Cargando…
Is the Level of Contrast Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) Associated with the Presence and Biological Aggressiveness of Breast Cancer?
There is limited information about whether the level of enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) can be used to predict malignancy. The purpose of this study was to correlate the level of enhancement with the presence of malignancy and breast cancer (BC) aggressiveness on CEM. This IRB-app...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36832242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040754 |
_version_ | 1784894442415587328 |
---|---|
author | Marzogi, Alaa Baltzer, Pascal A. T. Kapetas, Panagiotis Milos, Ruxandra I. Bernathova, Maria Helbich, Thomas H. Clauser, Paola |
author_facet | Marzogi, Alaa Baltzer, Pascal A. T. Kapetas, Panagiotis Milos, Ruxandra I. Bernathova, Maria Helbich, Thomas H. Clauser, Paola |
author_sort | Marzogi, Alaa |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is limited information about whether the level of enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) can be used to predict malignancy. The purpose of this study was to correlate the level of enhancement with the presence of malignancy and breast cancer (BC) aggressiveness on CEM. This IRB-approved, cross-sectional, retrospective study included consecutive patients examined with CEM for unclear or suspicious findings on mammography or ultrasound. Excluded were examinations performed after biopsy or during neoadjuvant treatment for BC. Three breast radiologists who were blinded to patient data evaluated the images. The enhancement intensity was rated from 0 (no enhancement) to 3 (distinct enhancement). ROC analysis was performed. Sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) were calculated after dichotomizing enhancement intensity as negative (0) versus positive (1–3). A total of 156 lesions (93 malignant, 63 benign) in 145 patients (mean age 59 ± 11.6 years) were included. The mean ROC curve was 0.827. Mean sensitivity was 95.4%. Mean LR- was 0.12%. Invasive cancer presented predominantly (61.8%) with distinct enhancement. A lack of enhancement was mainly observed for ductal carcinoma in situ. Stronger enhancement intensity was positively correlated with cancer aggressiveness, but the absence of enhancement should not be used to downgrade suspicious calcifications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9955826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99558262023-02-25 Is the Level of Contrast Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) Associated with the Presence and Biological Aggressiveness of Breast Cancer? Marzogi, Alaa Baltzer, Pascal A. T. Kapetas, Panagiotis Milos, Ruxandra I. Bernathova, Maria Helbich, Thomas H. Clauser, Paola Diagnostics (Basel) Article There is limited information about whether the level of enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) can be used to predict malignancy. The purpose of this study was to correlate the level of enhancement with the presence of malignancy and breast cancer (BC) aggressiveness on CEM. This IRB-approved, cross-sectional, retrospective study included consecutive patients examined with CEM for unclear or suspicious findings on mammography or ultrasound. Excluded were examinations performed after biopsy or during neoadjuvant treatment for BC. Three breast radiologists who were blinded to patient data evaluated the images. The enhancement intensity was rated from 0 (no enhancement) to 3 (distinct enhancement). ROC analysis was performed. Sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) were calculated after dichotomizing enhancement intensity as negative (0) versus positive (1–3). A total of 156 lesions (93 malignant, 63 benign) in 145 patients (mean age 59 ± 11.6 years) were included. The mean ROC curve was 0.827. Mean sensitivity was 95.4%. Mean LR- was 0.12%. Invasive cancer presented predominantly (61.8%) with distinct enhancement. A lack of enhancement was mainly observed for ductal carcinoma in situ. Stronger enhancement intensity was positively correlated with cancer aggressiveness, but the absence of enhancement should not be used to downgrade suspicious calcifications. MDPI 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9955826/ /pubmed/36832242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040754 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Marzogi, Alaa Baltzer, Pascal A. T. Kapetas, Panagiotis Milos, Ruxandra I. Bernathova, Maria Helbich, Thomas H. Clauser, Paola Is the Level of Contrast Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) Associated with the Presence and Biological Aggressiveness of Breast Cancer? |
title | Is the Level of Contrast Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) Associated with the Presence and Biological Aggressiveness of Breast Cancer? |
title_full | Is the Level of Contrast Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) Associated with the Presence and Biological Aggressiveness of Breast Cancer? |
title_fullStr | Is the Level of Contrast Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) Associated with the Presence and Biological Aggressiveness of Breast Cancer? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the Level of Contrast Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) Associated with the Presence and Biological Aggressiveness of Breast Cancer? |
title_short | Is the Level of Contrast Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) Associated with the Presence and Biological Aggressiveness of Breast Cancer? |
title_sort | is the level of contrast enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography (cem) associated with the presence and biological aggressiveness of breast cancer? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36832242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040754 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marzogialaa isthelevelofcontrastenhancementoncontrastenhancedmammographycemassociatedwiththepresenceandbiologicalaggressivenessofbreastcancer AT baltzerpascalat isthelevelofcontrastenhancementoncontrastenhancedmammographycemassociatedwiththepresenceandbiologicalaggressivenessofbreastcancer AT kapetaspanagiotis isthelevelofcontrastenhancementoncontrastenhancedmammographycemassociatedwiththepresenceandbiologicalaggressivenessofbreastcancer AT milosruxandrai isthelevelofcontrastenhancementoncontrastenhancedmammographycemassociatedwiththepresenceandbiologicalaggressivenessofbreastcancer AT bernathovamaria isthelevelofcontrastenhancementoncontrastenhancedmammographycemassociatedwiththepresenceandbiologicalaggressivenessofbreastcancer AT helbichthomash isthelevelofcontrastenhancementoncontrastenhancedmammographycemassociatedwiththepresenceandbiologicalaggressivenessofbreastcancer AT clauserpaola isthelevelofcontrastenhancementoncontrastenhancedmammographycemassociatedwiththepresenceandbiologicalaggressivenessofbreastcancer |