Cargando…

Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review

The achievement of aesthetic, functional occlusion should not mark the end of the orthodontic intervention. To prevent relapse, retention needs advance planning, and may vary in duration. This review aims to present and comment on the available means of retention. The ever-popular, passive Hawley-li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyros, Ioannis, Tsolakis, Ioannis A., Maroulakos, Michael P., Fora, Eleni, Lykogeorgos, Theodoros, Dalampira, Maria, Tsolakis, Apostolos I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9954726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36832359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10020230
_version_ 1784894187885297664
author Lyros, Ioannis
Tsolakis, Ioannis A.
Maroulakos, Michael P.
Fora, Eleni
Lykogeorgos, Theodoros
Dalampira, Maria
Tsolakis, Apostolos I.
author_facet Lyros, Ioannis
Tsolakis, Ioannis A.
Maroulakos, Michael P.
Fora, Eleni
Lykogeorgos, Theodoros
Dalampira, Maria
Tsolakis, Apostolos I.
author_sort Lyros, Ioannis
collection PubMed
description The achievement of aesthetic, functional occlusion should not mark the end of the orthodontic intervention. To prevent relapse, retention needs advance planning, and may vary in duration. This review aims to present and comment on the available means of retention. The ever-popular, passive Hawley-like removable appliances are credible in maintaining the desired occlusion. Modifications are the removable appliance Wrap Around, having the labial archwire extending to the premolars; the translucent retainer, Astics, a unique aesthetic Hawley-type device; and the reinforced removable retainer, which features a metallic grid reinforcing the acrylic base. Vacuum-formed retainers are easy to fabricate and are readily prescribed. By contrast, fixed retainers are made of orthodontic wire and composite resin bonded on the lingual or palatal surfaces of the anterior teeth. Patient-related variables need evaluation to select the appropriate retainer, while patients ought to realize the importance of retention and comply with offered guidance. Overall, the orthodontist is responsible for keeping the patient informed on the properties and the duration of retention, even before starting active orthodontic treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9954726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99547262023-02-25 Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review Lyros, Ioannis Tsolakis, Ioannis A. Maroulakos, Michael P. Fora, Eleni Lykogeorgos, Theodoros Dalampira, Maria Tsolakis, Apostolos I. Children (Basel) Review The achievement of aesthetic, functional occlusion should not mark the end of the orthodontic intervention. To prevent relapse, retention needs advance planning, and may vary in duration. This review aims to present and comment on the available means of retention. The ever-popular, passive Hawley-like removable appliances are credible in maintaining the desired occlusion. Modifications are the removable appliance Wrap Around, having the labial archwire extending to the premolars; the translucent retainer, Astics, a unique aesthetic Hawley-type device; and the reinforced removable retainer, which features a metallic grid reinforcing the acrylic base. Vacuum-formed retainers are easy to fabricate and are readily prescribed. By contrast, fixed retainers are made of orthodontic wire and composite resin bonded on the lingual or palatal surfaces of the anterior teeth. Patient-related variables need evaluation to select the appropriate retainer, while patients ought to realize the importance of retention and comply with offered guidance. Overall, the orthodontist is responsible for keeping the patient informed on the properties and the duration of retention, even before starting active orthodontic treatment. MDPI 2023-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9954726/ /pubmed/36832359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10020230 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Lyros, Ioannis
Tsolakis, Ioannis A.
Maroulakos, Michael P.
Fora, Eleni
Lykogeorgos, Theodoros
Dalampira, Maria
Tsolakis, Apostolos I.
Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review
title Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review
title_full Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review
title_fullStr Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review
title_short Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review
title_sort orthodontic retainers—a critical review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9954726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36832359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10020230
work_keys_str_mv AT lyrosioannis orthodonticretainersacriticalreview
AT tsolakisioannisa orthodonticretainersacriticalreview
AT maroulakosmichaelp orthodonticretainersacriticalreview
AT foraeleni orthodonticretainersacriticalreview
AT lykogeorgostheodoros orthodonticretainersacriticalreview
AT dalampiramaria orthodonticretainersacriticalreview
AT tsolakisapostolosi orthodonticretainersacriticalreview