Cargando…

Assessment of health equity consideration in Cochrane systematic reviews and primary studies on urolithiasis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Health injustice is defined as “unnecessary, preventable, unjustified and unfair health differences.” One of the most important scientific sources on the prevention and management of urolithiasis are Cochrane reviews in this field. Given that the first step in eliminating health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Basirat, Reyhane, Soleimani, Sevim, Shakiba, Behnam, Maghsoudi, Robab
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:	Original Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9953072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36846534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1133

Ejemplares similares

Castleman disease mimicking an adrenal tumor: A case report
por: Maghsoudi, Robab, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prioritising Cochrane reviews to be updated with health equity focus
por: Tomlinson, Eve, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Setting priorities for knowledge translation of Cochrane reviews for health equity: Evidence for Equity
por: Tugwell, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Quality Assessment of Studies Included in Cochrane Oral Health Systematic Reviews: A Meta-Research
por: Sofi-Mahmudi, Ahmad, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Empty Reviews: A Description and Consideration of Cochrane Systematic Reviews with No Included Studies
por: Yaffe, Joanne, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Considerations from the risk of bias perspective for updating Cochrane reviews
por: Mayhew, Alain D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Assessing the magnitude of changes from protocol to publication—a survey on Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Siebert, Maximilian, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Does Consideration and Assessment of Effects on Health Equity Affect the Conclusions of Systematic Reviews? A Methodology Study
por: Welch, Vivian, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Experts prioritize osteoarthritis non-surgical interventions from Cochrane systematic reviews for translation into “Evidence4Equity” summaries
por: Houlding-Braunberger, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cochrane Eyes and Vision: systematic reviews on myopia
por: Evans, Jennifer
Publicado: (2019)

The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview
por: Ji, Zhaochen, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
por: Langendam, Miranda W, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
por: Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Exercise/physical activity and health outcomes: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
por: Posadzki, Pawel, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Urolithiasis
Publicado: (2015)

Statistical Multiplicity in Systematic Reviews of Anaesthesia Interventions: A Quantification and Comparison between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Reviews
por: Imberger, Georgina, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Methodological quality and implications for practice of systematic Cochrane reviews in pediatric oral health: a critical assessment
por: Smaïl-Faugeron, Violaine, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The Evidence Base for Interventions Delivered to Children in Primary Care: An Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Gill, Peter J., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Metabolic assessment of elderly men with urolithiasis
por: Freitas, Celso Heitor, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Equity in Health: Consideration of Race and Ethnicity in Precision Medicine
por: Edwards, Todd L., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Considerations for addressing bias in artificial intelligence for health equity
por: Abràmoff, Michael D., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
por: Alderdice, Fiona, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The impact of Cochrane Systematic Reviews: a mixed method evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research
por: Bunn, Frances, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Economics methods in Cochrane systematic reviews of health promotion and public health related interventions
por: Shemilt, Ian, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Health equity considerations in guideline development: a rapid scoping review
por: Shaver, Nicole, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Chinese Herbal Medicines: An Overview
por: Hu, Jing, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Corticosteroids for sepsis: registry versus Cochrane systematic review!
por: Annane, Djillali
Publicado: (2010)

Ginseng for Erectile Dysfunction: A Cochrane Systematic Review
por: Lee, Hye Won, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Claims of ‘no difference’ or ‘no effect’ in Cochrane and other systematic reviews
por: Marson Smith, Phoebe Rose, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Sex and gender considerations in implementation interventions to promote shared decision making: A secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review
por: Adisso, Évèhouénou Lionel, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Assessments of Music Therapy for Dementia Based on the Cochrane Review
por: Abe, Makiko, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

6: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS IN COCHRANE ARRHYTHMIAS SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
por: Parnianfard, Neda, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Assessing imprecision in Cochrane systematic reviews: a comparison of GRADE and Trial Sequential Analysis
por: Castellini, Greta, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 10: Taking equity into consideration when assessing the findings of a systematic review
por: Oxman, Andrew D, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Assessment of health equity consideration in masking/PPE policies to contain COVID-19 using PROGRESS-plus framework: a systematic review
por: Chhibber, Anindit, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Alexander Cochran
Publicado: (1924)

Cochrane Pflegeforum
por: Legenstein, Karin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_5e9joe9or34ub69tr6bprrcg2g