Cargando…

Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques

Sperm separation plays a critical role in assisted reproductive technology. Based on migration, density gradient centrifugation and filtration, a properly selected sperm could help in increasing assisted reproductive outcomes in teratozoospermia (TZs). The current study aimed to assess the prognosti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bibi, Riffat, Jahan, Sarwat, Afsar, Tayyaba, Almajwal, Ali, Hammadeh, Mohamad Eid, Amor, Houda, Abusharha, Ali, Razak, Suhail
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9953211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36831003
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11020467
_version_ 1784893822026645504
author Bibi, Riffat
Jahan, Sarwat
Afsar, Tayyaba
Almajwal, Ali
Hammadeh, Mohamad Eid
Amor, Houda
Abusharha, Ali
Razak, Suhail
author_facet Bibi, Riffat
Jahan, Sarwat
Afsar, Tayyaba
Almajwal, Ali
Hammadeh, Mohamad Eid
Amor, Houda
Abusharha, Ali
Razak, Suhail
author_sort Bibi, Riffat
collection PubMed
description Sperm separation plays a critical role in assisted reproductive technology. Based on migration, density gradient centrifugation and filtration, a properly selected sperm could help in increasing assisted reproductive outcomes in teratozoospermia (TZs). The current study aimed to assess the prognostic value of four sperm selection techniques: density gradient centrifugation (DGC), swim-up (SU), DGC-SU and DGC followed by magnetic-activated cell sorting (DGC-MACS). These were evaluated using spermatozoa functional parameters. A total of 385 infertile couples underwent the procedure of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), with an isolated teratozoospermia in the male partner. Semen samples were prepared by using one of the mentioned sperm preparation techniques. The improvements in the percentage of normal mature spermatozoa, rate of fertilization, cleavage, pregnancy and the number of live births were assessed. The normal morphology, spermatozoa DNA fragmentation (SDF) and chromatin maturity checked by using chromomycin A3 (CMA3) with DGC-MACS preparation were better compared to the other three methods. Embryo cleavage, clinical pregnancy and implantation were better improved in the DGC-MACS than in the other tested techniques. The DGC-MACS technique helped in the selection of an increased percentage of normal viable and mature sperm with intact chromatin integrity in patients with teratozoospermia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9953211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99532112023-02-25 Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Bibi, Riffat Jahan, Sarwat Afsar, Tayyaba Almajwal, Ali Hammadeh, Mohamad Eid Amor, Houda Abusharha, Ali Razak, Suhail Biomedicines Article Sperm separation plays a critical role in assisted reproductive technology. Based on migration, density gradient centrifugation and filtration, a properly selected sperm could help in increasing assisted reproductive outcomes in teratozoospermia (TZs). The current study aimed to assess the prognostic value of four sperm selection techniques: density gradient centrifugation (DGC), swim-up (SU), DGC-SU and DGC followed by magnetic-activated cell sorting (DGC-MACS). These were evaluated using spermatozoa functional parameters. A total of 385 infertile couples underwent the procedure of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), with an isolated teratozoospermia in the male partner. Semen samples were prepared by using one of the mentioned sperm preparation techniques. The improvements in the percentage of normal mature spermatozoa, rate of fertilization, cleavage, pregnancy and the number of live births were assessed. The normal morphology, spermatozoa DNA fragmentation (SDF) and chromatin maturity checked by using chromomycin A3 (CMA3) with DGC-MACS preparation were better compared to the other three methods. Embryo cleavage, clinical pregnancy and implantation were better improved in the DGC-MACS than in the other tested techniques. The DGC-MACS technique helped in the selection of an increased percentage of normal viable and mature sperm with intact chromatin integrity in patients with teratozoospermia. MDPI 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9953211/ /pubmed/36831003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11020467 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bibi, Riffat
Jahan, Sarwat
Afsar, Tayyaba
Almajwal, Ali
Hammadeh, Mohamad Eid
Amor, Houda
Abusharha, Ali
Razak, Suhail
Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques
title Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques
title_full Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques
title_fullStr Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques
title_short Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques
title_sort analyzing the differential impact of semen preparation methods on the outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9953211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36831003
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11020467
work_keys_str_mv AT bibiriffat analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques
AT jahansarwat analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques
AT afsartayyaba analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques
AT almajwalali analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques
AT hammadehmohamadeid analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques
AT amorhouda analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques
AT abusharhaali analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques
AT razaksuhail analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques