Cargando…

Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of sex on sepsis-related ICU admission and survival for up to 3-years. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adults admitted to Australian ICUs between 2018 and 2020. Men and women with a primary diagnosis of sepsis were included. The primary outcome of time to de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Kelly, Hammond, Naomi, Bailey, Michael, Darvall, Jai, Low, Gary, McGloughlin, Steven, Modra, Lucy, Pilcher, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36827250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281939
_version_ 1784894475546394624
author Thompson, Kelly
Hammond, Naomi
Bailey, Michael
Darvall, Jai
Low, Gary
McGloughlin, Steven
Modra, Lucy
Pilcher, David
author_facet Thompson, Kelly
Hammond, Naomi
Bailey, Michael
Darvall, Jai
Low, Gary
McGloughlin, Steven
Modra, Lucy
Pilcher, David
author_sort Thompson, Kelly
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of sex on sepsis-related ICU admission and survival for up to 3-years. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adults admitted to Australian ICUs between 2018 and 2020. Men and women with a primary diagnosis of sepsis were included. The primary outcome of time to death for up to 3-years was examined using Kaplan Meier plots. Secondary outcomes included the duration of ICU and hospital stay. RESULTS: Of 523,576 admissions, there were 63,039 (12·0%) sepsis-related ICU admissions. Of these, there were 50,956 patients (43·4% women) with 3-year survival data. Men were older (mean age 66·5 vs 63·6 years), more commonly received mechanical ventilation (27·4% vs 24·7%) and renal replacement therapy (8·2% vs 6·8%) and had worse survival (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1·11; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1·07 to 1·14, P<0·001) compared to women. The duration of hospital and ICU stay was longer for men, compared to women (median hospital stay, 9.8 vs 9.4 days; p<0.001 and ICU stay, 2.7 vs 2.6 days; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Men are more likely to be admitted to ICU with sepsis and have worse survival for up to 3-years. Understanding causal mechanisms of sex differences may facilitate the development of targeted sepsis strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9955961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99559612023-02-25 Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study Thompson, Kelly Hammond, Naomi Bailey, Michael Darvall, Jai Low, Gary McGloughlin, Steven Modra, Lucy Pilcher, David PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of sex on sepsis-related ICU admission and survival for up to 3-years. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adults admitted to Australian ICUs between 2018 and 2020. Men and women with a primary diagnosis of sepsis were included. The primary outcome of time to death for up to 3-years was examined using Kaplan Meier plots. Secondary outcomes included the duration of ICU and hospital stay. RESULTS: Of 523,576 admissions, there were 63,039 (12·0%) sepsis-related ICU admissions. Of these, there were 50,956 patients (43·4% women) with 3-year survival data. Men were older (mean age 66·5 vs 63·6 years), more commonly received mechanical ventilation (27·4% vs 24·7%) and renal replacement therapy (8·2% vs 6·8%) and had worse survival (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1·11; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1·07 to 1·14, P<0·001) compared to women. The duration of hospital and ICU stay was longer for men, compared to women (median hospital stay, 9.8 vs 9.4 days; p<0.001 and ICU stay, 2.7 vs 2.6 days; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Men are more likely to be admitted to ICU with sepsis and have worse survival for up to 3-years. Understanding causal mechanisms of sex differences may facilitate the development of targeted sepsis strategies. Public Library of Science 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9955961/ /pubmed/36827250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281939 Text en © 2023 Thompson et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thompson, Kelly
Hammond, Naomi
Bailey, Michael
Darvall, Jai
Low, Gary
McGloughlin, Steven
Modra, Lucy
Pilcher, David
Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study
title Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study
title_full Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study
title_fullStr Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study
title_short Sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: A cohort study
title_sort sex differences in long-term survival after intensive care unit treatment for sepsis: a cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9955961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36827250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281939
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonkelly sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy
AT hammondnaomi sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy
AT baileymichael sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy
AT darvalljai sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy
AT lowgary sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy
AT mcgloughlinsteven sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy
AT modralucy sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy
AT pilcherdavid sexdifferencesinlongtermsurvivalafterintensivecareunittreatmentforsepsisacohortstudy