Cargando…

Validation of Oura ring energy expenditure and steps in laboratory and free-living

BACKGROUND: Commercial activity trackers are increasingly used in research and compared with research-based accelerometers are often less intrusive, cheaper, with improved storage and battery capacity, although typically less validated. The present study aimed to determine the validity of Oura Ring...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kristiansson, Emilia, Fridolfsson, Jonatan, Arvidsson, Daniel, Holmäng, Agneta, Börjesson, Mats, Andersson-Hall, Ulrika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36829120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01868-x
_version_ 1784893225063940096
author Kristiansson, Emilia
Fridolfsson, Jonatan
Arvidsson, Daniel
Holmäng, Agneta
Börjesson, Mats
Andersson-Hall, Ulrika
author_facet Kristiansson, Emilia
Fridolfsson, Jonatan
Arvidsson, Daniel
Holmäng, Agneta
Börjesson, Mats
Andersson-Hall, Ulrika
author_sort Kristiansson, Emilia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Commercial activity trackers are increasingly used in research and compared with research-based accelerometers are often less intrusive, cheaper, with improved storage and battery capacity, although typically less validated. The present study aimed to determine the validity of Oura Ring step-count and energy expenditure (EE) in both laboratory and free-living. METHODS: Oura Ring EE was compared against indirect calorimetry in the laboratory, followed by a 14-day free-living study with 32 participants wearing an Oura Ring and reference monitors (three accelerometers positioned at hip, thigh, and wrist, and pedometer) to evaluate Oura EE variables and step count. RESULTS: Strong correlations were shown for Oura versus indirect calorimetry in the laboratory (r = 0.93), and versus reference monitors for all variables in free-living (r ≥ 0.76). Significant (p < 0.05) mean differences for Oura versus reference methods were found for laboratory measured sitting (− 0.12 ± 0.28 MET), standing (− 0.27 ± 0.33 MET), fast walk (− 0.82 ± 1.92 MET) and very fast run (− 3.49 ± 3.94 MET), and for free-living step-count (2124 ± 4256 steps) and EE variables (MET: − 0.34-0.26; TEE: 362–494 kcal; AEE: − 487-259 kcal). In the laboratory, Oura tended to underestimate EE with increasing discrepancy as intensity increased. CONCLUSION: This is the first study investigating the validity of Oura Ring EE against gold standard methods. Oura successfully identified major changes between activities and/or intensities but was less responsive to detailed deviations within activities. In free-living, Oura step-count and EE variables tightly correlated with reference monitors, though with systemic over- or underestimations indicating somewhat low intra-individual validity of the ring versus the reference monitors. However, the correlations between the devices were high, suggesting that the Oura can detect differences at group-level for active and total energy expenditure, as well as step count.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9950693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99506932023-02-24 Validation of Oura ring energy expenditure and steps in laboratory and free-living Kristiansson, Emilia Fridolfsson, Jonatan Arvidsson, Daniel Holmäng, Agneta Börjesson, Mats Andersson-Hall, Ulrika BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: Commercial activity trackers are increasingly used in research and compared with research-based accelerometers are often less intrusive, cheaper, with improved storage and battery capacity, although typically less validated. The present study aimed to determine the validity of Oura Ring step-count and energy expenditure (EE) in both laboratory and free-living. METHODS: Oura Ring EE was compared against indirect calorimetry in the laboratory, followed by a 14-day free-living study with 32 participants wearing an Oura Ring and reference monitors (three accelerometers positioned at hip, thigh, and wrist, and pedometer) to evaluate Oura EE variables and step count. RESULTS: Strong correlations were shown for Oura versus indirect calorimetry in the laboratory (r = 0.93), and versus reference monitors for all variables in free-living (r ≥ 0.76). Significant (p < 0.05) mean differences for Oura versus reference methods were found for laboratory measured sitting (− 0.12 ± 0.28 MET), standing (− 0.27 ± 0.33 MET), fast walk (− 0.82 ± 1.92 MET) and very fast run (− 3.49 ± 3.94 MET), and for free-living step-count (2124 ± 4256 steps) and EE variables (MET: − 0.34-0.26; TEE: 362–494 kcal; AEE: − 487-259 kcal). In the laboratory, Oura tended to underestimate EE with increasing discrepancy as intensity increased. CONCLUSION: This is the first study investigating the validity of Oura Ring EE against gold standard methods. Oura successfully identified major changes between activities and/or intensities but was less responsive to detailed deviations within activities. In free-living, Oura step-count and EE variables tightly correlated with reference monitors, though with systemic over- or underestimations indicating somewhat low intra-individual validity of the ring versus the reference monitors. However, the correlations between the devices were high, suggesting that the Oura can detect differences at group-level for active and total energy expenditure, as well as step count. BioMed Central 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9950693/ /pubmed/36829120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01868-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kristiansson, Emilia
Fridolfsson, Jonatan
Arvidsson, Daniel
Holmäng, Agneta
Börjesson, Mats
Andersson-Hall, Ulrika
Validation of Oura ring energy expenditure and steps in laboratory and free-living
title Validation of Oura ring energy expenditure and steps in laboratory and free-living
title_full Validation of Oura ring energy expenditure and steps in laboratory and free-living
title_fullStr Validation of Oura ring energy expenditure and steps in laboratory and free-living
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Oura ring energy expenditure and steps in laboratory and free-living
title_short Validation of Oura ring energy expenditure and steps in laboratory and free-living
title_sort validation of oura ring energy expenditure and steps in laboratory and free-living
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36829120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01868-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kristianssonemilia validationofouraringenergyexpenditureandstepsinlaboratoryandfreeliving
AT fridolfssonjonatan validationofouraringenergyexpenditureandstepsinlaboratoryandfreeliving
AT arvidssondaniel validationofouraringenergyexpenditureandstepsinlaboratoryandfreeliving
AT holmangagneta validationofouraringenergyexpenditureandstepsinlaboratoryandfreeliving
AT borjessonmats validationofouraringenergyexpenditureandstepsinlaboratoryandfreeliving
AT anderssonhallulrika validationofouraringenergyexpenditureandstepsinlaboratoryandfreeliving