Ten Considerations for Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes into Clinical Care for Childhood Cancer Survivors

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are a useful way to assess the subjective experiences of health-related quality of life, functional status, symptoms, and other outcomes in childhood cancer survivors. In survivorship care, PROMs can be used to monitor health status and inform medical decision making. This article provides 10 important considerations for clinicians when they are assessing patient-reported outcomes for childhood cancer survivors. From choosing the right measure to selecting a strategy for clinical response, the purpose of these considerations is to support clinicians in implementing PROMs in their practice while keeping in mind some of the practical barriers and solutions of using PROMs with childhood cancer survivors. We end with an example of a framework for integrating PROMs into the clinical workflow that uses cutting-edge technologies (e.g., mHealth, natural language processing, and machine learning) to minimize interruptions to the clinical workflow and maximize the powerful utility of PROMs in cancer survivorship care. ABSTRACT: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are subjective assessments of health status or health-related quality of life. In childhood cancer survivors, PROMs can be used to evaluate the adverse effects of cancer treatment and guide cancer survivorship care. However, there are barriers to integrating PROMs into clinical practice, such as constraints in clinical validity, meaningful interpretation, and technology-enabled administration of the measures. This article discusses these barriers and proposes 10 important considerations for appropriate PROM integration into clinical care for choosing the right measure (considering the purpose of using a PROM, health profile vs. health preference approaches, measurement properties), ensuring survivors complete the PROMs (data collection method, data collection frequency, survivor capacity, self- vs. proxy reports), interpreting the results (scoring methods, clinical meaning and interpretability), and selecting a strategy for clinical response (integration into the clinical workflow). An example framework for integrating novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection into the clinical workflow for childhood cancer survivorship care is also discussed. As we continuously improve the clinical validity of PROMs and address implementation barriers, routine PRO assessment and monitoring in pediatric cancer survivorship offer opportunities to facilitate clinical decision making and improve the quality of survivorship care.