Cargando…

Experience with the mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus in Pediatric Liver Graft Recipients

Introduction: Immunosuppression after pediatric liver transplantation remains a major challenge. MTOR inhibitors provide a promising therapeutic approach in combination with reduced CNI after transplantation. However, there are still few data regarding their use in children. Patients: We analyzed 37...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wehming, Mathis, Krebs-Schmitt, Dorothée, Briem-Richter, Andrea, Hegen, Bianca, Brinkert, Florian, Fischer, Lutz, Grabhorn, Enke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36832496
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10020367
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: Immunosuppression after pediatric liver transplantation remains a major challenge. MTOR inhibitors provide a promising therapeutic approach in combination with reduced CNI after transplantation. However, there are still few data regarding their use in children. Patients: We analyzed 37 patients with a median age of 10 years, who received Everolimus for one or more of the following indications: I = chronic graft dysfunction (n = 22); II = progressive renal impairment (n = 5); III = non-tolerable side effects with previous immunosuppressive medication (n = 6); and IV = malignancies (n = 10). The median follow-up time was 36 months. Results: Patient survival was 97%, and graft survival 84%, respectively. Stabilization of graft function was observed in 59% in subgroup 1, with 18.2% ultimately requiring retransplantation. No patient in subgroup IV developed recurrence of his primary tumor or PTLD by the endpoint of the study. Side effects were observed in 67.5% of the study patients, with infections being the most frequent (n = 20; 54.1%). There were no relevant effects on growth and development. Conclusion: Everolimus seems to be a treatment option in selected pediatric liver graft recipients for whom other regimens are not suitable. Overall, the efficacy was good and the side effect profile appeared to be acceptable.