Cargando…

Low-Dose CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Deep Pelvic Fluid Collections after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Technical Success, Clinical Outcome and Safety in 40 Patients

Purpose: To assess the technical (TS) and clinical success (CS) of CT fluoroscopy-guided drainage (CTD) in patients with symptomatic deep pelvic fluid collections following colorectal surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis (years 2005 to 2020) comprised 43 drain placements in 40 patients undergo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stahl, Robert, Seidensticker, Max, de Figueiredo, Giovanna Negrão, Pedersen, Vera, Crispin, Alexander, Forbrig, Robert, Ozpeynirci, Yigit, Liebig, Thomas, D’Anastasi, Melvin, Hackner, Danilo, Trumm, Christoph G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36832199
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040711
_version_ 1784894429813800960
author Stahl, Robert
Seidensticker, Max
de Figueiredo, Giovanna Negrão
Pedersen, Vera
Crispin, Alexander
Forbrig, Robert
Ozpeynirci, Yigit
Liebig, Thomas
D’Anastasi, Melvin
Hackner, Danilo
Trumm, Christoph G.
author_facet Stahl, Robert
Seidensticker, Max
de Figueiredo, Giovanna Negrão
Pedersen, Vera
Crispin, Alexander
Forbrig, Robert
Ozpeynirci, Yigit
Liebig, Thomas
D’Anastasi, Melvin
Hackner, Danilo
Trumm, Christoph G.
author_sort Stahl, Robert
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To assess the technical (TS) and clinical success (CS) of CT fluoroscopy-guided drainage (CTD) in patients with symptomatic deep pelvic fluid collections following colorectal surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis (years 2005 to 2020) comprised 43 drain placements in 40 patients undergoing low-dose (10–20 mA tube current) quick-check CTD using a percutaneous transgluteal (n = 39) or transperineal (n = 1) access. TS was defined as sufficient drainage of the fluid collection by ≥50% and the absence of complications according to the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). CS comprised the marked reduction of elevated laboratory inflammation parameters by ≥50% under minimally invasive combination therapy (i.v. broad-spectrum antibiotics, drainage) within 30 days after intervention and no surgical revision related to the intervention required. Results: TS was gained in 93.0%. CS was obtained in 83.3% for C-reactive Protein and in 78.6% for Leukocytes. In five patients (12.5%), a reoperation due to an unfavorable clinical outcome was necessary. Total dose length product (DLP) tended to be lower in the second half of the observation period (median: years 2013 to 2020: 544.0 mGy*cm vs. years 2005 to 2012: 735.5 mGy*cm) and was significantly lower for the CT fluoroscopy part (median: years 2013 to 2020: 47.0 mGy*cm vs. years 2005 to 2012: 85.0 mGy*cm). Conclusions: Given a minor proportion of patients requiring surgical revision due to anastomotic leakage, the CTD of deep pelvic fluid collections is safe and provides an excellent technical and clinical outcome. The reduction of radiation exposition over time can be achieved by both the ongoing development of CT technology and the increased level of interventional radiology (IR) expertise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9955776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99557762023-02-25 Low-Dose CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Deep Pelvic Fluid Collections after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Technical Success, Clinical Outcome and Safety in 40 Patients Stahl, Robert Seidensticker, Max de Figueiredo, Giovanna Negrão Pedersen, Vera Crispin, Alexander Forbrig, Robert Ozpeynirci, Yigit Liebig, Thomas D’Anastasi, Melvin Hackner, Danilo Trumm, Christoph G. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Purpose: To assess the technical (TS) and clinical success (CS) of CT fluoroscopy-guided drainage (CTD) in patients with symptomatic deep pelvic fluid collections following colorectal surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis (years 2005 to 2020) comprised 43 drain placements in 40 patients undergoing low-dose (10–20 mA tube current) quick-check CTD using a percutaneous transgluteal (n = 39) or transperineal (n = 1) access. TS was defined as sufficient drainage of the fluid collection by ≥50% and the absence of complications according to the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). CS comprised the marked reduction of elevated laboratory inflammation parameters by ≥50% under minimally invasive combination therapy (i.v. broad-spectrum antibiotics, drainage) within 30 days after intervention and no surgical revision related to the intervention required. Results: TS was gained in 93.0%. CS was obtained in 83.3% for C-reactive Protein and in 78.6% for Leukocytes. In five patients (12.5%), a reoperation due to an unfavorable clinical outcome was necessary. Total dose length product (DLP) tended to be lower in the second half of the observation period (median: years 2013 to 2020: 544.0 mGy*cm vs. years 2005 to 2012: 735.5 mGy*cm) and was significantly lower for the CT fluoroscopy part (median: years 2013 to 2020: 47.0 mGy*cm vs. years 2005 to 2012: 85.0 mGy*cm). Conclusions: Given a minor proportion of patients requiring surgical revision due to anastomotic leakage, the CTD of deep pelvic fluid collections is safe and provides an excellent technical and clinical outcome. The reduction of radiation exposition over time can be achieved by both the ongoing development of CT technology and the increased level of interventional radiology (IR) expertise. MDPI 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9955776/ /pubmed/36832199 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040711 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stahl, Robert
Seidensticker, Max
de Figueiredo, Giovanna Negrão
Pedersen, Vera
Crispin, Alexander
Forbrig, Robert
Ozpeynirci, Yigit
Liebig, Thomas
D’Anastasi, Melvin
Hackner, Danilo
Trumm, Christoph G.
Low-Dose CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Deep Pelvic Fluid Collections after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Technical Success, Clinical Outcome and Safety in 40 Patients
title Low-Dose CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Deep Pelvic Fluid Collections after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Technical Success, Clinical Outcome and Safety in 40 Patients
title_full Low-Dose CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Deep Pelvic Fluid Collections after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Technical Success, Clinical Outcome and Safety in 40 Patients
title_fullStr Low-Dose CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Deep Pelvic Fluid Collections after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Technical Success, Clinical Outcome and Safety in 40 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Low-Dose CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Deep Pelvic Fluid Collections after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Technical Success, Clinical Outcome and Safety in 40 Patients
title_short Low-Dose CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Deep Pelvic Fluid Collections after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Technical Success, Clinical Outcome and Safety in 40 Patients
title_sort low-dose ct fluoroscopy-guided drainage of deep pelvic fluid collections after colorectal cancer surgery: technical success, clinical outcome and safety in 40 patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36832199
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040711
work_keys_str_mv AT stahlrobert lowdosectfluoroscopyguideddrainageofdeeppelvicfluidcollectionsaftercolorectalcancersurgerytechnicalsuccessclinicaloutcomeandsafetyin40patients
AT seidenstickermax lowdosectfluoroscopyguideddrainageofdeeppelvicfluidcollectionsaftercolorectalcancersurgerytechnicalsuccessclinicaloutcomeandsafetyin40patients
AT defigueiredogiovannanegrao lowdosectfluoroscopyguideddrainageofdeeppelvicfluidcollectionsaftercolorectalcancersurgerytechnicalsuccessclinicaloutcomeandsafetyin40patients
AT pedersenvera lowdosectfluoroscopyguideddrainageofdeeppelvicfluidcollectionsaftercolorectalcancersurgerytechnicalsuccessclinicaloutcomeandsafetyin40patients
AT crispinalexander lowdosectfluoroscopyguideddrainageofdeeppelvicfluidcollectionsaftercolorectalcancersurgerytechnicalsuccessclinicaloutcomeandsafetyin40patients
AT forbrigrobert lowdosectfluoroscopyguideddrainageofdeeppelvicfluidcollectionsaftercolorectalcancersurgerytechnicalsuccessclinicaloutcomeandsafetyin40patients
AT ozpeynirciyigit lowdosectfluoroscopyguideddrainageofdeeppelvicfluidcollectionsaftercolorectalcancersurgerytechnicalsuccessclinicaloutcomeandsafetyin40patients
AT liebigthomas lowdosectfluoroscopyguideddrainageofdeeppelvicfluidcollectionsaftercolorectalcancersurgerytechnicalsuccessclinicaloutcomeandsafetyin40patients
AT danastasimelvin lowdosectfluoroscopyguideddrainageofdeeppelvicfluidcollectionsaftercolorectalcancersurgerytechnicalsuccessclinicaloutcomeandsafetyin40patients
AT hacknerdanilo lowdosectfluoroscopyguideddrainageofdeeppelvicfluidcollectionsaftercolorectalcancersurgerytechnicalsuccessclinicaloutcomeandsafetyin40patients
AT trummchristophg lowdosectfluoroscopyguideddrainageofdeeppelvicfluidcollectionsaftercolorectalcancersurgerytechnicalsuccessclinicaloutcomeandsafetyin40patients