Cargando…

Comparison of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic effects of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in preterm birth due to cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy. METHODS: A combination of subject words and free words was used to search major domestic and foreign databases. According to inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Yanfang, Wang, Sumei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9956608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36827361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278342
_version_ 1784894625674166272
author Wei, Yanfang
Wang, Sumei
author_facet Wei, Yanfang
Wang, Sumei
author_sort Wei, Yanfang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic effects of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in preterm birth due to cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy. METHODS: A combination of subject words and free words was used to search major domestic and foreign databases. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 23 studies were included that met the criteria and quality evaluation and data extraction was carried out. The data were analyzed using STATA 15 and the reporting was done in reference to the list of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses. RESULTS: Emergency cervical cerclage was superior to expectant treatment for the primary outcome of pregnancy prolongation (WMD = 5.752, 95% CI 5.194–6.311, 22 studies, N = 1435, I(2) = 97.1%, P = 0.000). Cervical cerclage was also superior to expectant treatment for the secondary outcomes of neonatal birth weight (WMD = 1051.542, 95% CI 594.107–1508.977, 9 studies, N = 609, I(2) = 96.4%, P = 0.000), neonatal Apgar 1′ (WMD = 2.8720, 95% CI: 2.105–3.639, 11 studies, N = 716, I(2) = 99.0%, P = 0.000), number of live births (OR = 6.018, 95% CI 2.882–12.568, 10 studies, N = 724, I(2) = 55.3%, P = 0.000), deliveries after 32 weeks (OR = 8.030, 95% CI 1.38–46.892, 8 studies, N = 381, I(2) = 85.9%, P = 0.021). deliveries after 34 weeks (OR = 15.91, 95% CI 5.92–42.77, 9 studies, N = 560, I(2) = 59.6%, P = 0.000), number of vaginal deliveries (OR = 3.24, 95% CI 1.32–7.90, 8 studies, N = 502, I(2) = 69.4%, P = 0.018), and number of neonatal survivals (OR = 9.300, 95% CI 3.472–24.910, 10 studies, N = 654, I(2) = 80.5%, P = 0.000). No difference between emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment was found in patients with chorioamnionitis (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 0.602–4.583, 4 studies, N = 296, I(2) = 16.3%, P = 0.273). CONCLUSION: Before the 28th week of pregnancy, emergency cervical cerclage can significantly prolong the gestational week and improve the neonatal survival rate, compared to expectant treatment, in women with singleton pregnancies who have a dilated uterine orifice caused by cervical insufficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9956608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99566082023-02-25 Comparison of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy: A meta-analysis Wei, Yanfang Wang, Sumei PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic effects of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in preterm birth due to cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy. METHODS: A combination of subject words and free words was used to search major domestic and foreign databases. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 23 studies were included that met the criteria and quality evaluation and data extraction was carried out. The data were analyzed using STATA 15 and the reporting was done in reference to the list of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses. RESULTS: Emergency cervical cerclage was superior to expectant treatment for the primary outcome of pregnancy prolongation (WMD = 5.752, 95% CI 5.194–6.311, 22 studies, N = 1435, I(2) = 97.1%, P = 0.000). Cervical cerclage was also superior to expectant treatment for the secondary outcomes of neonatal birth weight (WMD = 1051.542, 95% CI 594.107–1508.977, 9 studies, N = 609, I(2) = 96.4%, P = 0.000), neonatal Apgar 1′ (WMD = 2.8720, 95% CI: 2.105–3.639, 11 studies, N = 716, I(2) = 99.0%, P = 0.000), number of live births (OR = 6.018, 95% CI 2.882–12.568, 10 studies, N = 724, I(2) = 55.3%, P = 0.000), deliveries after 32 weeks (OR = 8.030, 95% CI 1.38–46.892, 8 studies, N = 381, I(2) = 85.9%, P = 0.021). deliveries after 34 weeks (OR = 15.91, 95% CI 5.92–42.77, 9 studies, N = 560, I(2) = 59.6%, P = 0.000), number of vaginal deliveries (OR = 3.24, 95% CI 1.32–7.90, 8 studies, N = 502, I(2) = 69.4%, P = 0.018), and number of neonatal survivals (OR = 9.300, 95% CI 3.472–24.910, 10 studies, N = 654, I(2) = 80.5%, P = 0.000). No difference between emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment was found in patients with chorioamnionitis (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 0.602–4.583, 4 studies, N = 296, I(2) = 16.3%, P = 0.273). CONCLUSION: Before the 28th week of pregnancy, emergency cervical cerclage can significantly prolong the gestational week and improve the neonatal survival rate, compared to expectant treatment, in women with singleton pregnancies who have a dilated uterine orifice caused by cervical insufficiency. Public Library of Science 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9956608/ /pubmed/36827361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278342 Text en © 2023 Wei, Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wei, Yanfang
Wang, Sumei
Comparison of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy: A meta-analysis
title Comparison of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy: A meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy: A meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy: A meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of emergency cervical cerclage and expectant treatment in cervical insufficiency in singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9956608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36827361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278342
work_keys_str_mv AT weiyanfang comparisonofemergencycervicalcerclageandexpectanttreatmentincervicalinsufficiencyinsingletonpregnancyametaanalysis
AT wangsumei comparisonofemergencycervicalcerclageandexpectanttreatmentincervicalinsufficiencyinsingletonpregnancyametaanalysis