Cargando…
The prognostic utility of prehospital qSOFA in addition to emergency department qSOFA for sepsis in patients with suspected infection: A retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) was widely used to estimate the risks of sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the prehospital and emergency department (ED) settings. Due to the insufficient sensitivity of qSOFA on arrival at the ED (ED qSOFA), the Survivin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9956063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36827234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282148 |
_version_ | 1784894500751015936 |
---|---|
author | Saito, Ayaka Osawa, Itsuki Shibata, Junichiro Sonoo, Tomohiro Nakamura, Kensuke Goto, Tadahiro |
author_facet | Saito, Ayaka Osawa, Itsuki Shibata, Junichiro Sonoo, Tomohiro Nakamura, Kensuke Goto, Tadahiro |
author_sort | Saito, Ayaka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) was widely used to estimate the risks of sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the prehospital and emergency department (ED) settings. Due to the insufficient sensitivity of qSOFA on arrival at the ED (ED qSOFA), the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2021 recommended against using qSOFA as a single screening tool for sepsis. However, it remains unclear whether the combined use of prehospital and ED qSOFA improves its sensitivity for identifying patients at a higher risk of sepsis at the ED. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data from the ED of a tertiary medical center in Japan from April 2018 through March 2021. Among all adult patients (aged ≥18 years) transported by ambulance to the ED with suspected infection, we identified patients who were subsequently diagnosed with sepsis based on the Sepsis-3 criteria. We compared the predictive abilities of prehospital qSOFA, ED qSOFA, and the sum of prehospital and ED qSOFA (combined qSOFA) for sepsis in patients with suspected infection at the ED. RESULTS: Among 2,407 patients with suspected infection transported to the ED by ambulance, 369 (15%) patients were subsequently diagnosed with sepsis, and 217 (9%) died during hospitalization. The sensitivity of prehospital qSOFA ≥2 and ED qSOFA ≥2 were comparable (c-statistics for sepsis [95%CI], 0.57 [0.52–0.62] vs. 0.55 [0.50–0.60]). However, combined qSOFA (cutoff, ≥3 [max 6]) was more sensitive than ED qSOFA (cutoff, ≥2) for identifying sepsis (0.67 [95%CI, 0.62–0.72] vs. 0.55 [95%CI, 0.50–0.60]). Using combined qSOFA, we identified 44 (12%) out of 369 patients who were subsequently diagnosed with sepsis, which would have been missed using ED qSOFA alone. CONCLUSIONS: Using both prehospital and ED qSOFA could improve the screening ability of sepsis among patients with suspected infection at the ED. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9956063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99560632023-02-25 The prognostic utility of prehospital qSOFA in addition to emergency department qSOFA for sepsis in patients with suspected infection: A retrospective cohort study Saito, Ayaka Osawa, Itsuki Shibata, Junichiro Sonoo, Tomohiro Nakamura, Kensuke Goto, Tadahiro PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) was widely used to estimate the risks of sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the prehospital and emergency department (ED) settings. Due to the insufficient sensitivity of qSOFA on arrival at the ED (ED qSOFA), the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2021 recommended against using qSOFA as a single screening tool for sepsis. However, it remains unclear whether the combined use of prehospital and ED qSOFA improves its sensitivity for identifying patients at a higher risk of sepsis at the ED. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data from the ED of a tertiary medical center in Japan from April 2018 through March 2021. Among all adult patients (aged ≥18 years) transported by ambulance to the ED with suspected infection, we identified patients who were subsequently diagnosed with sepsis based on the Sepsis-3 criteria. We compared the predictive abilities of prehospital qSOFA, ED qSOFA, and the sum of prehospital and ED qSOFA (combined qSOFA) for sepsis in patients with suspected infection at the ED. RESULTS: Among 2,407 patients with suspected infection transported to the ED by ambulance, 369 (15%) patients were subsequently diagnosed with sepsis, and 217 (9%) died during hospitalization. The sensitivity of prehospital qSOFA ≥2 and ED qSOFA ≥2 were comparable (c-statistics for sepsis [95%CI], 0.57 [0.52–0.62] vs. 0.55 [0.50–0.60]). However, combined qSOFA (cutoff, ≥3 [max 6]) was more sensitive than ED qSOFA (cutoff, ≥2) for identifying sepsis (0.67 [95%CI, 0.62–0.72] vs. 0.55 [95%CI, 0.50–0.60]). Using combined qSOFA, we identified 44 (12%) out of 369 patients who were subsequently diagnosed with sepsis, which would have been missed using ED qSOFA alone. CONCLUSIONS: Using both prehospital and ED qSOFA could improve the screening ability of sepsis among patients with suspected infection at the ED. Public Library of Science 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9956063/ /pubmed/36827234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282148 Text en © 2023 Saito et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Saito, Ayaka Osawa, Itsuki Shibata, Junichiro Sonoo, Tomohiro Nakamura, Kensuke Goto, Tadahiro The prognostic utility of prehospital qSOFA in addition to emergency department qSOFA for sepsis in patients with suspected infection: A retrospective cohort study |
title | The prognostic utility of prehospital qSOFA in addition to emergency department qSOFA for sepsis in patients with suspected infection: A retrospective cohort study |
title_full | The prognostic utility of prehospital qSOFA in addition to emergency department qSOFA for sepsis in patients with suspected infection: A retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | The prognostic utility of prehospital qSOFA in addition to emergency department qSOFA for sepsis in patients with suspected infection: A retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The prognostic utility of prehospital qSOFA in addition to emergency department qSOFA for sepsis in patients with suspected infection: A retrospective cohort study |
title_short | The prognostic utility of prehospital qSOFA in addition to emergency department qSOFA for sepsis in patients with suspected infection: A retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | prognostic utility of prehospital qsofa in addition to emergency department qsofa for sepsis in patients with suspected infection: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9956063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36827234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282148 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saitoayaka theprognosticutilityofprehospitalqsofainadditiontoemergencydepartmentqsofaforsepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT osawaitsuki theprognosticutilityofprehospitalqsofainadditiontoemergencydepartmentqsofaforsepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT shibatajunichiro theprognosticutilityofprehospitalqsofainadditiontoemergencydepartmentqsofaforsepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT sonootomohiro theprognosticutilityofprehospitalqsofainadditiontoemergencydepartmentqsofaforsepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT nakamurakensuke theprognosticutilityofprehospitalqsofainadditiontoemergencydepartmentqsofaforsepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT gototadahiro theprognosticutilityofprehospitalqsofainadditiontoemergencydepartmentqsofaforsepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT saitoayaka prognosticutilityofprehospitalqsofainadditiontoemergencydepartmentqsofaforsepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT osawaitsuki prognosticutilityofprehospitalqsofainadditiontoemergencydepartmentqsofaforsepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT shibatajunichiro prognosticutilityofprehospitalqsofainadditiontoemergencydepartmentqsofaforsepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT sonootomohiro prognosticutilityofprehospitalqsofainadditiontoemergencydepartmentqsofaforsepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT nakamurakensuke prognosticutilityofprehospitalqsofainadditiontoemergencydepartmentqsofaforsepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT gototadahiro prognosticutilityofprehospitalqsofainadditiontoemergencydepartmentqsofaforsepsisinpatientswithsuspectedinfectionaretrospectivecohortstudy |