Cargando…

Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT

Distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) motion analysis using dynamic CT is gaining popularity. Following scanning and segmentation, 3D bone models are registered to (4D-)CT target frames. Imaging errors like low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), limited Z-coverage and motion artefacts influence registration, ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oonk, J. G. M., Dobbe, J. G. G., Strackee, S. D., Strijkers, G. J., Streekstra, G. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36823242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29726-2
_version_ 1784893083814461440
author Oonk, J. G. M.
Dobbe, J. G. G.
Strackee, S. D.
Strijkers, G. J.
Streekstra, G. J.
author_facet Oonk, J. G. M.
Dobbe, J. G. G.
Strackee, S. D.
Strijkers, G. J.
Streekstra, G. J.
author_sort Oonk, J. G. M.
collection PubMed
description Distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) motion analysis using dynamic CT is gaining popularity. Following scanning and segmentation, 3D bone models are registered to (4D-)CT target frames. Imaging errors like low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), limited Z-coverage and motion artefacts influence registration, causing misinterpretation of joint motion. This necessitates quantification of the methodological error. A cadaver arm and dynamic phantom were subjected to multiple 4D-CT scans, while varying tube charge-time product and phantom angular velocity, to evaluate the effects of SNR and motion artefacts on registration accuracy and precision. 4D-CT Z-coverage is limited by the scanner. To quantify the effects of different Z-coverages on registration accuracy and precision, 4D-CT was simulated by acquiring multiple spiral 3D-CT scans of the cadaver arm. Z-coverage was varied by clipping the 3D bone models prior to registration. The radius position relative to the ulna was obtained from the segmentation image. Apparent relative displacement seen in the target images is caused by registration errors. Worst-case translations were 0.45, 0.08 and 1.1 mm for SNR-, Z-coverage- and motion-related errors respectively. Worst-case rotations were 0.41, 0.13 and 6.0 degrees. This study showed that quantification of the methodological error enables composition of accurate and precise DRUJ motion scanning protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9950078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99500782023-02-25 Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT Oonk, J. G. M. Dobbe, J. G. G. Strackee, S. D. Strijkers, G. J. Streekstra, G. J. Sci Rep Article Distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) motion analysis using dynamic CT is gaining popularity. Following scanning and segmentation, 3D bone models are registered to (4D-)CT target frames. Imaging errors like low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), limited Z-coverage and motion artefacts influence registration, causing misinterpretation of joint motion. This necessitates quantification of the methodological error. A cadaver arm and dynamic phantom were subjected to multiple 4D-CT scans, while varying tube charge-time product and phantom angular velocity, to evaluate the effects of SNR and motion artefacts on registration accuracy and precision. 4D-CT Z-coverage is limited by the scanner. To quantify the effects of different Z-coverages on registration accuracy and precision, 4D-CT was simulated by acquiring multiple spiral 3D-CT scans of the cadaver arm. Z-coverage was varied by clipping the 3D bone models prior to registration. The radius position relative to the ulna was obtained from the segmentation image. Apparent relative displacement seen in the target images is caused by registration errors. Worst-case translations were 0.45, 0.08 and 1.1 mm for SNR-, Z-coverage- and motion-related errors respectively. Worst-case rotations were 0.41, 0.13 and 6.0 degrees. This study showed that quantification of the methodological error enables composition of accurate and precise DRUJ motion scanning protocols. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9950078/ /pubmed/36823242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29726-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Oonk, J. G. M.
Dobbe, J. G. G.
Strackee, S. D.
Strijkers, G. J.
Streekstra, G. J.
Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT
title Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT
title_full Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT
title_fullStr Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT
title_short Quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the DRUJ using dynamic CT
title_sort quantification of the methodological error in kinematic evaluation of the druj using dynamic ct
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36823242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29726-2
work_keys_str_mv AT oonkjgm quantificationofthemethodologicalerrorinkinematicevaluationofthedrujusingdynamicct
AT dobbejgg quantificationofthemethodologicalerrorinkinematicevaluationofthedrujusingdynamicct
AT strackeesd quantificationofthemethodologicalerrorinkinematicevaluationofthedrujusingdynamicct
AT strijkersgj quantificationofthemethodologicalerrorinkinematicevaluationofthedrujusingdynamicct
AT streekstragj quantificationofthemethodologicalerrorinkinematicevaluationofthedrujusingdynamicct