Cargando…
Dogs’ ability to follow temporarily invisible moving objects: the ability to track and expect is shaped by experience
Visually tracking a moving object, even if it becomes temporarily invisible, is an important skill for animals living in complex environments. However, this ability has not been widely explored in dogs. To address this gap of knowledge and understand how experience contributes to such ability, we co...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01695-5 |
_version_ | 1784893106813927424 |
---|---|
author | Lõoke, Miina Kanizsar, Orsolya Guérineau, Cécile Mongillo, Paolo Marinelli, Lieta |
author_facet | Lõoke, Miina Kanizsar, Orsolya Guérineau, Cécile Mongillo, Paolo Marinelli, Lieta |
author_sort | Lõoke, Miina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Visually tracking a moving object, even if it becomes temporarily invisible, is an important skill for animals living in complex environments. However, this ability has not been widely explored in dogs. To address this gap of knowledge and understand how experience contributes to such ability, we conducted two experiments using a violation of expectation paradigm. Dogs were shown an animation of a ball moving horizontally across a screen, passing behind an occluder, and reappearing with a timing that was faster, slower or congruent with its initial speed. In the first experiment, dogs (N = 15) were exposed to the incongruent conditions without prior experience; while in the second experiment, dogs (N = 37) were preliminarily exposed to the congruent stimulus. Dogs of the first experiment did not exhibit a surprise effect, as measured by latency to look away from the expected stimulus presentation area, in response to the incongruent conditions, suggesting they had not formed an expectation about the timing of reappearance. However, their latency to orient towards the reappearing ball depended on the condition, suggesting they were able, to some extent, to visually keep track of the stimulus’ trajectory. Dogs of the second experiment were surprised when the ball stayed behind the occluder longer than expected, but showed no difference in latency to orient across conditions. This suggests they had overcome the visual tracking mechanism and had formed expectations about the timing of reappearance. In conclusion, dogs seem to use a low-level mechanism to keep visual track of a temporarily disappearing moving object, but experience is required to make expectation about its trajectory. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10071-022-01695-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9950174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99501742023-02-25 Dogs’ ability to follow temporarily invisible moving objects: the ability to track and expect is shaped by experience Lõoke, Miina Kanizsar, Orsolya Guérineau, Cécile Mongillo, Paolo Marinelli, Lieta Anim Cogn Original Paper Visually tracking a moving object, even if it becomes temporarily invisible, is an important skill for animals living in complex environments. However, this ability has not been widely explored in dogs. To address this gap of knowledge and understand how experience contributes to such ability, we conducted two experiments using a violation of expectation paradigm. Dogs were shown an animation of a ball moving horizontally across a screen, passing behind an occluder, and reappearing with a timing that was faster, slower or congruent with its initial speed. In the first experiment, dogs (N = 15) were exposed to the incongruent conditions without prior experience; while in the second experiment, dogs (N = 37) were preliminarily exposed to the congruent stimulus. Dogs of the first experiment did not exhibit a surprise effect, as measured by latency to look away from the expected stimulus presentation area, in response to the incongruent conditions, suggesting they had not formed an expectation about the timing of reappearance. However, their latency to orient towards the reappearing ball depended on the condition, suggesting they were able, to some extent, to visually keep track of the stimulus’ trajectory. Dogs of the second experiment were surprised when the ball stayed behind the occluder longer than expected, but showed no difference in latency to orient across conditions. This suggests they had overcome the visual tracking mechanism and had formed expectations about the timing of reappearance. In conclusion, dogs seem to use a low-level mechanism to keep visual track of a temporarily disappearing moving object, but experience is required to make expectation about its trajectory. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10071-022-01695-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9950174/ /pubmed/36167877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01695-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Lõoke, Miina Kanizsar, Orsolya Guérineau, Cécile Mongillo, Paolo Marinelli, Lieta Dogs’ ability to follow temporarily invisible moving objects: the ability to track and expect is shaped by experience |
title | Dogs’ ability to follow temporarily invisible moving objects: the ability to track and expect is shaped by experience |
title_full | Dogs’ ability to follow temporarily invisible moving objects: the ability to track and expect is shaped by experience |
title_fullStr | Dogs’ ability to follow temporarily invisible moving objects: the ability to track and expect is shaped by experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Dogs’ ability to follow temporarily invisible moving objects: the ability to track and expect is shaped by experience |
title_short | Dogs’ ability to follow temporarily invisible moving objects: the ability to track and expect is shaped by experience |
title_sort | dogs’ ability to follow temporarily invisible moving objects: the ability to track and expect is shaped by experience |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36167877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01695-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lookemiina dogsabilitytofollowtemporarilyinvisiblemovingobjectstheabilitytotrackandexpectisshapedbyexperience AT kanizsarorsolya dogsabilitytofollowtemporarilyinvisiblemovingobjectstheabilitytotrackandexpectisshapedbyexperience AT guerineaucecile dogsabilitytofollowtemporarilyinvisiblemovingobjectstheabilitytotrackandexpectisshapedbyexperience AT mongillopaolo dogsabilitytofollowtemporarilyinvisiblemovingobjectstheabilitytotrackandexpectisshapedbyexperience AT marinellilieta dogsabilitytofollowtemporarilyinvisiblemovingobjectstheabilitytotrackandexpectisshapedbyexperience |