Cargando…

Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section and Unfavorable Cervix: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: The efficacy and safety of a cervical ripening balloon (CRB) in women with a previous cesarean section (CS) and unfavorable Bishop score are still controversial. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed across six tertiary hospitals from 2015 to 2019. Women with one previous t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Germano, Chiara, Mappa, Ilenia, Cromi, Antonella, Busato, Enrico, Incerti, Maddalena, Lojacono, Andrea, Rizzo, Giuseppe, Attini, Rossella, Patrizi, Lodovico, Revelli, Alberto, Masturzo, Bianca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9956585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36833077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040543
_version_ 1784894619905949696
author Germano, Chiara
Mappa, Ilenia
Cromi, Antonella
Busato, Enrico
Incerti, Maddalena
Lojacono, Andrea
Rizzo, Giuseppe
Attini, Rossella
Patrizi, Lodovico
Revelli, Alberto
Masturzo, Bianca
author_facet Germano, Chiara
Mappa, Ilenia
Cromi, Antonella
Busato, Enrico
Incerti, Maddalena
Lojacono, Andrea
Rizzo, Giuseppe
Attini, Rossella
Patrizi, Lodovico
Revelli, Alberto
Masturzo, Bianca
author_sort Germano, Chiara
collection PubMed
description Background: The efficacy and safety of a cervical ripening balloon (CRB) in women with a previous cesarean section (CS) and unfavorable Bishop score are still controversial. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed across six tertiary hospitals from 2015 to 2019. Women with one previous transverse CS, singleton cephalic term pregnancy and BS < 6 were included if submitted to labor induction with a CRB. The main outcome was the rate of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) after CRB ripening. Secondary outcomes were abnormal composite fetal and maternal outcomes. Results: Of the 265 women included, 57.3% had successful vaginal birth. Augmentation improved vaginal delivery (32.2% vs. 21.2%). Intrapartum analgesia was associated with an increased VBAC rate (58.6% vs. 34.5%). Maternal BMI ≥30 and age ≥40 years increased emergency CS rate (11.8% vs. 28.3% and 7.2 vs. 15.9%). Composite adverse maternal outcome occurred in 4.8% of CRB group women and increased to 17.6% when associated with oxytocin. Uterine rupture occurred in one case (0.4%) in the CRB–oxytocin group. Poorer fetal outcome occurred after emergency CS, if compared to successful VBAC (12.4% vs. 3.3%). Conclusions: In women with a previous CS and unfavorable Bishop score, induction of labor with a CRB can be considered safe and effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9956585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99565852023-02-25 Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section and Unfavorable Cervix: A Retrospective Cohort Study Germano, Chiara Mappa, Ilenia Cromi, Antonella Busato, Enrico Incerti, Maddalena Lojacono, Andrea Rizzo, Giuseppe Attini, Rossella Patrizi, Lodovico Revelli, Alberto Masturzo, Bianca Healthcare (Basel) Article Background: The efficacy and safety of a cervical ripening balloon (CRB) in women with a previous cesarean section (CS) and unfavorable Bishop score are still controversial. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed across six tertiary hospitals from 2015 to 2019. Women with one previous transverse CS, singleton cephalic term pregnancy and BS < 6 were included if submitted to labor induction with a CRB. The main outcome was the rate of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) after CRB ripening. Secondary outcomes were abnormal composite fetal and maternal outcomes. Results: Of the 265 women included, 57.3% had successful vaginal birth. Augmentation improved vaginal delivery (32.2% vs. 21.2%). Intrapartum analgesia was associated with an increased VBAC rate (58.6% vs. 34.5%). Maternal BMI ≥30 and age ≥40 years increased emergency CS rate (11.8% vs. 28.3% and 7.2 vs. 15.9%). Composite adverse maternal outcome occurred in 4.8% of CRB group women and increased to 17.6% when associated with oxytocin. Uterine rupture occurred in one case (0.4%) in the CRB–oxytocin group. Poorer fetal outcome occurred after emergency CS, if compared to successful VBAC (12.4% vs. 3.3%). Conclusions: In women with a previous CS and unfavorable Bishop score, induction of labor with a CRB can be considered safe and effective. MDPI 2023-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9956585/ /pubmed/36833077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040543 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Germano, Chiara
Mappa, Ilenia
Cromi, Antonella
Busato, Enrico
Incerti, Maddalena
Lojacono, Andrea
Rizzo, Giuseppe
Attini, Rossella
Patrizi, Lodovico
Revelli, Alberto
Masturzo, Bianca
Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section and Unfavorable Cervix: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section and Unfavorable Cervix: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section and Unfavorable Cervix: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section and Unfavorable Cervix: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section and Unfavorable Cervix: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section and Unfavorable Cervix: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix: a retrospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9956585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36833077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040543
work_keys_str_mv AT germanochiara inductionoflaborinwomenwithpreviouscesareansectionandunfavorablecervixaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mappailenia inductionoflaborinwomenwithpreviouscesareansectionandunfavorablecervixaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT cromiantonella inductionoflaborinwomenwithpreviouscesareansectionandunfavorablecervixaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT busatoenrico inductionoflaborinwomenwithpreviouscesareansectionandunfavorablecervixaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT incertimaddalena inductionoflaborinwomenwithpreviouscesareansectionandunfavorablecervixaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lojaconoandrea inductionoflaborinwomenwithpreviouscesareansectionandunfavorablecervixaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT rizzogiuseppe inductionoflaborinwomenwithpreviouscesareansectionandunfavorablecervixaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT attinirossella inductionoflaborinwomenwithpreviouscesareansectionandunfavorablecervixaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT patrizilodovico inductionoflaborinwomenwithpreviouscesareansectionandunfavorablecervixaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT revellialberto inductionoflaborinwomenwithpreviouscesareansectionandunfavorablecervixaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT masturzobianca inductionoflaborinwomenwithpreviouscesareansectionandunfavorablecervixaretrospectivecohortstudy