Cargando…

Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy: Experience at a university hospital in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the procedure of choice for treating most gallbladder pathology, has become the most trusted elective procedure for treating gallstone disease because of its effectiveness and safety. While the timing is an important factor in those cases, our aim in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amer, Nasser M., Alarfaj, Mosab A., Othman, Sharifah A., Alshammary, Shadi, Alshammari, Eiman M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9954423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36843867
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_116_22
_version_ 1784894113775091712
author Amer, Nasser M.
Alarfaj, Mosab A.
Othman, Sharifah A.
Alshammary, Shadi
Alshammari, Eiman M.
author_facet Amer, Nasser M.
Alarfaj, Mosab A.
Othman, Sharifah A.
Alshammary, Shadi
Alshammari, Eiman M.
author_sort Amer, Nasser M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the procedure of choice for treating most gallbladder pathology, has become the most trusted elective procedure for treating gallstone disease because of its effectiveness and safety. While the timing is an important factor in those cases, our aim in this study was to compare emergency and elective LC, determine the differences in postoperative complications, and assess the conversion rate to open cholecystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included a total of 627 patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy during 2017-2019 at King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU). Records of both emergency and elective cases were reviewed from Quadra-med (software package). All demographic data of the patients, presenting complaint, laboratory and inflammatory marker, type of the operation, intraoperative complications, procedure time, conversion rate from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy, postoperative period, length of hospital stay, and pathological diagnosis were entered into an Excel sheet. The data was analyzed using SPSS 23.0. Qualitative variables were described as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables were summarized with mean and standard deviation (SD). Chi-square test, t-test, and the Mann–Whitney U-test were applied to test for statistical significance at P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: The mean age for patients undergoing elective LC was 39.94 years (SD=13.56) whereas, mean age of patients undergoing emergency LC was 40.64 years (SD=13.02). About 71% of cases in elective LC group were females compared to 55% in the emergency LC group. There was a significant difference in C-reactive protein (CRP) in relation to the type of surgery where P < 0.05. Twelve (1.9%) patients had subtotal cholecystectomy and two cases converted from LC to open. There was a significant association between postoperative complication and the type of surgery. The length of hospital stay (LOS) was also found to be significantly more in patients having emergency LC (6.0 vs. 4.5 d; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The relation between conversion to an open procedure and type of surgery (elective or emergency) in our study was nonsignificant. There was a significant association between preoperative CRP, postoperative complication, length of hospital stay, and type of surgery. Further multicenter studies are required for further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9954423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99544232023-02-25 Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy: Experience at a university hospital in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia Amer, Nasser M. Alarfaj, Mosab A. Othman, Sharifah A. Alshammary, Shadi Alshammari, Eiman M. J Family Community Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the procedure of choice for treating most gallbladder pathology, has become the most trusted elective procedure for treating gallstone disease because of its effectiveness and safety. While the timing is an important factor in those cases, our aim in this study was to compare emergency and elective LC, determine the differences in postoperative complications, and assess the conversion rate to open cholecystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included a total of 627 patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy during 2017-2019 at King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU). Records of both emergency and elective cases were reviewed from Quadra-med (software package). All demographic data of the patients, presenting complaint, laboratory and inflammatory marker, type of the operation, intraoperative complications, procedure time, conversion rate from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy, postoperative period, length of hospital stay, and pathological diagnosis were entered into an Excel sheet. The data was analyzed using SPSS 23.0. Qualitative variables were described as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables were summarized with mean and standard deviation (SD). Chi-square test, t-test, and the Mann–Whitney U-test were applied to test for statistical significance at P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: The mean age for patients undergoing elective LC was 39.94 years (SD=13.56) whereas, mean age of patients undergoing emergency LC was 40.64 years (SD=13.02). About 71% of cases in elective LC group were females compared to 55% in the emergency LC group. There was a significant difference in C-reactive protein (CRP) in relation to the type of surgery where P < 0.05. Twelve (1.9%) patients had subtotal cholecystectomy and two cases converted from LC to open. There was a significant association between postoperative complication and the type of surgery. The length of hospital stay (LOS) was also found to be significantly more in patients having emergency LC (6.0 vs. 4.5 d; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The relation between conversion to an open procedure and type of surgery (elective or emergency) in our study was nonsignificant. There was a significant association between preoperative CRP, postoperative complication, length of hospital stay, and type of surgery. Further multicenter studies are required for further investigation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9954423/ /pubmed/36843867 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_116_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Family and Community Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Amer, Nasser M.
Alarfaj, Mosab A.
Othman, Sharifah A.
Alshammary, Shadi
Alshammari, Eiman M.
Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy: Experience at a university hospital in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
title Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy: Experience at a university hospital in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
title_full Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy: Experience at a university hospital in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy: Experience at a university hospital in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy: Experience at a university hospital in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
title_short Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy: Experience at a university hospital in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
title_sort emergency versus elective cholecystectomy: experience at a university hospital in the eastern province, saudi arabia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9954423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36843867
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_116_22
work_keys_str_mv AT amernasserm emergencyversuselectivecholecystectomyexperienceatauniversityhospitalintheeasternprovincesaudiarabia
AT alarfajmosaba emergencyversuselectivecholecystectomyexperienceatauniversityhospitalintheeasternprovincesaudiarabia
AT othmansharifaha emergencyversuselectivecholecystectomyexperienceatauniversityhospitalintheeasternprovincesaudiarabia
AT alshammaryshadi emergencyversuselectivecholecystectomyexperienceatauniversityhospitalintheeasternprovincesaudiarabia
AT alshammarieimanm emergencyversuselectivecholecystectomyexperienceatauniversityhospitalintheeasternprovincesaudiarabia