Cargando…

Vascular impulse technology versus elevation for the reduction of swelling of lower extremity joint fractures: results of a prospective randomized controlled study

AIMS: Complex joint fractures of the lower extremity are often accompanied by soft-tissue swelling and are associated with prolonged hospitalization and soft-tissue complications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of vascular impulse technology (VIT) on soft-tissue conditioning in comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnetzke, Marc, El Barbari, Jan, Schüler, Svenja, Swartman, Benedict, Keil, Holger, Vetter, Sven, Gruetzner, Paul Alfred, Franke, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1260.R1
_version_ 1784893258882613248
author Schnetzke, Marc
El Barbari, Jan
Schüler, Svenja
Swartman, Benedict
Keil, Holger
Vetter, Sven
Gruetzner, Paul Alfred
Franke, Jochen
author_facet Schnetzke, Marc
El Barbari, Jan
Schüler, Svenja
Swartman, Benedict
Keil, Holger
Vetter, Sven
Gruetzner, Paul Alfred
Franke, Jochen
author_sort Schnetzke, Marc
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Complex joint fractures of the lower extremity are often accompanied by soft-tissue swelling and are associated with prolonged hospitalization and soft-tissue complications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of vascular impulse technology (VIT) on soft-tissue conditioning in comparison with conventional elevation. METHODS: A total of 100 patients were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled monocentre study allocated to the three subgroups of dislocated ankle fracture (n = 40), pilon fracture (n = 20), and intra-articular calcaneal fracture (n = 40). Patients were randomized to the two study groups in a 1:1 ratio. The effectiveness of VIT (intervention) compared with elevation (control) was analyzed separately for the whole study population and for the three subgroups. The primary endpoint was the time from admission until operability (in days). RESULTS: The mean length of time until operability was 8.2 days (SD 3.0) in the intervention group and 10.2 days (SD 3.7) in the control group across all three fractures groups combined (p = 0.004). An analysis of the subgroups revealed that a significant reduction in the time to operability was achieved in two of the three: with 8.6 days (SD 2.2) versus 10.6 days (SD 3.6) in ankle fractures (p = 0.043), 9.8 days (SD 4.1) versus 12.5 days (SD 5.1) in pilon fractures (p = 0.205), and 7.0 days (SD 2.6) versus 8.4 days (SD 1.5) in calcaneal fractures (p = 0.043). A lower length of stay (p = 0.007), a reduction in pain (p(preop) = 0.05; p(discharge) < 0.001) and need for narcotics (p(preop) = 0.064; p(postop) = 0.072), an increased reduction in swelling (p < 0.001), and a lower revision rate (p = 0.044) could also be seen, and a trend towards fewer complications (p = 0.216) became apparent. CONCLUSION: Compared with elevation, VIT results in a significant reduction in the time to achieve operability in complex joint fractures of the lower limb. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):746–754.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9950846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99508462023-02-25 Vascular impulse technology versus elevation for the reduction of swelling of lower extremity joint fractures: results of a prospective randomized controlled study Schnetzke, Marc El Barbari, Jan Schüler, Svenja Swartman, Benedict Keil, Holger Vetter, Sven Gruetzner, Paul Alfred Franke, Jochen Bone Joint J Trauma AIMS: Complex joint fractures of the lower extremity are often accompanied by soft-tissue swelling and are associated with prolonged hospitalization and soft-tissue complications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of vascular impulse technology (VIT) on soft-tissue conditioning in comparison with conventional elevation. METHODS: A total of 100 patients were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled monocentre study allocated to the three subgroups of dislocated ankle fracture (n = 40), pilon fracture (n = 20), and intra-articular calcaneal fracture (n = 40). Patients were randomized to the two study groups in a 1:1 ratio. The effectiveness of VIT (intervention) compared with elevation (control) was analyzed separately for the whole study population and for the three subgroups. The primary endpoint was the time from admission until operability (in days). RESULTS: The mean length of time until operability was 8.2 days (SD 3.0) in the intervention group and 10.2 days (SD 3.7) in the control group across all three fractures groups combined (p = 0.004). An analysis of the subgroups revealed that a significant reduction in the time to operability was achieved in two of the three: with 8.6 days (SD 2.2) versus 10.6 days (SD 3.6) in ankle fractures (p = 0.043), 9.8 days (SD 4.1) versus 12.5 days (SD 5.1) in pilon fractures (p = 0.205), and 7.0 days (SD 2.6) versus 8.4 days (SD 1.5) in calcaneal fractures (p = 0.043). A lower length of stay (p = 0.007), a reduction in pain (p(preop) = 0.05; p(discharge) < 0.001) and need for narcotics (p(preop) = 0.064; p(postop) = 0.072), an increased reduction in swelling (p < 0.001), and a lower revision rate (p = 0.044) could also be seen, and a trend towards fewer complications (p = 0.216) became apparent. CONCLUSION: Compared with elevation, VIT results in a significant reduction in the time to achieve operability in complex joint fractures of the lower limb. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):746–754. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9950846/ /pubmed/33789481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1260.R1 Text en © 2021 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Trauma
Schnetzke, Marc
El Barbari, Jan
Schüler, Svenja
Swartman, Benedict
Keil, Holger
Vetter, Sven
Gruetzner, Paul Alfred
Franke, Jochen
Vascular impulse technology versus elevation for the reduction of swelling of lower extremity joint fractures: results of a prospective randomized controlled study
title Vascular impulse technology versus elevation for the reduction of swelling of lower extremity joint fractures: results of a prospective randomized controlled study
title_full Vascular impulse technology versus elevation for the reduction of swelling of lower extremity joint fractures: results of a prospective randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Vascular impulse technology versus elevation for the reduction of swelling of lower extremity joint fractures: results of a prospective randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Vascular impulse technology versus elevation for the reduction of swelling of lower extremity joint fractures: results of a prospective randomized controlled study
title_short Vascular impulse technology versus elevation for the reduction of swelling of lower extremity joint fractures: results of a prospective randomized controlled study
title_sort vascular impulse technology versus elevation for the reduction of swelling of lower extremity joint fractures: results of a prospective randomized controlled study
topic Trauma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9950846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33789481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1260.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT schnetzkemarc vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationforthereductionofswellingoflowerextremityjointfracturesresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT elbarbarijan vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationforthereductionofswellingoflowerextremityjointfracturesresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT schulersvenja vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationforthereductionofswellingoflowerextremityjointfracturesresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT swartmanbenedict vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationforthereductionofswellingoflowerextremityjointfracturesresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT keilholger vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationforthereductionofswellingoflowerextremityjointfracturesresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT vettersven vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationforthereductionofswellingoflowerextremityjointfracturesresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT gruetznerpaulalfred vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationforthereductionofswellingoflowerextremityjointfracturesresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT frankejochen vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationforthereductionofswellingoflowerextremityjointfracturesresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy