Cargando…

A Commentary on Electrographic Seizure Management and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Children

Continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring is the gold standard for detecting electrographic seizures in critically ill children and the current consensus-based guidelines recommend urgent cEEG to detect electrographic seizures that would otherwise be undetected. The detection of seizures usually leads to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tran, Lily, Welcher, Rebecca, Scott, Rodney
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9954965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36832387
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10020258
_version_ 1784894240288931840
author Tran, Lily
Welcher, Rebecca
Scott, Rodney
author_facet Tran, Lily
Welcher, Rebecca
Scott, Rodney
author_sort Tran, Lily
collection PubMed
description Continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring is the gold standard for detecting electrographic seizures in critically ill children and the current consensus-based guidelines recommend urgent cEEG to detect electrographic seizures that would otherwise be undetected. The detection of seizures usually leads to the use of antiseizure medications, even though current evidence that treatment leads to important improvements in outcomes is limited, raising the question of whether the current strategies need re-evaluation. There is emerging evidence indicating that the presence of electrographic seizures is not associated with unfavorable neurological outcome, and thus treatment is unlikely to alter the outcomes in these children. However, a high seizure burden and electrographic status epilepticus is associated with unfavorable outcome and the treatment of status epilepticus is currently warranted. Ultimately, outcomes are more likely a function of etiology than of a direct effect of the seizures themselves. We suggest re-examining our current consensus toward aggressive treatment to abolish all electrographic seizures and recommend a tailored approach where therapeutic interventions are indicated when seizure burden breaches above a critical threshold that may be associated with adverse outcomes. Future studies should explicitly evaluate whether there is a positive impact of treating electrographic seizures or electrographic status epilepticus in order to justify continuing current approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9954965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99549652023-02-25 A Commentary on Electrographic Seizure Management and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Children Tran, Lily Welcher, Rebecca Scott, Rodney Children (Basel) Opinion Continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring is the gold standard for detecting electrographic seizures in critically ill children and the current consensus-based guidelines recommend urgent cEEG to detect electrographic seizures that would otherwise be undetected. The detection of seizures usually leads to the use of antiseizure medications, even though current evidence that treatment leads to important improvements in outcomes is limited, raising the question of whether the current strategies need re-evaluation. There is emerging evidence indicating that the presence of electrographic seizures is not associated with unfavorable neurological outcome, and thus treatment is unlikely to alter the outcomes in these children. However, a high seizure burden and electrographic status epilepticus is associated with unfavorable outcome and the treatment of status epilepticus is currently warranted. Ultimately, outcomes are more likely a function of etiology than of a direct effect of the seizures themselves. We suggest re-examining our current consensus toward aggressive treatment to abolish all electrographic seizures and recommend a tailored approach where therapeutic interventions are indicated when seizure burden breaches above a critical threshold that may be associated with adverse outcomes. Future studies should explicitly evaluate whether there is a positive impact of treating electrographic seizures or electrographic status epilepticus in order to justify continuing current approaches. MDPI 2023-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9954965/ /pubmed/36832387 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10020258 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Opinion
Tran, Lily
Welcher, Rebecca
Scott, Rodney
A Commentary on Electrographic Seizure Management and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Children
title A Commentary on Electrographic Seizure Management and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Children
title_full A Commentary on Electrographic Seizure Management and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Children
title_fullStr A Commentary on Electrographic Seizure Management and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Children
title_full_unstemmed A Commentary on Electrographic Seizure Management and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Children
title_short A Commentary on Electrographic Seizure Management and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Children
title_sort commentary on electrographic seizure management and clinical outcomes in critically ill children
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9954965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36832387
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10020258
work_keys_str_mv AT tranlily acommentaryonelectrographicseizuremanagementandclinicaloutcomesincriticallyillchildren
AT welcherrebecca acommentaryonelectrographicseizuremanagementandclinicaloutcomesincriticallyillchildren
AT scottrodney acommentaryonelectrographicseizuremanagementandclinicaloutcomesincriticallyillchildren
AT tranlily commentaryonelectrographicseizuremanagementandclinicaloutcomesincriticallyillchildren
AT welcherrebecca commentaryonelectrographicseizuremanagementandclinicaloutcomesincriticallyillchildren
AT scottrodney commentaryonelectrographicseizuremanagementandclinicaloutcomesincriticallyillchildren