Cargando…

Deep Learning-Based Image Quality Improvement in Digital Positron Emission Tomography for Breast Cancer

We investigated whether (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography images restored via deep learning (DL) improved image quality and affected axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis diagnosis in patients with breast cancer. Using a five-point scale, two readers comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mori, Mio, Fujioka, Tomoyuki, Hara, Mayumi, Katsuta, Leona, Yashima, Yuka, Yamaga, Emi, Yamagiwa, Ken, Tsuchiya, Junichi, Hayashi, Kumiko, Kumaki, Yuichi, Oda, Goshi, Nakagawa, Tsuyoshi, Onishi, Iichiroh, Kubota, Kazunori, Tateishi, Ukihide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36832283
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040794
Descripción
Sumario:We investigated whether (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography images restored via deep learning (DL) improved image quality and affected axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis diagnosis in patients with breast cancer. Using a five-point scale, two readers compared the image quality of DL-PET and conventional PET (cPET) in 53 consecutive patients from September 2020 to October 2021. Visually analyzed ipsilateral ALNs were rated on a three-point scale. The standard uptake values SUV(max) and SUV(peak) were calculated for breast cancer regions of interest. For “depiction of primary lesion”, reader 2 scored DL-PET significantly higher than cPET. For “noise”, “clarity of mammary gland”, and “overall image quality”, both readers scored DL-PET significantly higher than cPET. The SUV(max) and SUV(peak) for primary lesions and normal breasts were significantly higher in DL-PET than in cPET (p < 0.001). Considering the ALN metastasis scores 1 and 2 as negative and 3 as positive, the McNemar test revealed no significant difference between cPET and DL-PET scores for either reader (p = 0.250, 0.625). DL-PET improved visual image quality for breast cancer compared with cPET. SUV(max) and SUV(peak) were significantly higher in DL-PET than in cPET. DL-PET and cPET exhibited comparable diagnostic abilities for ALN metastasis.