Cargando…

Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs

The hypofractionated radiotherapy modality was established to reduce treatment durations and enhance therapeutic efficiency, as compared to conventional fractionation treatment. However, this modality is challenging because of rigid dosimetric constraints. This study aimed to assess the impact of mu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fathy, Mohamed M., Hassan, Belal Z., El-Gebaly, Reem H., Mokhtar, Maha H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36576578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-022-01011-2
_version_ 1784893116345483264
author Fathy, Mohamed M.
Hassan, Belal Z.
El-Gebaly, Reem H.
Mokhtar, Maha H.
author_facet Fathy, Mohamed M.
Hassan, Belal Z.
El-Gebaly, Reem H.
Mokhtar, Maha H.
author_sort Fathy, Mohamed M.
collection PubMed
description The hypofractionated radiotherapy modality was established to reduce treatment durations and enhance therapeutic efficiency, as compared to conventional fractionation treatment. However, this modality is challenging because of rigid dosimetric constraints. This study aimed to assess the impact of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) widths (10 mm and 5 mm) on plan quality during the treatment of prostate cancer. Additionally, this study aimed to investigate the impact of the MLC mode of energy on the Agility flattening filter (FF), MLC Agility-free flattening filter (FFF), and MLCi2 for patients receiving hypofractionated radiotherapy. Two radiotherapy techniques; Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy (VMAT), were used in this research. In the present study, computed tomography simulations of ten patients (six plans per patient) with localized prostate adenocarcinoma were analyzed. Various dosimetric parameters were assessed, including monitor units, treatment delivery times, conformity, and homogeneity indices. To evaluate the plan quality, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were estimated for each technique. The results demonstrated that the determined dosimetric parameters of planning target volume (PTV)p (such as D mean, conformity, and homogeneity index) showed greater improvement with MLC Agility FF and MLC Agility FFF than with MLCi2. Additionally, the treatment delivery time was reduced in the MLC Agility FF (by 31%) and MLC Agility FFF (by 10.8%) groups compared to the MLCi2 group. It is concluded that for both the VMAT and IMRT techniques, the smaller width (5 mm) MLCs revealed better planning target volume coverage, improved the dosimetric parameters for PTV, reduced the treatment time, and met the constraints for OARs. It is therefore recommended to use 5 mm MLCs for hypofractionated prostate cancer treatment due to better target coverage and better protection of OARs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9950215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99502152023-02-25 Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs Fathy, Mohamed M. Hassan, Belal Z. El-Gebaly, Reem H. Mokhtar, Maha H. Radiat Environ Biophys Original Article The hypofractionated radiotherapy modality was established to reduce treatment durations and enhance therapeutic efficiency, as compared to conventional fractionation treatment. However, this modality is challenging because of rigid dosimetric constraints. This study aimed to assess the impact of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) widths (10 mm and 5 mm) on plan quality during the treatment of prostate cancer. Additionally, this study aimed to investigate the impact of the MLC mode of energy on the Agility flattening filter (FF), MLC Agility-free flattening filter (FFF), and MLCi2 for patients receiving hypofractionated radiotherapy. Two radiotherapy techniques; Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy (VMAT), were used in this research. In the present study, computed tomography simulations of ten patients (six plans per patient) with localized prostate adenocarcinoma were analyzed. Various dosimetric parameters were assessed, including monitor units, treatment delivery times, conformity, and homogeneity indices. To evaluate the plan quality, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were estimated for each technique. The results demonstrated that the determined dosimetric parameters of planning target volume (PTV)p (such as D mean, conformity, and homogeneity index) showed greater improvement with MLC Agility FF and MLC Agility FFF than with MLCi2. Additionally, the treatment delivery time was reduced in the MLC Agility FF (by 31%) and MLC Agility FFF (by 10.8%) groups compared to the MLCi2 group. It is concluded that for both the VMAT and IMRT techniques, the smaller width (5 mm) MLCs revealed better planning target volume coverage, improved the dosimetric parameters for PTV, reduced the treatment time, and met the constraints for OARs. It is therefore recommended to use 5 mm MLCs for hypofractionated prostate cancer treatment due to better target coverage and better protection of OARs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9950215/ /pubmed/36576578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-022-01011-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Fathy, Mohamed M.
Hassan, Belal Z.
El-Gebaly, Reem H.
Mokhtar, Maha H.
Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs
title Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs
title_full Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs
title_fullStr Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs
title_short Dosimetric evaluation study of IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs
title_sort dosimetric evaluation study of imrt and vmat techniques for prostate cancer based on different multileaf collimator designs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36576578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-022-01011-2
work_keys_str_mv AT fathymohamedm dosimetricevaluationstudyofimrtandvmattechniquesforprostatecancerbasedondifferentmultileafcollimatordesigns
AT hassanbelalz dosimetricevaluationstudyofimrtandvmattechniquesforprostatecancerbasedondifferentmultileafcollimatordesigns
AT elgebalyreemh dosimetricevaluationstudyofimrtandvmattechniquesforprostatecancerbasedondifferentmultileafcollimatordesigns
AT mokhtarmahah dosimetricevaluationstudyofimrtandvmattechniquesforprostatecancerbasedondifferentmultileafcollimatordesigns