Cargando…
Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Robotic devices are being actively introduced into the urology field. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable csPCa and over...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9954527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36831524 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041181 |
_version_ | 1784894139348811776 |
---|---|
author | Petov, Vladislav Azilgareeva, Camilla Shpikina, Anastasia Morozov, Andrey Krupinov, German Kozlov, Vasiliy Singla, Nirmish Gómez Rivas, Juan Jesús, Moreno-Sierra Puliatti, Stefano Checcucci, Enrico Rodler, Severin Belenchon, Ines Rivero Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich Veccia, Alessandro Mcfarland, Jonathan Cacciamani, Giovanni E. Taratkin, Mark Enikeev, Dmitry |
author_facet | Petov, Vladislav Azilgareeva, Camilla Shpikina, Anastasia Morozov, Andrey Krupinov, German Kozlov, Vasiliy Singla, Nirmish Gómez Rivas, Juan Jesús, Moreno-Sierra Puliatti, Stefano Checcucci, Enrico Rodler, Severin Belenchon, Ines Rivero Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich Veccia, Alessandro Mcfarland, Jonathan Cacciamani, Giovanni E. Taratkin, Mark Enikeev, Dmitry |
author_sort | Petov, Vladislav |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Robotic devices are being actively introduced into the urology field. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable csPCa and overall detection rates [OR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.83; 1.26), p = 0.05, I(2) = 62% and OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.78; 1.17), p = 0.17, I(2) = 40%, respectively]. A robot-assisted biopsy can potentially be performed under local anesthesia or sedation. Furthermore, a robot-assisted biopsy is a safe and feasible option with a low risk of complications. ABSTRACT: Introduction: Robot-assisted devices have been recently developed for use in prostate biopsy. However, it is possible advantages over standard biopsy remain unclear. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The detailed search strategy is available at Prospero (CRD42021269290). The primary outcome was the clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. The secondary outcomes included the overall detection rate of PCa, cancer detection rate per core, and complications. Results: The clinically significant cancer detection rate, overall cancer detection rate, and “per patient” did not significantly differ between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.83; 1.26), p = 0.05, I(2) = 62% and OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.78; 1.17), p = 0.17, I(2) = 40%, respectively]. There were no differences in the clinically insignificant cancer detection rate “per patient” between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.54; 1.21), p = 0.31, I(2) = 0%]. RA-TB had a significantly higher cancer detection rate “per core” [OR = 3.01 (95% CI 2.77; 3.27), p < 0.0001, I(2) = 96%]. Conclusion: RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable clinical significance and overall PCa detection rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9954527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99545272023-02-25 Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Petov, Vladislav Azilgareeva, Camilla Shpikina, Anastasia Morozov, Andrey Krupinov, German Kozlov, Vasiliy Singla, Nirmish Gómez Rivas, Juan Jesús, Moreno-Sierra Puliatti, Stefano Checcucci, Enrico Rodler, Severin Belenchon, Ines Rivero Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich Veccia, Alessandro Mcfarland, Jonathan Cacciamani, Giovanni E. Taratkin, Mark Enikeev, Dmitry Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Robotic devices are being actively introduced into the urology field. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable csPCa and overall detection rates [OR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.83; 1.26), p = 0.05, I(2) = 62% and OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.78; 1.17), p = 0.17, I(2) = 40%, respectively]. A robot-assisted biopsy can potentially be performed under local anesthesia or sedation. Furthermore, a robot-assisted biopsy is a safe and feasible option with a low risk of complications. ABSTRACT: Introduction: Robot-assisted devices have been recently developed for use in prostate biopsy. However, it is possible advantages over standard biopsy remain unclear. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The detailed search strategy is available at Prospero (CRD42021269290). The primary outcome was the clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. The secondary outcomes included the overall detection rate of PCa, cancer detection rate per core, and complications. Results: The clinically significant cancer detection rate, overall cancer detection rate, and “per patient” did not significantly differ between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.83; 1.26), p = 0.05, I(2) = 62% and OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.78; 1.17), p = 0.17, I(2) = 40%, respectively]. There were no differences in the clinically insignificant cancer detection rate “per patient” between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.54; 1.21), p = 0.31, I(2) = 0%]. RA-TB had a significantly higher cancer detection rate “per core” [OR = 3.01 (95% CI 2.77; 3.27), p < 0.0001, I(2) = 96%]. Conclusion: RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable clinical significance and overall PCa detection rates. MDPI 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9954527/ /pubmed/36831524 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041181 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Petov, Vladislav Azilgareeva, Camilla Shpikina, Anastasia Morozov, Andrey Krupinov, German Kozlov, Vasiliy Singla, Nirmish Gómez Rivas, Juan Jesús, Moreno-Sierra Puliatti, Stefano Checcucci, Enrico Rodler, Severin Belenchon, Ines Rivero Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich Veccia, Alessandro Mcfarland, Jonathan Cacciamani, Giovanni E. Taratkin, Mark Enikeev, Dmitry Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | robot-assisted magnetic resonance imaging-targeted versus systematic prostate biopsy; systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9954527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36831524 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041181 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petovvladislav robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT azilgareevacamilla robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shpikinaanastasia robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT morozovandrey robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT krupinovgerman robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kozlovvasiliy robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT singlanirmish robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gomezrivasjuan robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jesusmorenosierra robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT puliattistefano robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT checcuccienrico robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rodlerseverin robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT belenchoninesrivero robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kowalewskikarlfriedrich robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vecciaalessandro robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mcfarlandjonathan robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cacciamanigiovannie robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT taratkinmark robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT enikeevdmitry robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |