT Oonk, J. G. M. Dobbe, J. G. G. Strackee, S. D. Strijkers, G. J. Streekstra, G. J. Sci Rep Article Distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) motion analysis using dynamic CT is gaining popularity. Following scanning and segmentation, 3D bone models are registered to (4D-)CT target frames. Imaging errors like low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), limited Z-coverage and motion artefacts influence registration, causing misinterpretation of joint motion. This necessitates quantification of the methodological error. A cadaver arm and dynamic phantom were subjected to multiple 4D-CT scans, while varying tube charge-time product and phantom angular velocity, to evaluate the effects of SNR and motion artefacts on registration accuracy and precision. 4D-CT Z-coverage is limited by the scanner. To quantify the effects of different Z-coverages on registration accuracy and precision, 4D-CT was simulated by acquiring multiple spiral 3D-CT scans of the cadaver arm. Z-coverage was varied by clipping the 3D bone models prior to registration. The radius position relative to the ulna was obtained from the segmentation image. Apparent relative displacement seen in the target images is caused by registration errors. Worst-case translations were 0.45, 0.08 and 1.1 mm for SNR-, Z-coverage- and motion-related errors respectively. Worst-case rotations were 0.41, 0.13 and 6.0 degrees. This study showed that quantification of the methodological error enables composition of accurate and precise DRUJ motion scanning protocols. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9950078/ /pubmed/36823242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29726-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Oonk, J. G. M. Dobbe, J. G. G. Strackee, S. D. Strijkers, G. J. Streekstra, G. J. Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT |
title | Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT |
title_full | Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT |
title_fullStr | Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT |
title_short | Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT |
title_sort | quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the druj using dynamic ct |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36823242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29726-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oonkjgm quantificationofthemethodologicalerrorinkinematicevaluationofthedrujusingdynamicct AT dobbejgg quantificationofthemethodologicalerrorinkinematicevaluationofthedrujusingdynamicct AT strackeesd quantificationofthemethodologicalerrorinkinematicevaluationofthedrujusingdynamicct AT strijkersgj quantificationofthemethodologicalerrorinkinematicevaluationofthedrujusingdynamicct AT streekstragj quantificationofthemethodologicalerrorinkinematicevaluationofthedrujusingdynamicct |