Cargando…
Risk Assessment and Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence
SIMPLE SUMMARY: The only curative treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is surgical resection, and an early diagnosis is the most effective way to improve survival. In this context, Artificial Intelligence models may be able to evaluate higher-risk patients and thus improve diagnosis....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9952965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36829492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology12020213 |
_version_ | 1784893760364085248 |
---|---|
author | Granata, Vincenza Fusco, Roberta De Muzio, Federica Cutolo, Carmen Grassi, Francesca Brunese, Maria Chiara Simonetti, Igino Catalano, Orlando Gabelloni, Michela Pradella, Silvia Danti, Ginevra Flammia, Federica Borgheresi, Alessandra Agostini, Andrea Bruno, Federico Palumbo, Pierpaolo Ottaiano, Alessandro Izzo, Francesco Giovagnoni, Andrea Barile, Antonio Gandolfo, Nicoletta Miele, Vittorio |
author_facet | Granata, Vincenza Fusco, Roberta De Muzio, Federica Cutolo, Carmen Grassi, Francesca Brunese, Maria Chiara Simonetti, Igino Catalano, Orlando Gabelloni, Michela Pradella, Silvia Danti, Ginevra Flammia, Federica Borgheresi, Alessandra Agostini, Andrea Bruno, Federico Palumbo, Pierpaolo Ottaiano, Alessandro Izzo, Francesco Giovagnoni, Andrea Barile, Antonio Gandolfo, Nicoletta Miele, Vittorio |
author_sort | Granata, Vincenza |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: The only curative treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is surgical resection, and an early diagnosis is the most effective way to improve survival. In this context, Artificial Intelligence models may be able to evaluate higher-risk patients and thus improve diagnosis. ABSTRACT: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver tumor, with a median survival of only 13 months. Surgical resection remains the only curative therapy; however, at first detection, only one-third of patients are at an early enough stage for this approach to be effective, thus rendering early diagnosis as an efficient approach to improving survival. Therefore, the identification of higher-risk patients, whose risk is correlated with genetic and pre-cancerous conditions, and the employment of non-invasive-screening modalities would be appropriate. For several at-risk patients, such as those suffering from primary sclerosing cholangitis or fibropolycystic liver disease, the use of periodic (6–12 months) imaging of the liver by ultrasound (US), magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)/cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), or computed tomography (CT) in association with serum CA19-9 measurement has been proposed. For liver cirrhosis patients, it has been proposed that at-risk iCCA patients are monitored in a similar fashion to at-risk HCC patients. The possibility of using Artificial Intelligence models to evaluate higher-risk patients could favor the diagnosis of these entities, although more data are needed to support the practical utility of these applications in the field of screening. For these reasons, it would be appropriate to develop screening programs in the research protocols setting. In fact, the success of these programs reauires patient compliance and multidisciplinary cooperation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9952965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99529652023-02-25 Risk Assessment and Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence Granata, Vincenza Fusco, Roberta De Muzio, Federica Cutolo, Carmen Grassi, Francesca Brunese, Maria Chiara Simonetti, Igino Catalano, Orlando Gabelloni, Michela Pradella, Silvia Danti, Ginevra Flammia, Federica Borgheresi, Alessandra Agostini, Andrea Bruno, Federico Palumbo, Pierpaolo Ottaiano, Alessandro Izzo, Francesco Giovagnoni, Andrea Barile, Antonio Gandolfo, Nicoletta Miele, Vittorio Biology (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: The only curative treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is surgical resection, and an early diagnosis is the most effective way to improve survival. In this context, Artificial Intelligence models may be able to evaluate higher-risk patients and thus improve diagnosis. ABSTRACT: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver tumor, with a median survival of only 13 months. Surgical resection remains the only curative therapy; however, at first detection, only one-third of patients are at an early enough stage for this approach to be effective, thus rendering early diagnosis as an efficient approach to improving survival. Therefore, the identification of higher-risk patients, whose risk is correlated with genetic and pre-cancerous conditions, and the employment of non-invasive-screening modalities would be appropriate. For several at-risk patients, such as those suffering from primary sclerosing cholangitis or fibropolycystic liver disease, the use of periodic (6–12 months) imaging of the liver by ultrasound (US), magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)/cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), or computed tomography (CT) in association with serum CA19-9 measurement has been proposed. For liver cirrhosis patients, it has been proposed that at-risk iCCA patients are monitored in a similar fashion to at-risk HCC patients. The possibility of using Artificial Intelligence models to evaluate higher-risk patients could favor the diagnosis of these entities, although more data are needed to support the practical utility of these applications in the field of screening. For these reasons, it would be appropriate to develop screening programs in the research protocols setting. In fact, the success of these programs reauires patient compliance and multidisciplinary cooperation. MDPI 2023-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9952965/ /pubmed/36829492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology12020213 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Granata, Vincenza Fusco, Roberta De Muzio, Federica Cutolo, Carmen Grassi, Francesca Brunese, Maria Chiara Simonetti, Igino Catalano, Orlando Gabelloni, Michela Pradella, Silvia Danti, Ginevra Flammia, Federica Borgheresi, Alessandra Agostini, Andrea Bruno, Federico Palumbo, Pierpaolo Ottaiano, Alessandro Izzo, Francesco Giovagnoni, Andrea Barile, Antonio Gandolfo, Nicoletta Miele, Vittorio Risk Assessment and Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence |
title | Risk Assessment and Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence |
title_full | Risk Assessment and Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence |
title_fullStr | Risk Assessment and Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk Assessment and Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence |
title_short | Risk Assessment and Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence |
title_sort | risk assessment and cholangiocarcinoma: diagnostic management and artificial intelligence |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9952965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36829492 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology12020213 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT granatavincenza riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT fuscoroberta riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT demuziofederica riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT cutolocarmen riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT grassifrancesca riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT brunesemariachiara riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT simonettiigino riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT catalanoorlando riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT gabellonimichela riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT pradellasilvia riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT dantiginevra riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT flammiafederica riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT borgheresialessandra riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT agostiniandrea riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT brunofederico riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT palumbopierpaolo riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT ottaianoalessandro riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT izzofrancesco riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT giovagnoniandrea riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT barileantonio riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT gandolfonicoletta riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence AT mielevittorio riskassessmentandcholangiocarcinomadiagnosticmanagementandartificialintelligence |