Cargando…

Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study

Aim: To compare health-promoting behaviours among rural and urban residents following primary treatment for cancer. Methods: A cross-sectional survey collecting demographic variables and data pertaining to health-promoting behaviours, documented using the 52-item Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nelson, David, McGonagle, Ian, Jackson, Christine, Tsuro, Trish, Scott, Emily, Gussy, Mark, Kane, Ros
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020122
_version_ 1784894275589242880
author Nelson, David
McGonagle, Ian
Jackson, Christine
Tsuro, Trish
Scott, Emily
Gussy, Mark
Kane, Ros
author_facet Nelson, David
McGonagle, Ian
Jackson, Christine
Tsuro, Trish
Scott, Emily
Gussy, Mark
Kane, Ros
author_sort Nelson, David
collection PubMed
description Aim: To compare health-promoting behaviours among rural and urban residents following primary treatment for cancer. Methods: A cross-sectional survey collecting demographic variables and data pertaining to health-promoting behaviours, documented using the 52-item Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II) measure, which is categorised into six subscales: (1) health responsibility, (2) spiritual growth, (3) physical activity, (4) interpersonal relations, (5) nutrition, and (6) stress management. Residence was defined using the U.K. Office for National Statistics RUC 2011 Rural Urban Classifications. The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) Decile was used to measure deprivation. Quantitative data were analysed using independent samples t-test and multiple linear regression. Qualitative data from open-ended questions were analysed thematically. Results: In total, 227 participants with a range of cancer types completed the questionnaire. Fifty-three percent were residents in urban areas and forty-five percent in rural areas. Rural participants scored significantly higher on health responsibility (p = 0.001), nutrition (p = 0.001), spiritual growth (p = 0.004), and interpersonal relationships (p = 0.001), as well as on the overall HPLP-II (p = 0.001). When controlling for deprivation, age, marital status, and education, rural–urban residence was a significant predictor of exhibiting health-promoting behaviours. A central theme from the qualitative data was the concept of “moving on” from cancer following treatment, by making adjustments to physical, social, psychological, spiritual, and emotional wellbeing. Conclusions: This research revealed, for the first time, differences in health-promoting behaviours among rural and urban U.K. populations who have completed primary cancer treatment. Rural residence can provide a positive environment for engaging with health-promoting behaviours following a cancer diagnosis and treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9955107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99551072023-02-25 Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study Nelson, David McGonagle, Ian Jackson, Christine Tsuro, Trish Scott, Emily Gussy, Mark Kane, Ros Curr Oncol Article Aim: To compare health-promoting behaviours among rural and urban residents following primary treatment for cancer. Methods: A cross-sectional survey collecting demographic variables and data pertaining to health-promoting behaviours, documented using the 52-item Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II) measure, which is categorised into six subscales: (1) health responsibility, (2) spiritual growth, (3) physical activity, (4) interpersonal relations, (5) nutrition, and (6) stress management. Residence was defined using the U.K. Office for National Statistics RUC 2011 Rural Urban Classifications. The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) Decile was used to measure deprivation. Quantitative data were analysed using independent samples t-test and multiple linear regression. Qualitative data from open-ended questions were analysed thematically. Results: In total, 227 participants with a range of cancer types completed the questionnaire. Fifty-three percent were residents in urban areas and forty-five percent in rural areas. Rural participants scored significantly higher on health responsibility (p = 0.001), nutrition (p = 0.001), spiritual growth (p = 0.004), and interpersonal relationships (p = 0.001), as well as on the overall HPLP-II (p = 0.001). When controlling for deprivation, age, marital status, and education, rural–urban residence was a significant predictor of exhibiting health-promoting behaviours. A central theme from the qualitative data was the concept of “moving on” from cancer following treatment, by making adjustments to physical, social, psychological, spiritual, and emotional wellbeing. Conclusions: This research revealed, for the first time, differences in health-promoting behaviours among rural and urban U.K. populations who have completed primary cancer treatment. Rural residence can provide a positive environment for engaging with health-promoting behaviours following a cancer diagnosis and treatment. MDPI 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9955107/ /pubmed/36826083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020122 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nelson, David
McGonagle, Ian
Jackson, Christine
Tsuro, Trish
Scott, Emily
Gussy, Mark
Kane, Ros
Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study
title Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Health-Promoting Behaviours following Primary Treatment for Cancer: A Rural–Urban Comparison from a Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort health-promoting behaviours following primary treatment for cancer: a rural–urban comparison from a cross-sectional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020122
work_keys_str_mv AT nelsondavid healthpromotingbehavioursfollowingprimarytreatmentforcanceraruralurbancomparisonfromacrosssectionalstudy
AT mcgonagleian healthpromotingbehavioursfollowingprimarytreatmentforcanceraruralurbancomparisonfromacrosssectionalstudy
AT jacksonchristine healthpromotingbehavioursfollowingprimarytreatmentforcanceraruralurbancomparisonfromacrosssectionalstudy
AT tsurotrish healthpromotingbehavioursfollowingprimarytreatmentforcanceraruralurbancomparisonfromacrosssectionalstudy
AT scottemily healthpromotingbehavioursfollowingprimarytreatmentforcanceraruralurbancomparisonfromacrosssectionalstudy
AT gussymark healthpromotingbehavioursfollowingprimarytreatmentforcanceraruralurbancomparisonfromacrosssectionalstudy
AT kaneros healthpromotingbehavioursfollowingprimarytreatmentforcanceraruralurbancomparisonfromacrosssectionalstudy