Cargando…

Evaluation of the EPR Effect in the CAM-Model by Molecular Imaging with MRI and PET Using (89)Zr-Labeled HSA

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The CAM model is a promising alternative to murine models in terms of the 3Rs principles. However, its value for the noninvasive assessment of the biodistribution and accumulation of radiolabeled macromolecules by PET and MR imaging needs further evaluation. Thus, we analyzed the bio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hilbrig, Colmar, Löffler, Jessica, Fischer, Gabriel, Scheidhauer, Ellen, Solbach, Christoph, Huber-Lang, Markus, Beer, Ambros J., Rasche, Volker, Winter, Gordon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9954539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36831469
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041126
_version_ 1784894142112858112
author Hilbrig, Colmar
Löffler, Jessica
Fischer, Gabriel
Scheidhauer, Ellen
Solbach, Christoph
Huber-Lang, Markus
Beer, Ambros J.
Rasche, Volker
Winter, Gordon
author_facet Hilbrig, Colmar
Löffler, Jessica
Fischer, Gabriel
Scheidhauer, Ellen
Solbach, Christoph
Huber-Lang, Markus
Beer, Ambros J.
Rasche, Volker
Winter, Gordon
author_sort Hilbrig, Colmar
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The CAM model is a promising alternative to murine models in terms of the 3Rs principles. However, its value for the noninvasive assessment of the biodistribution and accumulation of radiolabeled macromolecules by PET and MR imaging needs further evaluation. Thus, we analyzed the biodistribution and nonspecific tumor accumulation based on the EPR effect of (89)Zr-labeled human serum albumin by PET and MRI in the xenograft CAM model. The results were correlated to in vivo results from the xenografted mouse model as the standard of reference. In both models, the xenografted TZM-bl and PC-3 tumors were visualized by PET imaging after 24 h. Furthermore, no significant differences were detected concerning the influx kinetics of (89)Zr-labeled albumin into the two tumors. Therefore, the chicken model is a potential alternative to the animal model for initial PET studies on the characteristics of EPR-dependent target accumulation of radiolabeled macromolecules. ABSTRACT: Mouse models are commonly used to study the biodistribution of novel radioligands, but alternative models corresponding to the 3Rs principles, such as the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model, are highly required. While there are promising data from the CAM model regarding target-specific radiolabeled compounds, its utility for assessing macromolecule biodistribution and analyzing the EPR effect remains to demonstrated. Using (89)Zr-labeled human serum albumin, the accumulation of nontarget-specific macromolecules in CAM and mouse xenograft models was studied using PET and MRI. Therefore, the radioligand [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-HSA was analyzed in both chicken embryos (n = 5) and SCID mice (n = 4), each with TZM-bl and PC-3 tumor entities. Dynamic PET and anatomical MRI, as well as ex vivo biodistribution analyses, were performed to assess ligand distribution over 24 h. Histological staining and autoradiography verified the intratumoral accumulation. The tumors were successfully visualized for CAM and mouse models by PET, and the albumin influx from the blood into the respective tumors did not differ significantly. The accumulation and retention of HSA in tumors due to the EPR effect was demonstrated for both models. These results highlight that the CAM model is a potential alternative to the mouse model for initial studies with novel radiolabeled macromolecules with respect to the 3Rs principles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9954539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99545392023-02-25 Evaluation of the EPR Effect in the CAM-Model by Molecular Imaging with MRI and PET Using (89)Zr-Labeled HSA Hilbrig, Colmar Löffler, Jessica Fischer, Gabriel Scheidhauer, Ellen Solbach, Christoph Huber-Lang, Markus Beer, Ambros J. Rasche, Volker Winter, Gordon Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The CAM model is a promising alternative to murine models in terms of the 3Rs principles. However, its value for the noninvasive assessment of the biodistribution and accumulation of radiolabeled macromolecules by PET and MR imaging needs further evaluation. Thus, we analyzed the biodistribution and nonspecific tumor accumulation based on the EPR effect of (89)Zr-labeled human serum albumin by PET and MRI in the xenograft CAM model. The results were correlated to in vivo results from the xenografted mouse model as the standard of reference. In both models, the xenografted TZM-bl and PC-3 tumors were visualized by PET imaging after 24 h. Furthermore, no significant differences were detected concerning the influx kinetics of (89)Zr-labeled albumin into the two tumors. Therefore, the chicken model is a potential alternative to the animal model for initial PET studies on the characteristics of EPR-dependent target accumulation of radiolabeled macromolecules. ABSTRACT: Mouse models are commonly used to study the biodistribution of novel radioligands, but alternative models corresponding to the 3Rs principles, such as the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model, are highly required. While there are promising data from the CAM model regarding target-specific radiolabeled compounds, its utility for assessing macromolecule biodistribution and analyzing the EPR effect remains to demonstrated. Using (89)Zr-labeled human serum albumin, the accumulation of nontarget-specific macromolecules in CAM and mouse xenograft models was studied using PET and MRI. Therefore, the radioligand [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-HSA was analyzed in both chicken embryos (n = 5) and SCID mice (n = 4), each with TZM-bl and PC-3 tumor entities. Dynamic PET and anatomical MRI, as well as ex vivo biodistribution analyses, were performed to assess ligand distribution over 24 h. Histological staining and autoradiography verified the intratumoral accumulation. The tumors were successfully visualized for CAM and mouse models by PET, and the albumin influx from the blood into the respective tumors did not differ significantly. The accumulation and retention of HSA in tumors due to the EPR effect was demonstrated for both models. These results highlight that the CAM model is a potential alternative to the mouse model for initial studies with novel radiolabeled macromolecules with respect to the 3Rs principles. MDPI 2023-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9954539/ /pubmed/36831469 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041126 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hilbrig, Colmar
Löffler, Jessica
Fischer, Gabriel
Scheidhauer, Ellen
Solbach, Christoph
Huber-Lang, Markus
Beer, Ambros J.
Rasche, Volker
Winter, Gordon
Evaluation of the EPR Effect in the CAM-Model by Molecular Imaging with MRI and PET Using (89)Zr-Labeled HSA
title Evaluation of the EPR Effect in the CAM-Model by Molecular Imaging with MRI and PET Using (89)Zr-Labeled HSA
title_full Evaluation of the EPR Effect in the CAM-Model by Molecular Imaging with MRI and PET Using (89)Zr-Labeled HSA
title_fullStr Evaluation of the EPR Effect in the CAM-Model by Molecular Imaging with MRI and PET Using (89)Zr-Labeled HSA
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the EPR Effect in the CAM-Model by Molecular Imaging with MRI and PET Using (89)Zr-Labeled HSA
title_short Evaluation of the EPR Effect in the CAM-Model by Molecular Imaging with MRI and PET Using (89)Zr-Labeled HSA
title_sort evaluation of the epr effect in the cam-model by molecular imaging with mri and pet using (89)zr-labeled hsa
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9954539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36831469
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041126
work_keys_str_mv AT hilbrigcolmar evaluationoftheepreffectinthecammodelbymolecularimagingwithmriandpetusing89zrlabeledhsa
AT lofflerjessica evaluationoftheepreffectinthecammodelbymolecularimagingwithmriandpetusing89zrlabeledhsa
AT fischergabriel evaluationoftheepreffectinthecammodelbymolecularimagingwithmriandpetusing89zrlabeledhsa
AT scheidhauerellen evaluationoftheepreffectinthecammodelbymolecularimagingwithmriandpetusing89zrlabeledhsa
AT solbachchristoph evaluationoftheepreffectinthecammodelbymolecularimagingwithmriandpetusing89zrlabeledhsa
AT huberlangmarkus evaluationoftheepreffectinthecammodelbymolecularimagingwithmriandpetusing89zrlabeledhsa
AT beerambrosj evaluationoftheepreffectinthecammodelbymolecularimagingwithmriandpetusing89zrlabeledhsa
AT raschevolker evaluationoftheepreffectinthecammodelbymolecularimagingwithmriandpetusing89zrlabeledhsa
AT wintergordon evaluationoftheepreffectinthecammodelbymolecularimagingwithmriandpetusing89zrlabeledhsa