Cargando…
Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of sex on sepsis-related ICU admission and survival for up to 3-years. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adults admitted to Australian ICUs between 2018 and 2020. Men and women with a primary diagnosis of sepsis were included. The primary outcome of time to de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36827250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281939 |
_version_ | 1784894475546394624 |
---|---|
author | Thompson, Kelly Hammond, Naomi Bailey, Michael Darvall, Jai Low, Gary McGloughlin, Steven Modra, Lucy Pilcher, David |
author_facet | Thompson, Kelly Hammond, Naomi Bailey, Michael Darvall, Jai Low, Gary McGloughlin, Steven Modra, Lucy Pilcher, David |
author_sort | Thompson, Kelly |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of sex on sepsis-related ICU admission and survival for up to 3-years. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adults admitted to Australian ICUs between 2018 and 2020. Men and women with a primary diagnosis of sepsis were included. The primary outcome of time to death for up to 3-years was examined using Kaplan Meier plots. Secondary outcomes included the duration of ICU and hospital stay. RESULTS: Of 523,576 admissions, there were 63,039 (12·0%) sepsis-related ICU admissions. Of these, there were 50,956 patients (43·4% women) with 3-year survival data. Men were older (mean age 66·5 vs 63·6 years), more commonly received mechanical ventilation (27·4% vs 24·7%) and renal replacement therapy (8·2% vs 6·8%) and had worse survival (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1·11; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1·07 to 1·14, P<0·001) compared to women. The duration of hospital and ICU stay was longer for men, compared to women (median hospital stay, 9.8 vs 9.4 days; p<0.001 and ICU stay, 2.7 vs 2.6 days; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Men are more likely to be admitted to ICU with sepsis and have worse survival for up to 3-years. Understanding causal mechanisms of sex differences may facilitate the development of targeted sepsis strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9955961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99559612023-02-25 Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study Thompson, Kelly Hammond, Naomi Bailey, Michael Darvall, Jai Low, Gary McGloughlin, Steven Modra, Lucy Pilcher, David PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of sex on sepsis-related ICU admission and survival for up to 3-years. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adults admitted to Australian ICUs between 2018 and 2020. Men and women with a primary diagnosis of sepsis were included. The primary outcome of time to death for up to 3-years was examined using Kaplan Meier plots. Secondary outcomes included the duration of ICU and hospital stay. RESULTS: Of 523,576 admissions, there were 63,039 (12·0%) sepsis-related ICU admissions. Of these, there were 50,956 patients (43·4% women) with 3-year survival data. Men were older (mean age 66·5 vs 63·6 years), more commonly received mechanical ventilation (27·4% vs 24·7%) and renal replacement therapy (8·2% vs 6·8%) and had worse survival (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1·11; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1·07 to 1·14, P<0·001) compared to women. The duration of hospital and ICU stay was longer for men, compared to women (median hospital stay, 9.8 vs 9.4 days; p<0.001 and ICU stay, 2.7 vs 2.6 days; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Men are more likely to be admitted to ICU with sepsis and have worse survival for up to 3-years. Understanding causal mechanisms of sex differences may facilitate the development of targeted sepsis strategies. Public Library of Science 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9955961/ /pubmed/36827250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281939 Text en © 2023 Thompson et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Thompson, Kelly Hammond, Naomi Bailey, Michael Darvall, Jai Low, Gary McGloughlin, Steven Modra, Lucy Pilcher, David Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study |
title | Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study |
title_full | Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study |
title_fullStr | Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study |
title_short | Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study |
title_sort | sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: a cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36827250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281939 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsonkelly sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy AT hammondnaomi sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy AT baileymichael sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy AT darvalljai sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy AT lowgary sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy AT mcgloughlinsteven sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy AT modralucy sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy AT pilcherdavid sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy |