Cargando…

PEEP-ZEEP Compared with Bag Squeezing and Chest Compression in Mechanically Ventilated Cardiac Patients: Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial

Background and Objectives: Perform the bag squeezing and PEEP-ZEEP techniques associated with manual chest compression in mechanically ventilated cardiac patients in order to observe their effectiveness in the removal of pulmonary secretions and safety from a hemodynamic and ventilatory point of vie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Oliveira, Taís Flores, Peringer, Vinicius Serra, Forgiarini Junior, Luiz Alberto, Eibel, Bruna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36833521
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042824
_version_ 1784894790498779136
author de Oliveira, Taís Flores
Peringer, Vinicius Serra
Forgiarini Junior, Luiz Alberto
Eibel, Bruna
author_facet de Oliveira, Taís Flores
Peringer, Vinicius Serra
Forgiarini Junior, Luiz Alberto
Eibel, Bruna
author_sort de Oliveira, Taís Flores
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Perform the bag squeezing and PEEP-ZEEP techniques associated with manual chest compression in mechanically ventilated cardiac patients in order to observe their effectiveness in the removal of pulmonary secretions and safety from a hemodynamic and ventilatory point of view. Methods: This is a randomized crossover clinical trial developed in a hospital in southern Brazil. We included hemodynamically stable male and female patients aged over 18 years who used invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h. The control group was established for the bag-squeezing technique and the intervention group for the PEEP-ZEEP maneuver, both associated with manual chest compression. Tracheal aspiration was performed 2 h before in order to match the groups in relation to the volume of secretion, and also immediately at the end of the techniques in order to measure the amount of secretion collected. Results: The sample had 36 individuals with a mean age of 70.3 years, 21% of the patients were male, and the majority (10.4%) were hospitalized for ischemic heart disease. DBP (p = 0.024), MAP (p = 0.004) and RR (p = 0.041) showed a significant difference in the post-moment in both groups. There was a significant difference in the reduction of peak pressure values (p = 0.011), in the moment after performing the techniques, and also in the Cdyn (p = 0.004) in the control group versus moment. Conclusions: Both maneuvers are safe in terms of hemodynamics and ventilatory mechanics, in addition to being capable of favoring airway clearance through secretion removal, and they can be used in routine physiotherapeutic care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9957294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99572942023-02-25 PEEP-ZEEP Compared with Bag Squeezing and Chest Compression in Mechanically Ventilated Cardiac Patients: Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial de Oliveira, Taís Flores Peringer, Vinicius Serra Forgiarini Junior, Luiz Alberto Eibel, Bruna Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background and Objectives: Perform the bag squeezing and PEEP-ZEEP techniques associated with manual chest compression in mechanically ventilated cardiac patients in order to observe their effectiveness in the removal of pulmonary secretions and safety from a hemodynamic and ventilatory point of view. Methods: This is a randomized crossover clinical trial developed in a hospital in southern Brazil. We included hemodynamically stable male and female patients aged over 18 years who used invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h. The control group was established for the bag-squeezing technique and the intervention group for the PEEP-ZEEP maneuver, both associated with manual chest compression. Tracheal aspiration was performed 2 h before in order to match the groups in relation to the volume of secretion, and also immediately at the end of the techniques in order to measure the amount of secretion collected. Results: The sample had 36 individuals with a mean age of 70.3 years, 21% of the patients were male, and the majority (10.4%) were hospitalized for ischemic heart disease. DBP (p = 0.024), MAP (p = 0.004) and RR (p = 0.041) showed a significant difference in the post-moment in both groups. There was a significant difference in the reduction of peak pressure values (p = 0.011), in the moment after performing the techniques, and also in the Cdyn (p = 0.004) in the control group versus moment. Conclusions: Both maneuvers are safe in terms of hemodynamics and ventilatory mechanics, in addition to being capable of favoring airway clearance through secretion removal, and they can be used in routine physiotherapeutic care. MDPI 2023-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9957294/ /pubmed/36833521 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042824 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
de Oliveira, Taís Flores
Peringer, Vinicius Serra
Forgiarini Junior, Luiz Alberto
Eibel, Bruna
PEEP-ZEEP Compared with Bag Squeezing and Chest Compression in Mechanically Ventilated Cardiac Patients: Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial
title PEEP-ZEEP Compared with Bag Squeezing and Chest Compression in Mechanically Ventilated Cardiac Patients: Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial
title_full PEEP-ZEEP Compared with Bag Squeezing and Chest Compression in Mechanically Ventilated Cardiac Patients: Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial
title_fullStr PEEP-ZEEP Compared with Bag Squeezing and Chest Compression in Mechanically Ventilated Cardiac Patients: Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed PEEP-ZEEP Compared with Bag Squeezing and Chest Compression in Mechanically Ventilated Cardiac Patients: Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial
title_short PEEP-ZEEP Compared with Bag Squeezing and Chest Compression in Mechanically Ventilated Cardiac Patients: Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial
title_sort peep-zeep compared with bag squeezing and chest compression in mechanically ventilated cardiac patients: randomized crossover clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36833521
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042824
work_keys_str_mv AT deoliveirataisflores peepzeepcomparedwithbagsqueezingandchestcompressioninmechanicallyventilatedcardiacpatientsrandomizedcrossoverclinicaltrial
AT peringerviniciusserra peepzeepcomparedwithbagsqueezingandchestcompressioninmechanicallyventilatedcardiacpatientsrandomizedcrossoverclinicaltrial
AT forgiarinijuniorluizalberto peepzeepcomparedwithbagsqueezingandchestcompressioninmechanicallyventilatedcardiacpatientsrandomizedcrossoverclinicaltrial
AT eibelbruna peepzeepcomparedwithbagsqueezingandchestcompressioninmechanicallyventilatedcardiacpatientsrandomizedcrossoverclinicaltrial