Cargando…
Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study
Aim: To compare health-promoting behaviours among rural and urban residents following primary treatment for cancer. Methods: A cross-sectional survey collecting demographic variables and data pertaining to health-promoting behaviours, documented using the 52-item Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile I...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020122 |
_version_ | 1784894275589242880 |
---|---|
author | Nelson, David McGonagle, Ian Jackson, Christine Tsuro, Trish Scott, Emily Gussy, Mark Kane, Ros |
author_facet | Nelson, David McGonagle, Ian Jackson, Christine Tsuro, Trish Scott, Emily Gussy, Mark Kane, Ros |
author_sort | Nelson, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: To compare health-promoting behaviours among rural and urban residents following primary treatment for cancer. Methods: A cross-sectional survey collecting demographic variables and data pertaining to health-promoting behaviours, documented using the 52-item Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II) measure, which is categorised into six subscales: (1) health responsibility, (2) spiritual growth, (3) physical activity, (4) interpersonal relations, (5) nutrition, and (6) stress management. Residence was defined using the U.K. Office for National Statistics RUC 2011 Rural Urban Classifications. The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) Decile was used to measure deprivation. Quantitative data were analysed using independent samples t-test and multiple linear regression. Qualitative data from open-ended questions were analysed thematically. Results: In total, 227 participants with a range of cancer types completed the questionnaire. Fifty-three percent were residents in urban areas and forty-five percent in rural areas. Rural participants scored significantly higher on health responsibility (p = 0.001), nutrition (p = 0.001), spiritual growth (p = 0.004), and interpersonal relationships (p = 0.001), as well as on the overall HPLP-II (p = 0.001). When controlling for deprivation, age, marital status, and education, rural–urban residence was a significant predictor of exhibiting health-promoting behaviours. A central theme from the qualitative data was the concept of “moving on” from cancer following treatment, by making adjustments to physical, social, psychological, spiritual, and emotional wellbeing. Conclusions: This research revealed, for the first time, differences in health-promoting behaviours among rural and urban U.K. populations who have completed primary cancer treatment. Rural residence can provide a positive environment for engaging with health-promoting behaviours following a cancer diagnosis and treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9955107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99551072023-02-25 Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study Nelson, David McGonagle, Ian Jackson, Christine Tsuro, Trish Scott, Emily Gussy, Mark Kane, Ros Curr Oncol Article Aim: To compare health-promoting behaviours among rural and urban residents following primary treatment for cancer. Methods: A cross-sectional survey collecting demographic variables and data pertaining to health-promoting behaviours, documented using the 52-item Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II) measure, which is categorised into six subscales: (1) health responsibility, (2) spiritual growth, (3) physical activity, (4) interpersonal relations, (5) nutrition, and (6) stress management. Residence was defined using the U.K. Office for National Statistics RUC 2011 Rural Urban Classifications. The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) Decile was used to measure deprivation. Quantitative data were analysed using independent samples t-test and multiple linear regression. Qualitative data from open-ended questions were analysed thematically. Results: In total, 227 participants with a range of cancer types completed the questionnaire. Fifty-three percent were residents in urban areas and forty-five percent in rural areas. Rural participants scored significantly higher on health responsibility (p = 0.001), nutrition (p = 0.001), spiritual growth (p = 0.004), and interpersonal relationships (p = 0.001), as well as on the overall HPLP-II (p = 0.001). When controlling for deprivation, age, marital status, and education, rural–urban residence was a significant predictor of exhibiting health-promoting behaviours. A central theme from the qualitative data was the concept of “moving on” from cancer following treatment, by making adjustments to physical, social, psychological, spiritual, and emotional wellbeing. Conclusions: This research revealed, for the first time, differences in health-promoting behaviours among rural and urban U.K. populations who have completed primary cancer treatment. Rural residence can provide a positive environment for engaging with health-promoting behaviours following a cancer diagnosis and treatment. MDPI 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9955107/ /pubmed/36826083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020122 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nelson, David McGonagle, Ian Jackson, Christine Tsuro, Trish Scott, Emily Gussy, Mark Kane, Ros Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study |
title | Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | health-promoting behaviours following primary treatment for cancer: a rural–urban comparison from a cross-sectional study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nelsondavid healthpromotingbehavioursfollowingprimarytreatmentforcanceraruralurbancomparisonfromacrosssectionalstudy AT mcgonagleian healthpromotingbehavioursfollowingprimarytreatmentforcanceraruralurbancomparisonfromacrosssectionalstudy AT jacksonchristine healthpromotingbehavioursfollowingprimarytreatmentforcanceraruralurbancomparisonfromacrosssectionalstudy AT tsurotrish healthpromotingbehavioursfollowingprimarytreatmentforcanceraruralurbancomparisonfromacrosssectionalstudy AT scottemily healthpromotingbehavioursfollowingprimarytreatmentforcanceraruralurbancomparisonfromacrosssectionalstudy AT gussymark healthpromotingbehavioursfollowingprimarytreatmentforcanceraruralurbancomparisonfromacrosssectionalstudy AT kaneros healthpromotingbehavioursfollowingprimarytreatmentforcanceraruralurbancomparisonfromacrosssectionalstudy |