Cargando…
Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review
The achievement of aesthetic, functional occlusion should not mark the end of the orthodontic intervention. To prevent relapse, retention needs advance planning, and may vary in duration. This review aims to present and comment on the available means of retention. The ever-popular, passive Hawley-li...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9954726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36832359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10020230 |
_version_ | 1784894187885297664 |
---|---|
author | Lyros, Ioannis Tsolakis, Ioannis A. Maroulakos, Michael P. Fora, Eleni Lykogeorgos, Theodoros Dalampira, Maria Tsolakis, Apostolos I. |
author_facet | Lyros, Ioannis Tsolakis, Ioannis A. Maroulakos, Michael P. Fora, Eleni Lykogeorgos, Theodoros Dalampira, Maria Tsolakis, Apostolos I. |
author_sort | Lyros, Ioannis |
collection | PubMed |
description | The achievement of aesthetic, functional occlusion should not mark the end of the orthodontic intervention. To prevent relapse, retention needs advance planning, and may vary in duration. This review aims to present and comment on the available means of retention. The ever-popular, passive Hawley-like removable appliances are credible in maintaining the desired occlusion. Modifications are the removable appliance Wrap Around, having the labial archwire extending to the premolars; the translucent retainer, Astics, a unique aesthetic Hawley-type device; and the reinforced removable retainer, which features a metallic grid reinforcing the acrylic base. Vacuum-formed retainers are easy to fabricate and are readily prescribed. By contrast, fixed retainers are made of orthodontic wire and composite resin bonded on the lingual or palatal surfaces of the anterior teeth. Patient-related variables need evaluation to select the appropriate retainer, while patients ought to realize the importance of retention and comply with offered guidance. Overall, the orthodontist is responsible for keeping the patient informed on the properties and the duration of retention, even before starting active orthodontic treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9954726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99547262023-02-25 Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review Lyros, Ioannis Tsolakis, Ioannis A. Maroulakos, Michael P. Fora, Eleni Lykogeorgos, Theodoros Dalampira, Maria Tsolakis, Apostolos I. Children (Basel) Review The achievement of aesthetic, functional occlusion should not mark the end of the orthodontic intervention. To prevent relapse, retention needs advance planning, and may vary in duration. This review aims to present and comment on the available means of retention. The ever-popular, passive Hawley-like removable appliances are credible in maintaining the desired occlusion. Modifications are the removable appliance Wrap Around, having the labial archwire extending to the premolars; the translucent retainer, Astics, a unique aesthetic Hawley-type device; and the reinforced removable retainer, which features a metallic grid reinforcing the acrylic base. Vacuum-formed retainers are easy to fabricate and are readily prescribed. By contrast, fixed retainers are made of orthodontic wire and composite resin bonded on the lingual or palatal surfaces of the anterior teeth. Patient-related variables need evaluation to select the appropriate retainer, while patients ought to realize the importance of retention and comply with offered guidance. Overall, the orthodontist is responsible for keeping the patient informed on the properties and the duration of retention, even before starting active orthodontic treatment. MDPI 2023-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9954726/ /pubmed/36832359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10020230 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Lyros, Ioannis Tsolakis, Ioannis A. Maroulakos, Michael P. Fora, Eleni Lykogeorgos, Theodoros Dalampira, Maria Tsolakis, Apostolos I. Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review |
title | Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review |
title_full | Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review |
title_fullStr | Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review |
title_short | Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review |
title_sort | orthodontic retainers—a critical review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9954726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36832359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10020230 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lyrosioannis orthodonticretainersacriticalreview AT tsolakisioannisa orthodonticretainersacriticalreview AT maroulakosmichaelp orthodonticretainersacriticalreview AT foraeleni orthodonticretainersacriticalreview AT lykogeorgostheodoros orthodonticretainersacriticalreview AT dalampiramaria orthodonticretainersacriticalreview AT tsolakisapostolosi orthodonticretainersacriticalreview |