Cargando…
Pre-Stimulus Power but Not Phase Predicts Prefrontal Cortical Excitability in TMS-EEG
The cortical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has notable inter-trial variability. One source of this variability can be the influence of the phase and power of pre-stimulus neuronal oscillations on single-trial TMS responses. Here, we investigate the effect of brain oscillatory a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9953459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36831986 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios13020220 |
_version_ | 1784893882976174080 |
---|---|
author | Poorganji, Mohsen Zomorrodi, Reza Zrenner, Christoph Bansal, Aiyush Hawco, Colin Hill, Aron T. Hadas, Itay Rajji, Tarek K. Chen, Robert Zrenner, Brigitte Voineskos, Daphne Blumberger, Daniel M. Daskalakis, Zafiris J. |
author_facet | Poorganji, Mohsen Zomorrodi, Reza Zrenner, Christoph Bansal, Aiyush Hawco, Colin Hill, Aron T. Hadas, Itay Rajji, Tarek K. Chen, Robert Zrenner, Brigitte Voineskos, Daphne Blumberger, Daniel M. Daskalakis, Zafiris J. |
author_sort | Poorganji, Mohsen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The cortical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has notable inter-trial variability. One source of this variability can be the influence of the phase and power of pre-stimulus neuronal oscillations on single-trial TMS responses. Here, we investigate the effect of brain oscillatory activity on TMS response in 49 distinct healthy participants (64 datasets) who had received single-pulse TMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Across all frequency bands of theta (4–7 Hz), alpha (8–13 Hz), and beta (14–30 Hz), there was no significant effect of pre-TMS phase on single-trial cortical evoked activity. After high-powered oscillations, whether followed by a TMS pulse or not, the subsequent activity was larger than after low-powered oscillations. We further defined a measure, corrected_effect, to enable us to investigate brain responses to the TMS pulse disentangled from the power of ongoing (spontaneous) oscillations. The corrected_effect was significantly different from zero (meaningful added effect of TMS) only in theta and beta bands. Our results suggest that brain state prior to stimulation might play some role in shaping the subsequent TMS-EEG response. Specifically, our findings indicate that the power of ongoing oscillatory activity, but not phase, can influence brain responses to TMS. Aligning the TMS pulse with specific power thresholds of an EEG signal might therefore reduce variability in neurophysiological measurements and also has the potential to facilitate more robust therapeutic effects of stimulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9953459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99534592023-02-25 Pre-Stimulus Power but Not Phase Predicts Prefrontal Cortical Excitability in TMS-EEG Poorganji, Mohsen Zomorrodi, Reza Zrenner, Christoph Bansal, Aiyush Hawco, Colin Hill, Aron T. Hadas, Itay Rajji, Tarek K. Chen, Robert Zrenner, Brigitte Voineskos, Daphne Blumberger, Daniel M. Daskalakis, Zafiris J. Biosensors (Basel) Article The cortical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has notable inter-trial variability. One source of this variability can be the influence of the phase and power of pre-stimulus neuronal oscillations on single-trial TMS responses. Here, we investigate the effect of brain oscillatory activity on TMS response in 49 distinct healthy participants (64 datasets) who had received single-pulse TMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Across all frequency bands of theta (4–7 Hz), alpha (8–13 Hz), and beta (14–30 Hz), there was no significant effect of pre-TMS phase on single-trial cortical evoked activity. After high-powered oscillations, whether followed by a TMS pulse or not, the subsequent activity was larger than after low-powered oscillations. We further defined a measure, corrected_effect, to enable us to investigate brain responses to the TMS pulse disentangled from the power of ongoing (spontaneous) oscillations. The corrected_effect was significantly different from zero (meaningful added effect of TMS) only in theta and beta bands. Our results suggest that brain state prior to stimulation might play some role in shaping the subsequent TMS-EEG response. Specifically, our findings indicate that the power of ongoing oscillatory activity, but not phase, can influence brain responses to TMS. Aligning the TMS pulse with specific power thresholds of an EEG signal might therefore reduce variability in neurophysiological measurements and also has the potential to facilitate more robust therapeutic effects of stimulation. MDPI 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9953459/ /pubmed/36831986 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios13020220 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Poorganji, Mohsen Zomorrodi, Reza Zrenner, Christoph Bansal, Aiyush Hawco, Colin Hill, Aron T. Hadas, Itay Rajji, Tarek K. Chen, Robert Zrenner, Brigitte Voineskos, Daphne Blumberger, Daniel M. Daskalakis, Zafiris J. Pre-Stimulus Power but Not Phase Predicts Prefrontal Cortical Excitability in TMS-EEG |
title | Pre-Stimulus Power but Not Phase Predicts Prefrontal Cortical Excitability in TMS-EEG |
title_full | Pre-Stimulus Power but Not Phase Predicts Prefrontal Cortical Excitability in TMS-EEG |
title_fullStr | Pre-Stimulus Power but Not Phase Predicts Prefrontal Cortical Excitability in TMS-EEG |
title_full_unstemmed | Pre-Stimulus Power but Not Phase Predicts Prefrontal Cortical Excitability in TMS-EEG |
title_short | Pre-Stimulus Power but Not Phase Predicts Prefrontal Cortical Excitability in TMS-EEG |
title_sort | pre-stimulus power but not phase predicts prefrontal cortical excitability in tms-eeg |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9953459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36831986 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios13020220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poorganjimohsen prestimuluspowerbutnotphasepredictsprefrontalcorticalexcitabilityintmseeg AT zomorrodireza prestimuluspowerbutnotphasepredictsprefrontalcorticalexcitabilityintmseeg AT zrennerchristoph prestimuluspowerbutnotphasepredictsprefrontalcorticalexcitabilityintmseeg AT bansalaiyush prestimuluspowerbutnotphasepredictsprefrontalcorticalexcitabilityintmseeg AT hawcocolin prestimuluspowerbutnotphasepredictsprefrontalcorticalexcitabilityintmseeg AT hillaront prestimuluspowerbutnotphasepredictsprefrontalcorticalexcitabilityintmseeg AT hadasitay prestimuluspowerbutnotphasepredictsprefrontalcorticalexcitabilityintmseeg AT rajjitarekk prestimuluspowerbutnotphasepredictsprefrontalcorticalexcitabilityintmseeg AT chenrobert prestimuluspowerbutnotphasepredictsprefrontalcorticalexcitabilityintmseeg AT zrennerbrigitte prestimuluspowerbutnotphasepredictsprefrontalcorticalexcitabilityintmseeg AT voineskosdaphne prestimuluspowerbutnotphasepredictsprefrontalcorticalexcitabilityintmseeg AT blumbergerdanielm prestimuluspowerbutnotphasepredictsprefrontalcorticalexcitabilityintmseeg AT daskalakiszafirisj prestimuluspowerbutnotphasepredictsprefrontalcorticalexcitabilityintmseeg |