Cargando…
Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Sperm separation plays a critical role in assisted reproductive technology. Based on migration, density gradient centrifugation and filtration, a properly selected sperm could help in increasing assisted reproductive outcomes in teratozoospermia (TZs). The current study aimed to assess the prognosti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9953211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36831003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11020467 |
_version_ | 1784893822026645504 |
---|---|
author | Bibi, Riffat Jahan, Sarwat Afsar, Tayyaba Almajwal, Ali Hammadeh, Mohamad Eid Amor, Houda Abusharha, Ali Razak, Suhail |
author_facet | Bibi, Riffat Jahan, Sarwat Afsar, Tayyaba Almajwal, Ali Hammadeh, Mohamad Eid Amor, Houda Abusharha, Ali Razak, Suhail |
author_sort | Bibi, Riffat |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sperm separation plays a critical role in assisted reproductive technology. Based on migration, density gradient centrifugation and filtration, a properly selected sperm could help in increasing assisted reproductive outcomes in teratozoospermia (TZs). The current study aimed to assess the prognostic value of four sperm selection techniques: density gradient centrifugation (DGC), swim-up (SU), DGC-SU and DGC followed by magnetic-activated cell sorting (DGC-MACS). These were evaluated using spermatozoa functional parameters. A total of 385 infertile couples underwent the procedure of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), with an isolated teratozoospermia in the male partner. Semen samples were prepared by using one of the mentioned sperm preparation techniques. The improvements in the percentage of normal mature spermatozoa, rate of fertilization, cleavage, pregnancy and the number of live births were assessed. The normal morphology, spermatozoa DNA fragmentation (SDF) and chromatin maturity checked by using chromomycin A3 (CMA3) with DGC-MACS preparation were better compared to the other three methods. Embryo cleavage, clinical pregnancy and implantation were better improved in the DGC-MACS than in the other tested techniques. The DGC-MACS technique helped in the selection of an increased percentage of normal viable and mature sperm with intact chromatin integrity in patients with teratozoospermia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9953211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99532112023-02-25 Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Bibi, Riffat Jahan, Sarwat Afsar, Tayyaba Almajwal, Ali Hammadeh, Mohamad Eid Amor, Houda Abusharha, Ali Razak, Suhail Biomedicines Article Sperm separation plays a critical role in assisted reproductive technology. Based on migration, density gradient centrifugation and filtration, a properly selected sperm could help in increasing assisted reproductive outcomes in teratozoospermia (TZs). The current study aimed to assess the prognostic value of four sperm selection techniques: density gradient centrifugation (DGC), swim-up (SU), DGC-SU and DGC followed by magnetic-activated cell sorting (DGC-MACS). These were evaluated using spermatozoa functional parameters. A total of 385 infertile couples underwent the procedure of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), with an isolated teratozoospermia in the male partner. Semen samples were prepared by using one of the mentioned sperm preparation techniques. The improvements in the percentage of normal mature spermatozoa, rate of fertilization, cleavage, pregnancy and the number of live births were assessed. The normal morphology, spermatozoa DNA fragmentation (SDF) and chromatin maturity checked by using chromomycin A3 (CMA3) with DGC-MACS preparation were better compared to the other three methods. Embryo cleavage, clinical pregnancy and implantation were better improved in the DGC-MACS than in the other tested techniques. The DGC-MACS technique helped in the selection of an increased percentage of normal viable and mature sperm with intact chromatin integrity in patients with teratozoospermia. MDPI 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9953211/ /pubmed/36831003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11020467 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bibi, Riffat Jahan, Sarwat Afsar, Tayyaba Almajwal, Ali Hammadeh, Mohamad Eid Amor, Houda Abusharha, Ali Razak, Suhail Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques |
title | Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques |
title_full | Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques |
title_fullStr | Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques |
title_short | Analyzing the Differential Impact of Semen Preparation Methods on the Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Techniques |
title_sort | analyzing the differential impact of semen preparation methods on the outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9953211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36831003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11020467 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bibiriffat analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques AT jahansarwat analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques AT afsartayyaba analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques AT almajwalali analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques AT hammadehmohamadeid analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques AT amorhouda analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques AT abusharhaali analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques AT razaksuhail analyzingthedifferentialimpactofsemenpreparationmethodsontheoutcomesofassistedreproductivetechniques |