Cargando…

Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Robotic devices are being actively introduced into the urology field. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable csPCa and over...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petov, Vladislav, Azilgareeva, Camilla, Shpikina, Anastasia, Morozov, Andrey, Krupinov, German, Kozlov, Vasiliy, Singla, Nirmish, Gómez Rivas, Juan, Jesús, Moreno-Sierra, Puliatti, Stefano, Checcucci, Enrico, Rodler, Severin, Belenchon, Ines Rivero, Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich, Veccia, Alessandro, Mcfarland, Jonathan, Cacciamani, Giovanni E., Taratkin, Mark, Enikeev, Dmitry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9954527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36831524
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041181
_version_ 1784894139348811776
author Petov, Vladislav
Azilgareeva, Camilla
Shpikina, Anastasia
Morozov, Andrey
Krupinov, German
Kozlov, Vasiliy
Singla, Nirmish
Gómez Rivas, Juan
Jesús, Moreno-Sierra
Puliatti, Stefano
Checcucci, Enrico
Rodler, Severin
Belenchon, Ines Rivero
Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich
Veccia, Alessandro
Mcfarland, Jonathan
Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
Taratkin, Mark
Enikeev, Dmitry
author_facet Petov, Vladislav
Azilgareeva, Camilla
Shpikina, Anastasia
Morozov, Andrey
Krupinov, German
Kozlov, Vasiliy
Singla, Nirmish
Gómez Rivas, Juan
Jesús, Moreno-Sierra
Puliatti, Stefano
Checcucci, Enrico
Rodler, Severin
Belenchon, Ines Rivero
Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich
Veccia, Alessandro
Mcfarland, Jonathan
Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
Taratkin, Mark
Enikeev, Dmitry
author_sort Petov, Vladislav
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Robotic devices are being actively introduced into the urology field. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable csPCa and overall detection rates [OR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.83; 1.26), p = 0.05, I(2) = 62% and OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.78; 1.17), p = 0.17, I(2) = 40%, respectively]. A robot-assisted biopsy can potentially be performed under local anesthesia or sedation. Furthermore, a robot-assisted biopsy is a safe and feasible option with a low risk of complications. ABSTRACT: Introduction: Robot-assisted devices have been recently developed for use in prostate biopsy. However, it is possible advantages over standard biopsy remain unclear. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The detailed search strategy is available at Prospero (CRD42021269290). The primary outcome was the clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. The secondary outcomes included the overall detection rate of PCa, cancer detection rate per core, and complications. Results: The clinically significant cancer detection rate, overall cancer detection rate, and “per patient” did not significantly differ between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.83; 1.26), p = 0.05, I(2) = 62% and OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.78; 1.17), p = 0.17, I(2) = 40%, respectively]. There were no differences in the clinically insignificant cancer detection rate “per patient” between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.54; 1.21), p = 0.31, I(2) = 0%]. RA-TB had a significantly higher cancer detection rate “per core” [OR = 3.01 (95% CI 2.77; 3.27), p < 0.0001, I(2) = 96%]. Conclusion: RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable clinical significance and overall PCa detection rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9954527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99545272023-02-25 Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Petov, Vladislav Azilgareeva, Camilla Shpikina, Anastasia Morozov, Andrey Krupinov, German Kozlov, Vasiliy Singla, Nirmish Gómez Rivas, Juan Jesús, Moreno-Sierra Puliatti, Stefano Checcucci, Enrico Rodler, Severin Belenchon, Ines Rivero Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich Veccia, Alessandro Mcfarland, Jonathan Cacciamani, Giovanni E. Taratkin, Mark Enikeev, Dmitry Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Robotic devices are being actively introduced into the urology field. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable csPCa and overall detection rates [OR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.83; 1.26), p = 0.05, I(2) = 62% and OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.78; 1.17), p = 0.17, I(2) = 40%, respectively]. A robot-assisted biopsy can potentially be performed under local anesthesia or sedation. Furthermore, a robot-assisted biopsy is a safe and feasible option with a low risk of complications. ABSTRACT: Introduction: Robot-assisted devices have been recently developed for use in prostate biopsy. However, it is possible advantages over standard biopsy remain unclear. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The detailed search strategy is available at Prospero (CRD42021269290). The primary outcome was the clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. The secondary outcomes included the overall detection rate of PCa, cancer detection rate per core, and complications. Results: The clinically significant cancer detection rate, overall cancer detection rate, and “per patient” did not significantly differ between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.83; 1.26), p = 0.05, I(2) = 62% and OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.78; 1.17), p = 0.17, I(2) = 40%, respectively]. There were no differences in the clinically insignificant cancer detection rate “per patient” between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.54; 1.21), p = 0.31, I(2) = 0%]. RA-TB had a significantly higher cancer detection rate “per core” [OR = 3.01 (95% CI 2.77; 3.27), p < 0.0001, I(2) = 96%]. Conclusion: RA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable clinical significance and overall PCa detection rates. MDPI 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9954527/ /pubmed/36831524 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041181 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Petov, Vladislav
Azilgareeva, Camilla
Shpikina, Anastasia
Morozov, Andrey
Krupinov, German
Kozlov, Vasiliy
Singla, Nirmish
Gómez Rivas, Juan
Jesús, Moreno-Sierra
Puliatti, Stefano
Checcucci, Enrico
Rodler, Severin
Belenchon, Ines Rivero
Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich
Veccia, Alessandro
Mcfarland, Jonathan
Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
Taratkin, Mark
Enikeev, Dmitry
Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort robot-assisted magnetic resonance imaging-targeted versus systematic prostate biopsy; systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9954527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36831524
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041181
work_keys_str_mv AT petovvladislav robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT azilgareevacamilla robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shpikinaanastasia robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT morozovandrey robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT krupinovgerman robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kozlovvasiliy robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT singlanirmish robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gomezrivasjuan robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jesusmorenosierra robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT puliattistefano robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT checcuccienrico robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rodlerseverin robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT belenchoninesrivero robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kowalewskikarlfriedrich robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vecciaalessandro robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mcfarlandjonathan robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cacciamanigiovannie robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT taratkinmark robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT enikeevdmitry robotassistedmagneticresonanceimagingtargetedversussystematicprostatebiopsysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis