Cargando…

Impact on touch DNA of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer used in COVID-19 prevention

In the last years, forensic research has been focused on touch DNA in order to improve its evidential value in criminal activity investigations as well as to understand the variables impacting touch DNA. One of the emerging variables is represented by the use of alcohol-based sanitizers, which was s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bini, Carla, Giorgetti, Arianna, Fazio, Giulia, Amurri, Sara, Pelletti, Guido, Pelotti, Susi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9951825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-02979-2
_version_ 1784893475564552192
author Bini, Carla
Giorgetti, Arianna
Fazio, Giulia
Amurri, Sara
Pelletti, Guido
Pelotti, Susi
author_facet Bini, Carla
Giorgetti, Arianna
Fazio, Giulia
Amurri, Sara
Pelletti, Guido
Pelotti, Susi
author_sort Bini, Carla
collection PubMed
description In the last years, forensic research has been focused on touch DNA in order to improve its evidential value in criminal activity investigations as well as to understand the variables impacting touch DNA. One of the emerging variables is represented by the use of alcohol-based sanitizers, which was suggested for hand hygiene during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aims of the present study were to assess the effect of a hand sanitizer on touch DNA deposition, transfer, and recovery and also to evaluate STR typing success, quality of DNA profiles, and personal identification. Before and after the use of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer, 20 volunteers deposited on glass surfaces 120 fingerprints, containing skin-derived or salivary DNA. Samples were quantified by real-time quantitative PCR (q-PCR), and 76 samples yielding > 15 pg/μl were typed for 21 autosomal STRs by GlobalFiler® PCR Amplification Kit. DNA profiles were classified into single source, mixed, and inconclusive profiles, and a LR assessment was performed by comparison to the reference samples using LRmix Studio software. After the use of hand sanitizer, samples yielded lower quantities of recovered transferred DNA, especially considering samples containing salivary DNA (p < 0.05 by Friedman test). All the 76 amplified samples (63.3% of the total) showed at least 10 typed loci, and 83–100% of profiles were consistent with the reference ones on the basis of a LR value ≥ 10(6). Results showed that, although the hand sanitizer reduces the DNA recovering, touch DNA samples might still be useful for forensic personal identification even when hand sanitizers are used. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00414-023-02979-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9951825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99518252023-02-24 Impact on touch DNA of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer used in COVID-19 prevention Bini, Carla Giorgetti, Arianna Fazio, Giulia Amurri, Sara Pelletti, Guido Pelotti, Susi Int J Legal Med Original Article In the last years, forensic research has been focused on touch DNA in order to improve its evidential value in criminal activity investigations as well as to understand the variables impacting touch DNA. One of the emerging variables is represented by the use of alcohol-based sanitizers, which was suggested for hand hygiene during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aims of the present study were to assess the effect of a hand sanitizer on touch DNA deposition, transfer, and recovery and also to evaluate STR typing success, quality of DNA profiles, and personal identification. Before and after the use of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer, 20 volunteers deposited on glass surfaces 120 fingerprints, containing skin-derived or salivary DNA. Samples were quantified by real-time quantitative PCR (q-PCR), and 76 samples yielding > 15 pg/μl were typed for 21 autosomal STRs by GlobalFiler® PCR Amplification Kit. DNA profiles were classified into single source, mixed, and inconclusive profiles, and a LR assessment was performed by comparison to the reference samples using LRmix Studio software. After the use of hand sanitizer, samples yielded lower quantities of recovered transferred DNA, especially considering samples containing salivary DNA (p < 0.05 by Friedman test). All the 76 amplified samples (63.3% of the total) showed at least 10 typed loci, and 83–100% of profiles were consistent with the reference ones on the basis of a LR value ≥ 10(6). Results showed that, although the hand sanitizer reduces the DNA recovering, touch DNA samples might still be useful for forensic personal identification even when hand sanitizers are used. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00414-023-02979-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9951825/ /pubmed/36826525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-02979-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Bini, Carla
Giorgetti, Arianna
Fazio, Giulia
Amurri, Sara
Pelletti, Guido
Pelotti, Susi
Impact on touch DNA of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer used in COVID-19 prevention
title Impact on touch DNA of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer used in COVID-19 prevention
title_full Impact on touch DNA of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer used in COVID-19 prevention
title_fullStr Impact on touch DNA of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer used in COVID-19 prevention
title_full_unstemmed Impact on touch DNA of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer used in COVID-19 prevention
title_short Impact on touch DNA of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer used in COVID-19 prevention
title_sort impact on touch dna of an alcohol-based hand sanitizer used in covid-19 prevention
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9951825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-02979-2
work_keys_str_mv AT binicarla impactontouchdnaofanalcoholbasedhandsanitizerusedincovid19prevention
AT giorgettiarianna impactontouchdnaofanalcoholbasedhandsanitizerusedincovid19prevention
AT faziogiulia impactontouchdnaofanalcoholbasedhandsanitizerusedincovid19prevention
AT amurrisara impactontouchdnaofanalcoholbasedhandsanitizerusedincovid19prevention
AT pellettiguido impactontouchdnaofanalcoholbasedhandsanitizerusedincovid19prevention
AT pelottisusi impactontouchdnaofanalcoholbasedhandsanitizerusedincovid19prevention