Cargando…
Understanding treatment burden in hemophilia: development and validation of the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM)
BACKGROUND: To capture the broad range of treatment burden issues experienced by adolescent and adult people with hemophilia (PWH), the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM) was developed. We describe the development of this new hemophilia-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36821002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00550-6 |
_version_ | 1784893135265988608 |
---|---|
author | Brod, Meryl Bushnell, Donald M. Neergaard, Jesper Skov Waldman, Laura Tesler Busk, Anne Kirstine |
author_facet | Brod, Meryl Bushnell, Donald M. Neergaard, Jesper Skov Waldman, Laura Tesler Busk, Anne Kirstine |
author_sort | Brod, Meryl |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To capture the broad range of treatment burden issues experienced by adolescent and adult people with hemophilia (PWH), the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM) was developed. We describe the development of this new hemophilia-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure including concept elicitation, cognitive debriefing, and psychometric validation. RESULTS: Concept elicitation interviews were conducted with 5 clinical experts and 30 adult PWH in the United States (US). The qualitative analysis of these interviews and a review of the literature informed the PRO measure development. The project team reviewed concept endorsement rates and generated a 27-item preliminary version of the Hemo-TEM. Cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted to ensure participant understanding and item relevance in samples of (adolescent (n = 20) and adult (n = 14)) PWH in the US. The refined, validation-ready version of the Hemo-TEM included 30 items. Lastly, data from 3 clinical trials comprised the 4 analysis sets used for the psychometric validation with a sample size of N = 88. Item reduction dropped 4 items resulting in a final 26-item measure. Factor analysis generated 5 domains in the Hemo-TEM [injection difficulties (3 items), physical impact (6 items), treatment bother (7 items), interference with daily life (4 items), and emotional impact (6 items)] and a total score. All scores were reliable [internally consistent (0.84–0.88)]. For convergent validity, with the exception of one domain, all hypothesized associations were met. Preliminary sensitivity to change effect sizes were between − 0.30 and − 0.70. Meaningful change thresholds ranged from 6 points (physical impact and emotional impact) to 10 points (treatment bother) with 8 points for the Hemo-TEM total score. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the concept elicitation, cognitive debriefing, and psychometric validation phases provide evidence that the Hemo-TEM is a well-designed, valid, and reliable measure of the burden of hemophilia treatment, including treatment impact on adolescent and adult PWH. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-023-00550-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9950311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99503112023-02-25 Understanding treatment burden in hemophilia: development and validation of the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM) Brod, Meryl Bushnell, Donald M. Neergaard, Jesper Skov Waldman, Laura Tesler Busk, Anne Kirstine J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: To capture the broad range of treatment burden issues experienced by adolescent and adult people with hemophilia (PWH), the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM) was developed. We describe the development of this new hemophilia-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure including concept elicitation, cognitive debriefing, and psychometric validation. RESULTS: Concept elicitation interviews were conducted with 5 clinical experts and 30 adult PWH in the United States (US). The qualitative analysis of these interviews and a review of the literature informed the PRO measure development. The project team reviewed concept endorsement rates and generated a 27-item preliminary version of the Hemo-TEM. Cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted to ensure participant understanding and item relevance in samples of (adolescent (n = 20) and adult (n = 14)) PWH in the US. The refined, validation-ready version of the Hemo-TEM included 30 items. Lastly, data from 3 clinical trials comprised the 4 analysis sets used for the psychometric validation with a sample size of N = 88. Item reduction dropped 4 items resulting in a final 26-item measure. Factor analysis generated 5 domains in the Hemo-TEM [injection difficulties (3 items), physical impact (6 items), treatment bother (7 items), interference with daily life (4 items), and emotional impact (6 items)] and a total score. All scores were reliable [internally consistent (0.84–0.88)]. For convergent validity, with the exception of one domain, all hypothesized associations were met. Preliminary sensitivity to change effect sizes were between − 0.30 and − 0.70. Meaningful change thresholds ranged from 6 points (physical impact and emotional impact) to 10 points (treatment bother) with 8 points for the Hemo-TEM total score. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the concept elicitation, cognitive debriefing, and psychometric validation phases provide evidence that the Hemo-TEM is a well-designed, valid, and reliable measure of the burden of hemophilia treatment, including treatment impact on adolescent and adult PWH. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-023-00550-6. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9950311/ /pubmed/36821002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00550-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Brod, Meryl Bushnell, Donald M. Neergaard, Jesper Skov Waldman, Laura Tesler Busk, Anne Kirstine Understanding treatment burden in hemophilia: development and validation of the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM) |
title | Understanding treatment burden in hemophilia: development and validation of the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM) |
title_full | Understanding treatment burden in hemophilia: development and validation of the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM) |
title_fullStr | Understanding treatment burden in hemophilia: development and validation of the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM) |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding treatment burden in hemophilia: development and validation of the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM) |
title_short | Understanding treatment burden in hemophilia: development and validation of the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM) |
title_sort | understanding treatment burden in hemophilia: development and validation of the hemophilia treatment experience measure (hemo-tem) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36821002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00550-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brodmeryl understandingtreatmentburdeninhemophiliadevelopmentandvalidationofthehemophiliatreatmentexperiencemeasurehemotem AT bushnelldonaldm understandingtreatmentburdeninhemophiliadevelopmentandvalidationofthehemophiliatreatmentexperiencemeasurehemotem AT neergaardjesperskov understandingtreatmentburdeninhemophiliadevelopmentandvalidationofthehemophiliatreatmentexperiencemeasurehemotem AT waldmanlauratesler understandingtreatmentburdeninhemophiliadevelopmentandvalidationofthehemophiliatreatmentexperiencemeasurehemotem AT buskannekirstine understandingtreatmentburdeninhemophiliadevelopmentandvalidationofthehemophiliatreatmentexperiencemeasurehemotem |