Cargando…

Gram Stain and Culture of Sputum Samples Detect Only Few Pathogens in Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Identification of the bacterial etiology of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) is crucial to ensure a narrow-spectrum, targeted antibiotic treatment. However, Gram stain and culture results are often difficult to interpret as they depend strongly on sputum sample quality. We aimed to investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cartuliares, Mariana B., Skjøt-Arkil, Helene, Mogensen, Christian B., Skovsted, Thor A., Andersen, Steen L., Pedersen, Andreas K., Rosenvinge, Flemming S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36832116
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040628
_version_ 1784894270035984384
author Cartuliares, Mariana B.
Skjøt-Arkil, Helene
Mogensen, Christian B.
Skovsted, Thor A.
Andersen, Steen L.
Pedersen, Andreas K.
Rosenvinge, Flemming S.
author_facet Cartuliares, Mariana B.
Skjøt-Arkil, Helene
Mogensen, Christian B.
Skovsted, Thor A.
Andersen, Steen L.
Pedersen, Andreas K.
Rosenvinge, Flemming S.
author_sort Cartuliares, Mariana B.
collection PubMed
description Identification of the bacterial etiology of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) is crucial to ensure a narrow-spectrum, targeted antibiotic treatment. However, Gram stain and culture results are often difficult to interpret as they depend strongly on sputum sample quality. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic yield of Gram stain and culture from respiratory samples collected by tracheal suction and expiratory technique from adults admitted with suspected community-acquired LRTI (CA-LRTI). In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, 177 (62%) samples were collected by tracheal suction, and 108 (38%) by expiratory technique. We detected few pathogenic microorganisms, and regardless of sputum quality, there were no significant differences between the sample types. Common pathogens of CA-LRTI were identified by culture in 19 (7%) samples, with a significant difference between patients with or without prior antibiotic treatment (p = 0.007). The clinical value of sputum Gram stain and culture in CA-LRTI is therefore questionable, especially in patients treated with antibiotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9955084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99550842023-02-25 Gram Stain and Culture of Sputum Samples Detect Only Few Pathogens in Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial Cartuliares, Mariana B. Skjøt-Arkil, Helene Mogensen, Christian B. Skovsted, Thor A. Andersen, Steen L. Pedersen, Andreas K. Rosenvinge, Flemming S. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Identification of the bacterial etiology of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) is crucial to ensure a narrow-spectrum, targeted antibiotic treatment. However, Gram stain and culture results are often difficult to interpret as they depend strongly on sputum sample quality. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic yield of Gram stain and culture from respiratory samples collected by tracheal suction and expiratory technique from adults admitted with suspected community-acquired LRTI (CA-LRTI). In this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, 177 (62%) samples were collected by tracheal suction, and 108 (38%) by expiratory technique. We detected few pathogenic microorganisms, and regardless of sputum quality, there were no significant differences between the sample types. Common pathogens of CA-LRTI were identified by culture in 19 (7%) samples, with a significant difference between patients with or without prior antibiotic treatment (p = 0.007). The clinical value of sputum Gram stain and culture in CA-LRTI is therefore questionable, especially in patients treated with antibiotics. MDPI 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9955084/ /pubmed/36832116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040628 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cartuliares, Mariana B.
Skjøt-Arkil, Helene
Mogensen, Christian B.
Skovsted, Thor A.
Andersen, Steen L.
Pedersen, Andreas K.
Rosenvinge, Flemming S.
Gram Stain and Culture of Sputum Samples Detect Only Few Pathogens in Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title Gram Stain and Culture of Sputum Samples Detect Only Few Pathogens in Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Gram Stain and Culture of Sputum Samples Detect Only Few Pathogens in Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Gram Stain and Culture of Sputum Samples Detect Only Few Pathogens in Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Gram Stain and Culture of Sputum Samples Detect Only Few Pathogens in Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Gram Stain and Culture of Sputum Samples Detect Only Few Pathogens in Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort gram stain and culture of sputum samples detect only few pathogens in community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36832116
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040628
work_keys_str_mv AT cartuliaresmarianab gramstainandcultureofsputumsamplesdetectonlyfewpathogensincommunityacquiredlowerrespiratorytractinfectionssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT skjøtarkilhelene gramstainandcultureofsputumsamplesdetectonlyfewpathogensincommunityacquiredlowerrespiratorytractinfectionssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mogensenchristianb gramstainandcultureofsputumsamplesdetectonlyfewpathogensincommunityacquiredlowerrespiratorytractinfectionssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT skovstedthora gramstainandcultureofsputumsamplesdetectonlyfewpathogensincommunityacquiredlowerrespiratorytractinfectionssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT andersensteenl gramstainandcultureofsputumsamplesdetectonlyfewpathogensincommunityacquiredlowerrespiratorytractinfectionssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pedersenandreask gramstainandcultureofsputumsamplesdetectonlyfewpathogensincommunityacquiredlowerrespiratorytractinfectionssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rosenvingeflemmings gramstainandcultureofsputumsamplesdetectonlyfewpathogensincommunityacquiredlowerrespiratorytractinfectionssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial