Cargando…

Ocular Ultrasonography in Healthy Calves with Different Transducers

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Ocular ultrasonography for eye examination is seldom performed in cattle. Despite this, some ocular pathologies have detrimental effects on animal welfare. Thus, the knowledge of normal ultrasonographic eye patterns and biometry is helpful for correct diagnosis. In this study, we com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borriello, Giuliano, Valentini, Flaminia, Rampinelli, Mauro, Ferrini, Sara, Cagnotti, Giulia, D’angelo, Antonio, Bellino, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9952285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36830528
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13040742
_version_ 1784893592921178112
author Borriello, Giuliano
Valentini, Flaminia
Rampinelli, Mauro
Ferrini, Sara
Cagnotti, Giulia
D’angelo, Antonio
Bellino, Claudio
author_facet Borriello, Giuliano
Valentini, Flaminia
Rampinelli, Mauro
Ferrini, Sara
Cagnotti, Giulia
D’angelo, Antonio
Bellino, Claudio
author_sort Borriello, Giuliano
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Ocular ultrasonography for eye examination is seldom performed in cattle. Despite this, some ocular pathologies have detrimental effects on animal welfare. Thus, the knowledge of normal ultrasonographic eye patterns and biometry is helpful for correct diagnosis. In this study, we compared the measurements made with three ultrasound transducers (linear, convex, transrectal gynecological) in field conditions on 20 healthy calves (10 Holstein breed, 10 Piedmontese breed). While both linear and transrectal gynecological transducers can be used for eye examination in the field, widespread application of the transrectal gynecological probe make it the most suitable choice for ocular ultrasonography in field conditions. ABSTRACT: Ocular ultrasonography is seldom performed in cattle. Here, we compared three ultrasound probes (linear, convex, transrectal gynecological) for the measurement of eight eye biometry parameters on vertical and horizontal scans. The sample population was 20 healthy calves (n = 10 Holstein, n = 10 Piedmontese breed). Intragroup (same probe for vertical vs. horizontal scanning) and intergroup (different probes measuring the same biometric parameter) comparisons were performed using Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Intragroup comparison revealed few significant differences. Ultrasound examination with the convex transducer detected more differences than either of the two other probes on vertical (linear six out of eight; transrectal gynecological four out of eight) and horizontal (linear six out of eight; transrectal gynecological six out of eight) scans. Similar results were obtained for both breeds. More non-valuable parameters on the horizontal (77 out of 320, 24%) and the vertical (85 out of 320, 26%) (p ≤ 0.001) scans were obtained with the convex transducer. Both linear transducers were found comparable for ocular ultrasonography in field conditions. However, given its widespread application in the field, the transrectal gynecological transducer may offer veterinarians the added advantage of familiarity and ease-of-use without any additional costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9952285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99522852023-02-25 Ocular Ultrasonography in Healthy Calves with Different Transducers Borriello, Giuliano Valentini, Flaminia Rampinelli, Mauro Ferrini, Sara Cagnotti, Giulia D’angelo, Antonio Bellino, Claudio Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Ocular ultrasonography for eye examination is seldom performed in cattle. Despite this, some ocular pathologies have detrimental effects on animal welfare. Thus, the knowledge of normal ultrasonographic eye patterns and biometry is helpful for correct diagnosis. In this study, we compared the measurements made with three ultrasound transducers (linear, convex, transrectal gynecological) in field conditions on 20 healthy calves (10 Holstein breed, 10 Piedmontese breed). While both linear and transrectal gynecological transducers can be used for eye examination in the field, widespread application of the transrectal gynecological probe make it the most suitable choice for ocular ultrasonography in field conditions. ABSTRACT: Ocular ultrasonography is seldom performed in cattle. Here, we compared three ultrasound probes (linear, convex, transrectal gynecological) for the measurement of eight eye biometry parameters on vertical and horizontal scans. The sample population was 20 healthy calves (n = 10 Holstein, n = 10 Piedmontese breed). Intragroup (same probe for vertical vs. horizontal scanning) and intergroup (different probes measuring the same biometric parameter) comparisons were performed using Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Intragroup comparison revealed few significant differences. Ultrasound examination with the convex transducer detected more differences than either of the two other probes on vertical (linear six out of eight; transrectal gynecological four out of eight) and horizontal (linear six out of eight; transrectal gynecological six out of eight) scans. Similar results were obtained for both breeds. More non-valuable parameters on the horizontal (77 out of 320, 24%) and the vertical (85 out of 320, 26%) (p ≤ 0.001) scans were obtained with the convex transducer. Both linear transducers were found comparable for ocular ultrasonography in field conditions. However, given its widespread application in the field, the transrectal gynecological transducer may offer veterinarians the added advantage of familiarity and ease-of-use without any additional costs. MDPI 2023-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9952285/ /pubmed/36830528 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13040742 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Borriello, Giuliano
Valentini, Flaminia
Rampinelli, Mauro
Ferrini, Sara
Cagnotti, Giulia
D’angelo, Antonio
Bellino, Claudio
Ocular Ultrasonography in Healthy Calves with Different Transducers
title Ocular Ultrasonography in Healthy Calves with Different Transducers
title_full Ocular Ultrasonography in Healthy Calves with Different Transducers
title_fullStr Ocular Ultrasonography in Healthy Calves with Different Transducers
title_full_unstemmed Ocular Ultrasonography in Healthy Calves with Different Transducers
title_short Ocular Ultrasonography in Healthy Calves with Different Transducers
title_sort ocular ultrasonography in healthy calves with different transducers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9952285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36830528
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13040742
work_keys_str_mv AT borriellogiuliano ocularultrasonographyinhealthycalveswithdifferenttransducers
AT valentiniflaminia ocularultrasonographyinhealthycalveswithdifferenttransducers
AT rampinellimauro ocularultrasonographyinhealthycalveswithdifferenttransducers
AT ferrinisara ocularultrasonographyinhealthycalveswithdifferenttransducers
AT cagnottigiulia ocularultrasonographyinhealthycalveswithdifferenttransducers
AT dangeloantonio ocularultrasonographyinhealthycalveswithdifferenttransducers
AT bellinoclaudio ocularultrasonographyinhealthycalveswithdifferenttransducers